195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35887220)
21. A Molecular Dynamics-Shared Pharmacophore Approach to Boost Early-Enrichment Virtual Screening: A Case Study on Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor α.
Perricone U; Wieder M; Seidel T; Langer T; Padova A; Almerico AM; Tutone M
ChemMedChem; 2017 Aug; 12(16):1399-1407. PubMed ID: 28135036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Rescoring ligand docking poses.
Zhong S; Zhang Y; Xiu Z
Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2010 May; 13(3):326-34. PubMed ID: 20443166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Docking pose selection by interaction pattern graph similarity: application to the D3R grand challenge 2015.
Slynko I; Da Silva F; Bret G; Rognan D
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):669-683. PubMed ID: 27480696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Local Interaction Density (LID), a Fast and Efficient Tool to Prioritize Docking Poses.
Jacquemard C; Tran-Nguyen VK; Drwal MN; Rognan D; Kellenberger E
Molecules; 2019 Jul; 24(14):. PubMed ID: 31323745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Docking of small molecules to farnesoid X receptors using AutoDock Vina with the Convex-PL potential: lessons learned from D3R Grand Challenge 2.
Kadukova M; Grudinin S
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):151-162. PubMed ID: 28913782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Testing assumptions and hypotheses for rescoring success in protein-ligand docking.
O'Boyle NM; Liebeschuetz JW; Cole JC
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Aug; 49(8):1871-8. PubMed ID: 19645429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Advances in Docking.
Sulimov VB; Kutov DC; Sulimov AV
Curr Med Chem; 2019; 26(42):7555-7580. PubMed ID: 30182836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Implementation and evaluation of a docking-rescoring method using molecular footprint comparisons.
Balius TE; Mukherjee S; Rizzo RC
J Comput Chem; 2011 Jul; 32(10):2273-89. PubMed ID: 21541962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Identification of selective MMP-9 inhibitors through multiple e-pharmacophore, ligand-based pharmacophore, molecular docking, and density functional theory approaches.
Jana S; Singh SK
J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2019 Mar; 37(4):944-965. PubMed ID: 29475408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A python-based docking program utilizing a receptor bound ligand shape: PythDock.
Chung JY; Cho SJ; Hah JM
Arch Pharm Res; 2011 Sep; 34(9):1451-8. PubMed ID: 21975806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Beware of machine learning-based scoring functions-on the danger of developing black boxes.
Gabel J; Desaphy J; Rognan D
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2807-15. PubMed ID: 25207678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A Hybrid Docking and Machine Learning Approach to Enhance the Performance of Virtual Screening Carried out on Protein-Protein Interfaces.
Singh N; Villoutreix BO
Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Nov; 23(22):. PubMed ID: 36430841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. PeptoGrid-Rescoring Function for AutoDock Vina to Identify New Bioactive Molecules from Short Peptide Libraries.
Zalevsky AO; Zlobin AS; Gedzun VR; Reshetnikov RV; Lovat ML; Malyshev AV; Doronin II; Babkin GA; Golovin AV
Molecules; 2019 Jan; 24(2):. PubMed ID: 30642123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Large scale free energy calculations for blind predictions of protein-ligand binding: the D3R Grand Challenge 2015.
Deng N; Flynn WF; Xia J; Vijayan RS; Zhang B; He P; Mentes A; Gallicchio E; Levy RM
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):743-751. PubMed ID: 27562018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. ChemFlow_py: a flexible toolkit for docking and rescoring.
Monari L; Galentino K; Cecchini M
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2023 Nov; 37(11):565-572. PubMed ID: 37620503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Protein-specific scoring method for ligand discovery.
Lu IL; Wang H
J Comput Biol; 2012 Nov; 19(11):1215-26. PubMed ID: 23075003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Improving virtual screening results with MM/GBSA and MM/PBSA rescoring.
Sahakyan H
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Jun; 35(6):731-736. PubMed ID: 33983518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Distilling the essential features of a protein surface for improving protein-ligand docking, scoring, and virtual screening.
Zavodszky MI; Sanschagrin PC; Korde RS; Kuhn LA
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2002 Dec; 16(12):883-902. PubMed ID: 12825621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of docking performance: comparative data on docking algorithms.
Kontoyianni M; McClellan LM; Sokol GS
J Med Chem; 2004 Jan; 47(3):558-65. PubMed ID: 14736237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Exploration of the structural requirements of HIV-protease inhibitors using pharmacophore, virtual screening and molecular docking approaches for lead identification.
Islam MA; Pillay TS
J Mol Graph Model; 2015 Mar; 56():20-30. PubMed ID: 25541527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
