These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35887889)
1. Effect of Scanned Area and Operator on the Accuracy of Dentate Arch Scans with a Single Implant. Marques VR; Çakmak G; Yilmaz H; Abou-Ayash S; Donmez MB; Yilmaz B J Clin Med; 2022 Jul; 11(14):. PubMed ID: 35887889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of scanned area on the accuracy and time of anterior single implant scans: An in vitro study. Yilmaz B; Rizzo Marques V; Guo X; Gouveia D; Abou-Ayash S J Dent; 2021 Jun; 109():103620. PubMed ID: 33647374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of operator experience, scanner type, and scan size on 3D scans. Resende CCD; Barbosa TAQ; Moura GF; Tavares LDN; Rizzante FAP; George FM; Neves FDD; Mendonça G J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):294-299. PubMed ID: 32115221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Scan accuracy and time efficiency of different implant-supported fixed partial denture situations depending on the intraoral scanner and scanned area: An in vitro study. Donmez MB; Mathey A; Gäumann F; Mathey A; Yilmaz B; Abou-Ayash S J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1198-1207. PubMed ID: 36868987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of implant location and operator on the accuracy of implant scans using a combined healing abutment-scan body system. Atalay S; Çakmak G; Donmez MB; Yilmaz H; Kökat AM; Yilmaz B J Dent; 2021 Dec; 115():103855. PubMed ID: 34688778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of six intraoral scanners for scanning complete-arch and 4-unit fixed partial dentures: An in vitro study. Diker B; Tak Ö J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Aug; 128(2):187-194. PubMed ID: 33558056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of the dental arch and number of cutting-off and rescanning mesh holes on the accuracy of implant scans in partially edentulous situations. Gómez-Polo M; Immorlano MG; Cascos-Sánchez R; Ortega R; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Revilla-León M J Dent; 2023 Oct; 137():104667. PubMed ID: 37595865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of complete-arch intraoral scans based on confocal microscopy versus optical triangulation: A comparative in vitro study. Waldecker M; Rues S; Rammelsberg P; Bömicke W J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Sep; 126(3):414-420. PubMed ID: 32950254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of scan extension and starting quadrant on the accuracy of four intraoral scanners for fabricating tooth-supported crowns. Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M; Barmak AB; Yilmaz B; Kois JC; Alonso Pérez-Barquero J J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38641480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Trueness and precision of combined healing abutment-scan body system depending on the scan pattern and implant location: An in-vitro study. Donmez MB; Çakmak G; Atalay S; Yilmaz H; Yilmaz B J Dent; 2022 Sep; 124():104169. PubMed ID: 35661761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of complete-arch implant scanning with 5 different intraoral scanners in terms of trueness and operator experience. Revell G; Simon B; Mennito A; Evans ZP; Renne W; Ludlow M; Vág J J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):632-638. PubMed ID: 33832761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of ambient light conditions on the accuracy and scanning time of seven intraoral scanners in complete-arch implant scans. Ochoa-López G; Cascos R; Antonaya-Martín JL; Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M J Dent; 2022 Jun; 121():104138. PubMed ID: 35461973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Trueness and precision of 5 intraoral scanners for scanning edentulous and dentate complete-arch mandibular casts: A comparative in vitro study. Braian M; Wennerberg A J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Aug; 122(2):129-136.e2. PubMed ID: 30885584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of the 3-dimensional virtual patient representation obtained by using 4 different techniques: An in vitro study. Revilla-León M; Zeitler JM; Barmak AB; Kois JC J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1178-1188. PubMed ID: 35773020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of scan pattern on complete-arch scans with 4 digital scanners. Latham J; Ludlow M; Mennito A; Kelly A; Evans Z; Renne W J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 30982616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of different artificial landmarks and scanning patterns on the complete-arch implant intraoral digital scans. Kanjanasavitree P; Thammajaruk P; Guazzato M J Dent; 2022 Oct; 125():104266. PubMed ID: 35995084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of Complete-Arch Scans Obtained by Intraoral Scanner and Smartphone Three-Dimensional Scanning Applications With Different Smartphone Position Setups: An In Vitro Study. Jiang Y; Long H; Soo SY; Mavani H; Tew IM Cureus; 2024 Jun; 16(6):e63471. PubMed ID: 39077296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Understanding the effect of scan spans on the accuracy of intraoral and desktop scanners. Chen Y; Zhai Z; Watanabe S; Nakano T; Ishigaki S J Dent; 2022 Sep; 124():104220. PubMed ID: 35817227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of the surface humidity, implant angulation, and interimplant distance on the accuracy and scanning time of complete-arch implant scans. Gómez-Polo M; Ortega R; Sallorenzo A; Agustín-Panadero R; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Revilla-León M J Dent; 2022 Dec; 127():104307. PubMed ID: 36162637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of single implant scans with a combined healing abutment-scan body system and different intraoral scanners: An in vitro study. Çakmak G; Donmez MB; Atalay S; Yilmaz H; Kökat AM; Yilmaz B J Dent; 2021 Oct; 113():103773. PubMed ID: 34384842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]