These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35883418)

  • 1. What Makes GPCRs from Different Families Bind to the Same Ligand?
    Dankwah KO; Mohl JE; Begum K; Leung MY
    Biomolecules; 2022 Jun; 12(7):. PubMed ID: 35883418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving the Modeling of Extracellular Ligand Binding Pockets in RosettaGPCR for Conformational Selection.
    Liessmann F; Künze G; Meiler J
    Int J Mol Sci; 2023 Apr; 24(9):. PubMed ID: 37175495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving virtual screening of G protein-coupled receptors via ligand-directed modeling.
    Coudrat T; Simms J; Christopoulos A; Wootten D; Sexton PM
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Nov; 13(11):e1005819. PubMed ID: 29131821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. G protein-coupled receptor transmembrane binding pockets and their applications in GPCR research and drug discovery: a survey.
    Kratochwil NA; Gatti-McArthur S; Hoener MC; Lindemann L; Christ AD; Green LG; Guba W; Martin RE; Malherbe P; Porter RH; Slack JP; Winnig M; Dehmlow H; Grether U; Hertel C; Narquizian R; Panousis CG; Kolczewski S; Steward L
    Curr Top Med Chem; 2011; 11(15):1902-24. PubMed ID: 21470172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Virtual Screening of Human Class-A GPCRs Using Ligand Profiles Built on Multiple Ligand-Receptor Interactions.
    Chan WKB; Zhang Y
    J Mol Biol; 2020 Aug; 432(17):4872-4890. PubMed ID: 32652079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Structure-Based Virtual Screening for Ligands of G Protein-Coupled Receptors: What Can Molecular Docking Do for You?
    Ballante F; Kooistra AJ; Kampen S; de Graaf C; Carlsson J
    Pharmacol Rev; 2021 Oct; 73(4):527-565. PubMed ID: 34907092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. AlphaFold2 versus experimental structures: evaluation on G protein-coupled receptors.
    He XH; You CZ; Jiang HL; Jiang Y; Xu HE; Cheng X
    Acta Pharmacol Sin; 2023 Jan; 44(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 35778488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A structural chemogenomics analysis of aminergic GPCRs: lessons for histamine receptor ligand design.
    Kooistra AJ; Kuhne S; de Esch IJ; Leurs R; de Graaf C
    Br J Pharmacol; 2013 Sep; 170(1):101-26. PubMed ID: 23713847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 7TM Domain Structure of Adhesion GPCRs.
    de Graaf C; Nijmeijer S; Wolf S; Ernst OP
    Handb Exp Pharmacol; 2016; 234():43-66. PubMed ID: 27832483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability of Docking-Based Virtual Screening for GPCR Ligands with Homology Modeled Structures: A Case Study of the Angiotensin II Type I Receptor.
    Chen H; Fu W; Wang Z; Wang X; Lei T; Zhu F; Li D; Chang S; Xu L; Hou T
    ACS Chem Neurosci; 2019 Jan; 10(1):677-689. PubMed ID: 30265513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. GPCR-IPL score: multilevel featurization of GPCR-ligand interaction patterns and prediction of ligand functions from selectivity to biased activation.
    Kumar S; Teli MK; Kim MH
    Brief Bioinform; 2024 Jan; 25(2):. PubMed ID: 38517694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Virtual screening of GPCRs: an in silico chemogenomics approach.
    Jacob L; Hoffmann B; Stoven V; Vert JP
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Sep; 9():363. PubMed ID: 18775075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Self-docking and cross-docking simulations of G protein-coupled receptor-ligand complexes: Impact of ligand type and receptor activation state.
    Thomas BN; Parrill AL; Baker DL
    J Mol Graph Model; 2022 May; 112():108119. PubMed ID: 34979368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Characterization of Ligand Binding to GPCRs Through Computational Methods.
    Vasile S; Esguerra M; Jespers W; Oliveira A; Sallander J; Åqvist J; Gutiérrez-de-Terán H
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1705():23-44. PubMed ID: 29188557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multi-state modeling of G-protein coupled receptors at experimental accuracy.
    Heo L; Feig M
    Proteins; 2022 Nov; 90(11):1873-1885. PubMed ID: 35510704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new protein binding pocket similarity measure based on comparison of clouds of atoms in 3D: application to ligand prediction.
    Hoffmann B; Zaslavskiy M; Vert JP; Stoven V
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Feb; 11():99. PubMed ID: 20175916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Receptor-ligand docking simulation for membrane proteins].
    Hirokawa T
    Yakugaku Zasshi; 2007 Jan; 127(1):123-31. PubMed ID: 17202792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing GPCR homology models constructed from templates of various transmembrane sequence identities: Binding mode prediction and docking enrichment.
    Loo JSE; Emtage AL; Ng KW; Yong ASJ; Doughty SW
    J Mol Graph Model; 2018 Mar; 80():38-47. PubMed ID: 29306746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficiency of Homology Modeling Assisted Molecular Docking in G-protein Coupled Receptors.
    Bhunia SS; Saxena AK
    Curr Top Med Chem; 2021; 21(4):269-294. PubMed ID: 32901584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Revolutionizing GPCR-ligand predictions: DeepGPCR with experimental validation for high-precision drug discovery.
    Zhang H; Fan H; Wang J; Hou T; Saravanan KM; Xia W; Kan HW; Li J; Zhang JZH; Liang X; Chen Y
    Brief Bioinform; 2024 May; 25(4):. PubMed ID: 38864340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.