These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35887775)

  • 1. Sorting of Odor Dilutions Is a Meaningful Addition to Assessments of Olfactory Function as Suggested by Machine-Learning-Based Analyses.
    Lötsch J; Huster A; Hummel T
    J Clin Med; 2022 Jul; 11(14):. PubMed ID: 35887775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Odor dilution sorting as a clinical test of olfactory function: normative values and reliability data.
    Lötsch J; Wolter A; Hähner A; Hummel T
    Chem Senses; 2024 Jan; 49():. PubMed ID: 38401152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Determination of Retronasal Olfactory Threshold Values.
    Özay H; Çetin AÇ; Ecevit MC
    Laryngoscope; 2021 Jul; 131(7):1608-1614. PubMed ID: 33533495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of olfactory function, age, and gender on trigeminally mediated sensations: a study based on the lateralization of chemosensory stimuli.
    Hummel T; Futschik T; Frasnelli J; Hüttenbrink KB
    Toxicol Lett; 2003 Apr; 140-141():273-80. PubMed ID: 12676474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A machine-learned analysis suggests non-redundant diagnostic information in olfactory subtests.
    Lötsch J; Hummel T
    IBRO Rep; 2019 Jun; 6():64-73. PubMed ID: 30671562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Faster olfactory adaptation in patients with olfactory deficits: an analysis of results from odor threshold testing.
    Chen B; Haehner A; Mahmut MK; Hummel T
    Rhinology; 2020 Oct; 58(5):489-494. PubMed ID: 32478337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Correspondence between three olfactory tests and suprathreshold odor intensity ratings.
    Koskinen S; Vento S; Malmberg H; Tuorila H
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2004 Nov; 124(9):1072-7. PubMed ID: 15513552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Machine-learned analysis of side-differences in odor identification performance.
    Lötsch J; Hummel T
    Neuroscience; 2019 Dec; 422():44-53. PubMed ID: 31689389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of distractors on odor identification.
    Gudziol V; Hummel T
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 Feb; 135(2):143-5. PubMed ID: 19221241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation study of a novel approach for assessment of retronasal olfactory function with combination of odor thresholds and identification.
    Yoshino A; Pellegrino R; Luckett CR; Hummel T
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Oct; 278(10):3847-3856. PubMed ID: 33606083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the efficacy of the 'nasal airflow-inducing manoeuvre' for smell rehabilitation in laryngectomees by means of the Sniffin' Sticks test.
    Haxel BR; Fuchs C; Fruth K; Mann WJ; Lippert BM
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2011 Feb; 36(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 21244643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A simple and reliable method for clinical assessment of odor thresholds.
    Lötsch J; Lange C; Hummel T
    Chem Senses; 2004 May; 29(4):311-7. PubMed ID: 15150144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical significance of results from olfactory testing.
    Gudziol V; Lötsch J; Hähner A; Zahnert T; Hummel T
    Laryngoscope; 2006 Oct; 116(10):1858-63. PubMed ID: 17003712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. High test-retest reliability of the extended version of the "Sniffin' Sticks" test.
    Haehner A; Mayer AM; Landis BN; Pournaras I; Lill K; Gudziol V; Hummel T
    Chem Senses; 2009 Oct; 34(8):705-11. PubMed ID: 19759361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Extended testing across, not within, tasks raises diagnostic accuracy of smell testing in Parkinson's disease.
    Boesveldt S; de Muinck Keizer RJ; Knol DL; Wolters ECh; Berendse HW
    Mov Disord; 2009 Jan; 24(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 18855928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. SMELL-S and SMELL-R: Olfactory tests not influenced by odor-specific insensitivity or prior olfactory experience.
    Hsieh JW; Keller A; Wong M; Jiang RS; Vosshall LB
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Oct; 114(43):11275-11284. PubMed ID: 29073044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A pilot study of the Self-Administered Computerized Olfactory Testing System.
    Jiang RS; Liang KL
    Am J Rhinol Allergy; 2015; 29(2):e55-8. PubMed ID: 25785744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The perception of odor is not a surrogate marker for chemical exposure: a review of factors influencing human odor perception.
    Greenberg MI; Curtis JA; Vearrier D
    Clin Toxicol (Phila); 2013 Feb; 51(2):70-6. PubMed ID: 23387344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of olfactory training on odor identification in patients with traumatic anosmia.
    Jiang RS; Twu CW; Liang KL
    Int Forum Allergy Rhinol; 2019 Nov; 9(11):1244-1251. PubMed ID: 31433573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.