These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35881629)

  • 1. Morally excused but socially excluded: Denying agency through the defense of mental impairment.
    de Vel-Palumbo M; Ferguson R; Schein C; Chang MX; Bastian B
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(7):e0272061. PubMed ID: 35881629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Morally excused but socially excluded: Denying agency through the defense of mental impairment.
    de Vel-Palumbo M; Schein C; Ferguson R; Chang MX; Bastian B
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(6):e0252586. PubMed ID: 34111148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy of legal judgments for defendants with traumatic brain injury.
    St Pierre ME; Parente R
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2016 Jun; 39(1):125-34. PubMed ID: 27341367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Wrong or merely prohibited: Special treatment of strict liability in intuitive moral judgment.
    Giffin C; Lombrozo T
    Law Hum Behav; 2016 Dec; 40(6):707-720. PubMed ID: 27631401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The psychology of defendant plea decision making.
    Redlich AD; Bibas S; Edkins VA; Madon S
    Am Psychol; 2017; 72(4):339-352. PubMed ID: 28481581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Content and comprehensibility of juvenile and adult tender-of-plea forms: implications for knowing, intelligent, and voluntary guilty pleas.
    Redlich AD; Bonventre CL
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Apr; 39(2):162-76. PubMed ID: 25528381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sex, sexual orientation, and sexism: what influence do these factors have on verdicts in a crime-of-passion case?
    Ragatz LL; Russell B
    J Soc Psychol; 2010; 150(4):341-60. PubMed ID: 20718220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The insanity defense: effects of abolition unsupported by a moral consensus.
    Cobun LS
    Am J Law Med; 1984; 9(4):471-500. PubMed ID: 6486122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. From whose perspective? Differences between actors and observers in determining the voluntariness of guilty pleas.
    Fessinger MB; Kovera MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2022 Oct; 46(5):353-371. PubMed ID: 36227320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. People systematically update moral judgments of blame.
    Monroe AE; Malle BF
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2019 Feb; 116(2):215-236. PubMed ID: 30359071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Defendant stereotypicality moderates the effect of confession evidence on judgments of guilt.
    Smalarz L; Madon S; Turosak A
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Aug; 42(4):355-368. PubMed ID: 29939062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. "False positive" emotions, responsibility, and moral character.
    Anderson RA; Kamtekar R; Nichols S; Pizarro DA
    Cognition; 2021 Sep; 214():104770. PubMed ID: 34023670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ripple effects in memory: judgments of moral blame can distort memory for events.
    Pizarro DA; Laney C; Morris EK; Loftus EF
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Apr; 34(3):550-5. PubMed ID: 16933764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. No luck for moral luck.
    Kneer M; Machery E
    Cognition; 2019 Jan; 182():331-348. PubMed ID: 30428399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Blaming, praising, and protecting our humanity: the implications of everyday dehumanization for judgments of moral status.
    Bastian B; Laham SM; Wilson S; Haslam N; Koval P
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2011 Sep; 50(3):469-83. PubMed ID: 21884545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acknowledging and managing deep constraints on moral agency and the self.
    Niemi L; Graham J
    Behav Brain Sci; 2018 Jan; 41():e55. PubMed ID: 31064462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of accounts and remorse on mock jurors' judgments of offenders.
    Jehle A; Miller MK; Kemmelmeier M
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Oct; 33(5):393-404. PubMed ID: 19082696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. COVID-19 exacerbates existing system factors that disadvantage defendants: Findings from a national survey of defense attorneys.
    Daftary-Kapur T; Henderson KS; Zottoli TM
    Law Hum Behav; 2021 Apr; 45(2):81-96. PubMed ID: 34110871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Direct and indirect freedom in addiction: Folk free will and blame judgments are sensitive to the choice history of drug users.
    Taylor M; Maranges HM; Chen SK; Vonasch AJ
    Conscious Cogn; 2021 Sep; 94():103170. PubMed ID: 34320424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Moral typecasting: divergent perceptions of moral agents and moral patients.
    Gray K; Wegner DM
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Mar; 96(3):505-20. PubMed ID: 19254100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.