187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35890905)
1. Assessment of Socket Pressure during Walking in Rapid Fit Prosthetic Sockets.
Sasaki K; Guerra G; Lei Phyu W; Chaisumritchoke S; Sutdet P; Kaewtip S
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jul; 22(14):. PubMed ID: 35890905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sustainable, affordable and functional: reimagining prosthetic liners in resource limited environments.
Miyata Y; Sasaki K; Guerra G; Rattanakoch J
Disabil Rehabil; 2022 Jun; 44(12):2941-2947. PubMed ID: 33167733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interface Pressure System to Compare the Functional Performance of Prosthetic Sockets during the Gait in People with Trans-Tibial Amputation.
Ibarra Aguila S; Sánchez GJ; Sauvain EE; Alemon B; Fuentes-Aguilar RQ; Huegel JC
Sensors (Basel); 2020 Dec; 20(24):. PubMed ID: 33317006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measuring discomfort-An objective method for quantifying peak pressure discomfort and improved fit in adults with transtibial amputation.
Binedell T; Ghazali MFB; Wong C; Subburaj K; Blessing L
PM R; 2023 Apr; 15(4):482-492. PubMed ID: 35233956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Modeling the mechanics of elevated vacuum systems in prosthetic sockets.
Youngblood RT; Hafner BJ; Czerniecki JM; Brzostowski JT; Allyn KJ; Sanders JE
Med Eng Phys; 2020 Oct; 84():75-83. PubMed ID: 32977925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of pressure distributions between two types of sockets in a bulbous stump.
Gholizadeh H; Abu Osman NA; Eshraghi A; Arifin N; Chung TY
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Aug; 40(4):509-16. PubMed ID: 25583929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development of a residuum/socket interface simulator for lower limb prosthetics.
McGrath MP; Gao J; Tang J; Laszczak P; Jiang L; Bader D; Moser D; Zahedi S
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2017 Mar; 231(3):235-242. PubMed ID: 28164748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An Inductive Sensing System to Measure In-Socket Residual Limb Displacements for People Using Lower-Limb Prostheses.
Henrikson KM; Weathersby EJ; Larsen BG; Cagle JC; McLean JB; Sanders JE
Sensors (Basel); 2018 Nov; 18(11):. PubMed ID: 30423932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Northwestern University Flexible Subischial Vacuum Socket for persons with transfemoral amputation-Part 1: Description of technique.
Fatone S; Caldwell R
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Jun; 41(3):237-245. PubMed ID: 28094686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Adjustable sockets may improve residual limb fluid volume retention in transtibial prosthesis users.
Brzostowski JT; Larsen BG; Youngblood RT; Ciol MA; Hafner BJ; Gurrey CJ; McLean JB; Allyn KJ; Sanders JE
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Jun; 43(3):250-256. PubMed ID: 30628522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interface pressures during ambulation using suction and vacuum-assisted prosthetic sockets.
Beil TL; Street GM; Covey SJ
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2002; 39(6):693-700. PubMed ID: 17943671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Literature review of the possible advantages of silicon liner socket use in trans-tibial prostheses.
Baars EC; Geertzen JH
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2005 Apr; 29(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 16180375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of the scale reduction in designing sockets for trans-tibial amputees.
Dakhil N; Tarrade T; Behr M; Mo F; Evin M; Thefenne L; Liu T; Llari M
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2020 Aug; 234(8):761-768. PubMed ID: 32475295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multi-scale semi-analytical model for fatigue life prediction of trans-tibial prosthetic sockets.
Mankai W; Ben Smida B; Chafra M; Ben Cheikh R
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2021 Jun; 235(6):688-700. PubMed ID: 33730909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does actively enlarging socket volume during resting facilitate residual limb fluid volume recovery in trans-tibial prosthesis users?
Larsen BG; McLean JB; Brzostowski JT; Carter R; Allyn KJ; Hafner BJ; Garbini JL; Sanders JE
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2020 Aug; 78():105001. PubMed ID: 32619870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of Dermo and Seal-In X5 prosthetic liners on pressure distributions and reported satisfaction during ramp ambulation in persons with transtibial limb loss.
Ali S; Osman NA; Razak A; Hussain S; Wan Abas WA
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2015 Feb; 51(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 24963603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantification of rectifications for the Northwestern University Flexible Sub-Ischial Vacuum Socket.
Fatone S; Johnson WB; Tran L; Tucker K; Mowrer C; Caldwell R
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Jun; 41(3):251-257. PubMed ID: 28094689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical utility of pressure feedback to socket design and fabrication.
Armitage L; Buller A; Rajan G; Prusty G; Simmons A; Kark L
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2020 Feb; 44(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 31769736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-dimensional printing in prosthetics: Method for managing rapid limb volume change.
Nickel E; Barrons K; Hand B; Cataldo A; Hansen A
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2020 Oct; 44(5):355-358. PubMed ID: 32580681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of trans-tibial amputee suction and vacuum socket conditions.
Board WJ; Street GM; Caspers C
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2001 Dec; 25(3):202-9. PubMed ID: 11860094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
