These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35883687)

  • 1. ChromoEnhancer: An Artificial-Intelligence-Based Tool to Enhance Neoplastic Karyograms as an Aid for Effective Analysis.
    Bokhari Y; Alhareeri A; Aljouie A; Alkhaldi A; Rashid M; Alawad M; Alhassnan R; Samargandy S; Panahi A; Heidrich W; Arodz T
    Cells; 2022 Jul; 11(14):. PubMed ID: 35883687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Analysis program for quantitative detection of chromosome aberrations using comparative genomic hybridization].
    Roth K; Wolf G; Dietel M; Petersen I
    Pathologe; 1996 Sep; 17(5):342-8. PubMed ID: 8992476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spectral karyotyping refines cytogenetic diagnostics of constitutional chromosomal abnormalities.
    Schröck E; Veldman T; Padilla-Nash H; Ning Y; Spurbeck J; Jalal S; Shaffer LG; Papenhausen P; Kozma C; Phelan MC; Kjeldsen E; Schonberg SA; O'Brien P; Biesecker L; du Manoir S; Ried T
    Hum Genet; 1997 Dec; 101(3):255-62. PubMed ID: 9439652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enhanced Rotated Mask R-CNN for Chromosome Segmentation.
    Wang P; Hu W; Zhang J; Wen Y; Xu C; Qian D
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2021 Nov; 2021():2769-2772. PubMed ID: 34891823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Combating COVID-19 Using Generative Adversarial Networks and Artificial Intelligence for Medical Images: Scoping Review.
    Ali H; Shah Z
    JMIR Med Inform; 2022 Jun; 10(6):e37365. PubMed ID: 35709336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Geometric correction of deformed chromosomes for automatic Karyotyping.
    Khan S; DSouza A; Sanches J; Ventura R
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():4438-41. PubMed ID: 23366912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Experience with the Athena semi-automated karyotyping system.
    Mayall BH; Tucker JD; Christensen ML; van Vliet LJ; Young IT
    Cytometry; 1990; 11(1):59-72. PubMed ID: 2307063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Image analysis for comparative genomic hybridization based on a karyotyping program for windows.
    Roth K; Wolf G; Dietel M; Petersen I
    Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1997 Dec; 19(6):461-74. PubMed ID: 9893900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Chromosome analysis by image processing in a computerized environment. Clinical applications.
    Malet P; Benkhalifa M; Perissel B; Geneix A; Le Corvaisier B
    J Radiat Res; 1992 Mar; 33 Suppl():171-88. PubMed ID: 1507168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 3D conditional generative adversarial networks for high-quality PET image estimation at low dose.
    Wang Y; Yu B; Wang L; Zu C; Lalush DS; Lin W; Wu X; Zhou J; Shen D; Zhou L
    Neuroimage; 2018 Jul; 174():550-562. PubMed ID: 29571715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automatic chromosome pairing using mutual information.
    Khmelinskii A; Ventura R; Sanches J
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():1918-21. PubMed ID: 19163065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Generative Adversarial Networks: A Primer for Radiologists.
    Wolterink JM; Mukhopadhyay A; Leiner T; Vogl TJ; Bucher AM; Išgum I
    Radiographics; 2021; 41(3):840-857. PubMed ID: 33891522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bivariate flow karyotyping of acute myelocytic leukemia in the BNML rat model.
    Arkesteijn GJ; Martens AC; Jonker RR; Hagemeijer A; Hagenbeek A
    Cytometry; 1987 Nov; 8(6):618-24. PubMed ID: 3480794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stylized chromosome images.
    Martin AO; Isenstein BS; Thomas CW; Rzeszotarski MS; Johnson WE
    Cytometry; 1990; 11(1):40-50. PubMed ID: 2307061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An improved deep convolutional neural network architecture for chromosome abnormality detection using hybrid optimization model.
    Nimitha N; Ezhumalai P; Chokkalingam A
    Microsc Res Tech; 2022 Sep; 85(9):3115-3129. PubMed ID: 35708217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Classifier-assisted metric for chromosome pairing.
    Ventura R; Khmelinskii A; Sanches J
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():6729-32. PubMed ID: 21096087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interphase cytogenetics of hematological cancer: comparison of classical karyotyping and in situ hybridization using a panel of eleven chromosome specific DNA probes.
    Poddighe PJ; Moesker O; Smeets D; Awwad BH; Ramaekers FC; Hopman AH
    Cancer Res; 1991 Apr; 51(7):1959-67. PubMed ID: 2004382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Chromosome Recognition.
    Wan TS; Hui EK; Ng MH
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1541():67-74. PubMed ID: 27910015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Subspace-based prototyping and classification of chromosome images.
    Wu Q; Liu Z; Chen T; Xiong Z; Castleman KR
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2005 Sep; 14(9):1277-87. PubMed ID: 16190464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Advances in the detection of chromosomal aberrations using spectral karyotyping.
    Bayani J; Squire JA
    Clin Genet; 2001 Feb; 59(2):65-73. PubMed ID: 11260203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.