These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3588184)
41. Two faces of sign: iconic and abstract. Bellugi U; Klima ES Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1976; 280():514-38. PubMed ID: 1070935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Three dimensional view of sign iconicity. Griffith PL; Panagos JM; Robinson JH Percept Mot Skills; 1981 Apr; 52(2):665-6. PubMed ID: 7255076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Sign-based short-term coding of American sign language signs and printed english words by congenitally deaf signers. Shand MA Cogn Psychol; 1982 Jan; 14(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 7053924 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Intelligibility and comprehension of time compressed sign language narratives. Heiman GW; Tweney RD J Psycholinguist Res; 1981 Jan; 10(1):3-15. PubMed ID: 7241407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Deaf children creating written texts: contributions of American Sign Language and signed forms of English. Mayer C; Akamatsu CT Am Ann Deaf; 2000 Dec; 145(5):394-403. PubMed ID: 11191818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. The American Sign Language/English Studies Project: a progress report. Brodesky RL; Cohen H Am Ann Deaf; 1988 Dec; 133(5):330-5. PubMed ID: 3251419 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Visual and production similarity of the handshapes of the American manual alphabet. Richards JT; Hanson VL Percept Psychophys; 1985 Oct; 38(4):311-9. PubMed ID: 3831908 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Perception of American sign language in dynamic point-light displays. Poizner H; Bellugi U; Lutes-Driscoll V J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1981 Apr; 7(2):430-40. PubMed ID: 6453935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Rationale and strategies for American Sign Language intervention. Stewart DA Am Ann Deaf; 1990 Jul; 135(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 2285028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Towards a theory of use for signed English: from birth through adulthood. Bornstein H Am Ann Deaf; 1982 Feb; 127(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 7072564 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Developing written literacy in deaf children through analyzing sign language. Akamatsu CT; Armour VA Am Ann Deaf; 1987 Mar; 132(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 3630871 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Language: perspectives from another modality. Bellugi U; Klima ES Ciba Found Symp; 1979; (69):99-117. PubMed ID: 261658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. American sign language in education of the deaf. Clements AH; Prickett HT Am Ann Deaf; 1986 Jul; 131(3):218-9. PubMed ID: 3751821 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. The development of language-like communication without a language model. Goldin-Meadow S; Feldman H Science; 1977 Jul; 197(4301):401-3. PubMed ID: 877567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Attitudes of deaf adults regarding preferred sign language systems used in the classroom with deaf students. Kautzky-Bowden SM; Gonzales BR Am Ann Deaf; 1987 Oct; 132(4):251-5. PubMed ID: 3442283 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Perceiving minimal distinctions in ASL under normal and point-light display conditions. Tartter VC; Fischer SD Percept Psychophys; 1982 Oct; 32(4):327-34. PubMed ID: 7155778 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Can deaf children acquire English? An evaluation of manually coded English systems in terms of the principles of language acquisition. Mitchell GS Am Ann Deaf; 1982 Jun; 127(3):331-6. PubMed ID: 7113873 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Language codes and sense-making among deaf schoolchildren. Maxwell M; Doyle J J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 1996; 1(2):122-36. PubMed ID: 15579817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]