These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35885209)

  • 21. An enhanced VIKOR method for multi-criteria group decision-making with complex Fermatean fuzzy sets.
    Akram M; Muhiuddin G; Santos-García G
    Math Biosci Eng; 2022 May; 19(7):7201-7231. PubMed ID: 35730303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Topic selection for health technology assessment: An approach combining multiple attribute decision making and decision rules.
    Mobinizadeh M; Mohamadi E; Arman H; Nasiripour A; Olyaeemanesh A; Mohamadi S
    Med J Islam Repub Iran; 2021; 35():40. PubMed ID: 34211942
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Multi-attribute decision making method using advanced Pythagorean fuzzy weighted geometric operator and their applications for real estate company selection.
    Paul TK; Pal M; Jana C
    Heliyon; 2021 Jun; 7(6):e07340. PubMed ID: 34195440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Integrated MADM of low-carbon structural design for high-end equipment based on attribute reduction considering incomplete interval uncertainties.
    Hong Z; Cui K; Feng Y; Song J; Hu B; Tan J
    Sci Rep; 2024 Aug; 14(1):19649. PubMed ID: 39179673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. TOPSIS-based consensus model for group decision-making with incomplete interval fuzzy preference relations.
    Liu F; Zhang WG
    IEEE Trans Cybern; 2014 Aug; 44(8):1283-94. PubMed ID: 24081882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Groundwater quality assessment based on rough sets attribute reduction and TOPSIS method in a semi-arid area, China.
    Li P; Wu J; Qian H
    Environ Monit Assess; 2012 Aug; 184(8):4841-54. PubMed ID: 21894505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Multi-attribute Cognitive Decision Making via Convex Combination of Weighted Vector Similarity Measures for Single-Valued Neutrosophic Sets.
    Borah G; Dutta P
    Cognit Comput; 2021; 13(4):1019-1033. PubMed ID: 34055097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Upgrading current multi-attribute decision-making with a 3-dimensional decision matrix for future-based decisions.
    Sorooshian S
    MethodsX; 2021; 8():101403. PubMed ID: 34430299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Multiple-attribute group decision making with different formats of preference information on attributes.
    Xu Z
    IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern; 2007 Dec; 37(6):1500-11. PubMed ID: 18179069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An OWA Distance-Based, Single-Valued Neutrosophic Linguistic TOPSIS Approach for Green Supplier Evaluation and Selection in Low-Carbon Supply Chains.
    Chen J; Zeng S; Zhang C
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Jul; 15(7):. PubMed ID: 29986549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An investigation to offer conclusive recommendations on suitable benefit/cost criteria-based normalization methods for TOPSIS.
    Krishnan AR; Hamid MR; Tanakinjal GH; Asli MF; Boniface B; Ghazali MF
    MethodsX; 2023; 10():102227. PubMed ID: 37333510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An approach to MCGDM based on multi-granulation Pythagorean fuzzy rough set over two universes and its application to medical decision problem.
    Sun B; Tong S; Ma W; Wang T; Jiang C
    Artif Intell Rev; 2022; 55(3):1887-1913. PubMed ID: 34376902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Application of an integrated multi-criteria decision making AHP-TOPSIS methodology for ETL software selection.
    Hanine M; Boutkhoum O; Tikniouine A; Agouti T
    Springerplus; 2016; 5():263. PubMed ID: 27006872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Identification of key factors in consumers' adoption behavior of intelligent medical terminals based on a hybrid modified MADM model for product improvement.
    Liu Y; Chen Y; Tzeng GH
    Int J Med Inform; 2017 Sep; 105():68-82. PubMed ID: 28750913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Using multi-criteria decision making for selection of the optimal strategy for municipal solid waste management.
    Jovanovic S; Savic S; Jovicic N; Boskovic G; Djordjevic Z
    Waste Manag Res; 2016 Sep; 34(9):884-95. PubMed ID: 27354012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Attribute based specification, comparison and selection of feed stock for anaerobic digestion using MADM approach.
    Rao PV; Baral SS
    J Hazard Mater; 2011 Feb; 186(2-3):2009-16. PubMed ID: 21247688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Health-Care Waste Treatment Technology Selection Using the Interval 2-Tuple Induced TOPSIS Method.
    Lu C; You JX; Liu HC; Li P
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2016 Jun; 13(6):. PubMed ID: 27271652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Integrated Decision-Making Method for Heterogeneous Attributes Based on Probabilistic Linguistic Cross-Entropy and Priority Relations.
    Wang L; Xue H
    Entropy (Basel); 2020 Sep; 22(9):. PubMed ID: 33286778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A sentiment analysis driven method based on public and personal preferences with correlated attributes to select online doctors.
    Wu J; Zhang G; Xing Y; Liu Y; Zhang Z; Dong Y; Herrera-Viedma E
    Appl Intell (Dordr); 2023 Feb; ():1-22. PubMed ID: 36844914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Selection of optimized air pollutant filtration technologies for petrochemical industries through multiple-attribute decision-making.
    Moridi P; Atabi F; Nouri J; Yarahmadi R
    J Environ Manage; 2017 Jul; 197():456-463. PubMed ID: 28412617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.