170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35889823)
1. How the "Are We Drinking Ourselves Sick?" Communication Campaign Built Support for Policy Action on Sugary Drinks in Jamaica.
Christian D; Maharjan M; Kotov A; Cotter T; Mullin S; Nurse V; McGaw B; Chen D; Puri P; Wang S; Negi NS; Murukutla N
Nutrients; 2022 Jul; 14(14):. PubMed ID: 35889823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Results of a Mass Media Campaign in South Africa to Promote a Sugary Drinks Tax.
Murukutla N; Cotter T; Wang S; Cullinan K; Gaston F; Kotov A; Maharjan M; Mullin S
Nutrients; 2020 Jun; 12(6):. PubMed ID: 32586040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ability of a mass media campaign to influence knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors about sugary drinks and obesity.
Boles M; Adams A; Gredler A; Manhas S
Prev Med; 2014 Oct; 67 Suppl 1():S40-5. PubMed ID: 25066020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Are Australians ready for warning labels, marketing bans and sugary drink taxes? Two cross-sectional surveys measuring support for policy responses to sugar-sweetened beverages.
Miller CL; Dono J; Wakefield MA; Pettigrew S; Coveney J; Roder D; Durkin SJ; Wittert G; Martin J; Ettridge KA
BMJ Open; 2019 Jun; 9(6):e027962. PubMed ID: 31248926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The equitable impact of sugary drink taxation structures on sugary drink consumption among Canadians: a modelling study using the 2015 Canadian Community Health Survey-Nutrition.
Smith BT; Warren CM; Anderson LN; Hammond D; Manuel DG; Li Y; Andreacchi AT; Rosella LC; Fu SH; Hobin E
Public Health Nutr; 2024 Apr; 27(1):e121. PubMed ID: 38618932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Potential impact of the adult-targeted LiveLighter "Sugary Drinks" campaign on adolescent consumption: Findings from a national cross-sectional school survey.
Gascoyne C; Scully M; Wakefield M; Morley B
Health Promot J Austr; 2023 Oct; 34(4):759-764. PubMed ID: 36727405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Instrumental Role of Strategic Communication to Counter Industry Marketing Responses to Sugary Drink Taxes Comment on "Understanding Marketing Responses to a Tax on Sugary Drinks: A Qualitative Interview Study in the United Kingdom, 2019".
Murukutla N; Cotter T; Kotov A
Int J Health Policy Manag; 2023; 12():7685. PubMed ID: 37579428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Association of the LiveLighter mass media campaign with consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages: Cohort study.
Morley B; Niven P; Dixon H; Swanson M; Szybiak M; Shilton T; Pratt IS; Slevin T; Wakefield M
Health Promot J Austr; 2019 Dec; 30 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):34-42. PubMed ID: 30903631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The health and financial impacts of a sugary drink tax across different income groups in Canada.
Kao KE; Jones AC; Ohinmaa A; Paulden M
Econ Hum Biol; 2020 Aug; 38():100869. PubMed ID: 32442926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of the San Francisco, CA, Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Health Warning on Consumer Reactions: Implications for Equity from a Randomized Experiment.
Grummon AH; Reimold AE; Hall MG
J Acad Nutr Diet; 2022 Feb; 122(2):363-370.e6. PubMed ID: 34465443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Socioeconomic position and consumption of sugary drinks, sugar-sweetened beverages and 100% juice among Canadians: a cross-sectional analysis of the 2015 Canadian Community Health Survey-Nutrition.
Warren C; Hobin E; Manuel DG; Anderson LN; Hammond D; Jessri M; Arcand J; L'Abbé M; Li Y; Rosella LC; Manson H; Smith BT
Can J Public Health; 2022 Jun; 113(3):341-362. PubMed ID: 35138596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can point-of-sale nutrition information and health warnings encourage reduced preference for sugary drinks?: An experimental study.
Scully M; Morley B; Wakefield M; Dixon H
Appetite; 2020 Jun; 149():104612. PubMed ID: 31981587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Regional Differences in Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Intake among US Adults.
Park S; McGuire LC; Galuska DA
J Acad Nutr Diet; 2015 Dec; 115(12):1996-2002. PubMed ID: 26231057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Association of a Community Campaign for Better Beverage Choices With Beverage Purchases From Supermarkets.
Schwartz MB; Schneider GE; Choi YY; Li X; Harris J; Andreyeva T; Hyary M; Highsmith Vernick N; Appel LJ
JAMA Intern Med; 2017 May; 177(5):666-674. PubMed ID: 28264077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Awareness of and reactions to the health harms of sugary drinks: An online study of U.S. parents.
Carl AE; Taillie LS; Grummon AH; Lazard AJ; Higgins ICA; Sheldon JM; Hall MG
Appetite; 2021 Sep; 164():105234. PubMed ID: 33823230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adolescents report low opposition towards policy options to reduce consumption of sugary drinks.
Miller CL; Dono J; Scully M; Morley B; Ettridge K
Pediatr Obes; 2021 Aug; 16(8):e12775. PubMed ID: 33738982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Electoral campaign contributions: an obstacle to sugary drink industry regulation in Brazil?
Mariath AB; Baraldi LG; Martins APB
Public Health Nutr; 2022 Nov; 25(11):3215-3224. PubMed ID: 34955113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Competing with big business: a randomised experiment testing the effects of messages to promote alcohol and sugary drink control policy.
Scully M; Brennan E; Durkin S; Dixon H; Wakefield M; Barry CL; Niederdeppe J
BMC Public Health; 2017 Dec; 17(1):945. PubMed ID: 29282031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Price impact of taxes on sugary drinks in Brazil.
Pereda P; Garcia CP
Econ Hum Biol; 2020 Dec; 39():100898. PubMed ID: 32622931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of pictorial health warnings on purchases of sugary drinks for children: A randomized controlled trial.
Hall MG; Grummon AH; Higgins ICA; Lazard AJ; Prestemon CE; Avendaño-Galdamez MI; Taillie LS
PLoS Med; 2022 Feb; 19(2):e1003885. PubMed ID: 35104297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
