These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35886495)

  • 21. The roles of pollution concerns and environmental knowledge in making green food choices: Evidence from Chinese consumers.
    Tong Q; Anders S; Zhang J; Zhang L
    Food Res Int; 2020 Apr; 130():108881. PubMed ID: 32156344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The impact of empathy with nature on green purchase behavior: An ERP study.
    Jing K; Qi M; Mei Y; Chen L
    Neurosci Lett; 2022 Jul; 784():136745. PubMed ID: 35718238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Norm-focused nudges influence pro-environmental choices and moderate post-choice emotional responses.
    Trujillo CA; Estrada-Mejia C; Rosa JA
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(3):e0247519. PubMed ID: 33647050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Analysis of Chinese consumers' willingness and behavioral change to purchase Green agri-food product online.
    Ma L; Li Z; Zheng D
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(4):e0265887. PubMed ID: 35385492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Do environmental knowledge and green trust matter for purchase intention of eco-friendly home appliances? An application of extended theory of planned behavior.
    Asif MH; Zhongfu T; Irfan M; Işık C
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Mar; 30(13):37762-37774. PubMed ID: 36574131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Research on the Influence Path of Online Consumers' Purchase Decision Based on Commitment and Trust Theory.
    You Y; Hu Y; Yang W; Cao S
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():916465. PubMed ID: 36081724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Using an Integrated Social Cognition Model to Explain Green Purchasing Behavior among Adolescents.
    Pakpour AH; Lin CK; Safdari M; Lin CY; Chen SH; Hamilton K
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Dec; 18(23):. PubMed ID: 34886395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Roles of Brand Benefits and Relationship Commitment in Consumers' Social Media Behavior around Sustainable Fashion.
    Choi TR; Ahn J
    Behav Sci (Basel); 2023 May; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 37232623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The interplay between endorser social status and normative appeals on the endorsement effectiveness of pro-environmental behaviors.
    He H; Fu J; Li X; Guo R
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210699. PubMed ID: 30645643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Are non-competitors greener? The effect of consumer awareness differences on green food consumption.
    Zheng M; Zheng Q; Chen J; Tang D
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1276261. PubMed ID: 38111866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Predicting young Chinese consumers' intentions to purchase Western brands: Structural model analysis.
    Long F; Bhuiyan MA; Aziz NA; Rahman MK
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(5):e0267563. PubMed ID: 35522658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Why Do Consumers Make Green Purchase Decisions? Insights from a Systematic Review.
    Zhang X; Dong F
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Sep; 17(18):. PubMed ID: 32932797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Message framing and self-conscious emotions help to understand pro-environment consumer purchase intention: an ERP study.
    Zubair M; Iqbal S; Usman SM; Awais M; Wang R; Wang X
    Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):18304. PubMed ID: 33110155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. On the Factors Influencing Green Purchase Intention: A Meta-Analysis Approach.
    Zhuang W; Luo X; Riaz MU
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():644020. PubMed ID: 33897545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Contrariwise obesity through organic food consumption in Malaysia: a signaling theory perspective.
    Abdullah Z; Putri KYS; Raza SH; Istiyanto SB
    BMC Public Health; 2022 Jan; 22(1):99. PubMed ID: 35031029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Young consumers' motivations and barriers to the purchase of second-hand clothes: An empirical study of China.
    Wang B; Fu Y; Li Y
    Waste Manag; 2022 Apr; 143():157-167. PubMed ID: 35259572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Why are they eco-friendly? Attributing eco-friendly descriptive norms to intrinsic motivation increases pro-environmental purchase intention.
    Ejelöv E; Bergquist M; Hansla A; Nilsson A
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(10):e0265839. PubMed ID: 36264867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Environmental Consciousness and Organic Food Purchase Intention: A Moderated Mediation Model of Perceived Food Quality and Price Sensitivity.
    Wang J; Pham TL; Dang VT
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Jan; 17(3):. PubMed ID: 32013260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Psychological Distance Toward Air Pollution and Purchase Intention for New Energy Vehicles: An Investigation in China.
    Liu W; Zeng L; Wang Q
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():569115. PubMed ID: 33868068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Predicting Consumer Green Product Purchase Attitudes and Behavioral Intention During COVID-19 Pandemic.
    Chen X; Rahman MK; Rana MS; Gazi MAI; Rahaman MA; Nawi NC
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():760051. PubMed ID: 35145450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.