These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3588902)

  • 21. MR imaging of the liver at 1.5 T: value of signal averaging in suppressing motion artifacts.
    Gazelle GS; Saini S; Hahn PF; Goldberg MA; Halpern EF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Aug; 163(2):335-7. PubMed ID: 8037025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Rapid acquisition spin-echo (RASE) MR imaging: a new technique for reduction of artifacts and acquisition time.
    Mirowitz SA; Lee JK; Brown JJ; Eilenberg SS; Heiken JP; Perman WH
    Radiology; 1990 Apr; 175(1):131-5. PubMed ID: 2315472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Two-second MR images: comparison with spin-echo images in 29 patients.
    Utz JA; Herfkens RJ; Johnson CD; Shimakawa A; Pelc N; Glover G; Johnson GA; Spritzer CE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Mar; 148(3):629-33. PubMed ID: 3492897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. T2-weighted MR imaging of the abdomen: fast spin-echo vs conventional spin-echo sequences.
    Catasca JV; Mirowitz SA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jan; 162(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 8273691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. MR imaging of the lungs: value of short TE spin-echo pulse sequences.
    Mayo JR; MacKay A; Müller NL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Nov; 159(5):951-6. PubMed ID: 1414805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sampling bandwidth and fat suppression: effects on long TR/TE MR imaging of the abdomen and pelvis at 1.5 T.
    Mitchell DG; Vinitski S; Rifkin MD; Burk DL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Aug; 153(2):419-25. PubMed ID: 2750630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of HASTE and segmented-HASTE sequences with a T2-weighted fast spin-echo sequence in the screening evaluation of the brain.
    Sugahara T; Korogi Y; Hirai T; Hamatake S; Ikushima I; Shigematu Y; Takahashi M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Nov; 169(5):1401-10. PubMed ID: 9353469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. NMR imaging of the abdomen: technical considerations.
    Buonocore E; Borkowski GP; Pavlicek W; Ngo F
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 Dec; 141(6):1171-8. PubMed ID: 6606313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging: optimization and artifact suppression.
    Mitchell DG
    Top Magn Reson Imaging; 1992 Jun; 4(3):18-34. PubMed ID: 1605953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Surface coil MR imaging of abdominal viscera. Part I. Theory, technique, and initial results.
    Edelman RR; McFarland E; Stark DD; Ferrucci JT; Simeone JF; Wismer G; White EM; Rosen BR; Brady TJ
    Radiology; 1985 Nov; 157(2):425-30. PubMed ID: 4048450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assessment of parallel acquisition techniques in adrenal magnetic resonance imaging: does increased temporal resolution significantly improve visualization of adrenal lesions?
    Boll DT; Hillenbrand CM; Lewin JS; Merkle EM
    Acad Radiol; 2004 Jul; 11(7):809-16. PubMed ID: 15217599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Fast MR imaging of abdomen: application of the QD body coil and low refocusing flip angle.
    Nitatori T; Seki T; Hachiya J; Kassai Y
    Radiat Med; 1995; 13(6):285-9. PubMed ID: 8850369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Abdominal MR imaging: comparison of T2-weighted fast and conventional spin-echo, and contrast-enhanced fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled imaging.
    Low RN; Francis IR; Sigeti JS; Foo TK
    Radiology; 1993 Mar; 186(3):803-11. PubMed ID: 8430191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Improved contrast of enhancing brain lesions using contrast-enhanced T1-weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging.
    Melhem ER; Guidone PL; Jara H; Yucel EK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Apr; 168(4):1091-5. PubMed ID: 9124121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Synthesized MR images: comparison with acquired images.
    Bobman SA; Riederer SJ; Lee JN; Suddarth SA; Wang HZ; MacFall JR
    Radiology; 1985 Jun; 155(3):731-8. PubMed ID: 4001377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Liver metastases: optimization of MR imaging pulse sequences at 1.0 T.
    Paling MR; Abbitt PL; Mugler JP; Brookeman JR
    Radiology; 1988 Jun; 167(3):695-9. PubMed ID: 3363125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Forty-millisecond MR imaging of the abdomen at 2.0 T.
    Saini S; Stark DD; Rzedzian RR; Pykett IL; Rummeny E; Hahn PF; Wittenberg J; Ferrucci JT
    Radiology; 1989 Oct; 173(1):111-6. PubMed ID: 2780996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Magnetic resonance with fat-saturation sequences in studying the upper abdomen: the normal semeiological aspects].
    Zuiani C; Bendini M; Meduri S; Bazzocchi M; Santino P
    Radiol Med; 1996 Apr; 91(4):405-12. PubMed ID: 8643850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Optimizing conventional MR imaging of the spine.
    Rubin JB; Enzmann DR
    Radiology; 1987 Jun; 163(3):777-83. PubMed ID: 3575732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Physical principles of magnetic resonance imaging.
    Seeger LL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 Jul; (244):7-16. PubMed ID: 2663291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.