These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3589131)

  • 1. Imaging capabilities and dose considerations of different mammographic units.
    Galkin BM; Feig SA; Frasca P; Muir HD; Soriano RZ
    Recent Results Cancer Res; 1987; 105():25-30. PubMed ID: 3589131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of mammographic screen-film systems.
    Sickles EA
    Recent Results Cancer Res; 1987; 105():52-7. PubMed ID: 3589132
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical considerations in selection of dedicated mammography units.
    Feig SA; Galkin BM; Muir HD
    Recent Results Cancer Res; 1987; 105():15-8. PubMed ID: 3589129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recent trends in screen-film mammography: technical factors and radiation dose.
    Haus AG
    Recent Results Cancer Res; 1987; 105():37-51. PubMed ID: 3296054
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [A program devoted to dose and quality in mammography (DQM)].
    Rimondi O; Gambaccini M; Indovina P; Candini G
    Radiol Med; 1986 Mar; 72(3):116-20. PubMed ID: 3704212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Controlled single-blind clinical evaluation of low-dose mammographic screen--film systems.
    Sickles EA; Genant HK
    Radiology; 1979 Feb; 130(2):347-51. PubMed ID: 760148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality assurance in mammography.
    Dodd GD
    Cancer; 1989 Dec; 64(12 Suppl):2707-9. PubMed ID: 2819690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of results from quality control of physical parameters and results from clinical evaluation of mammographic images for the mammography screening facilities in Poland.
    Fabiszewska E; Grabska I; Jankowska K; Wesolowska E; Bulski W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):206-9. PubMed ID: 21824870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radiation dose affected by mammographic composition and breast size: first application of a radiation dose management system for full-field digital mammography in Korean women.
    Baek JE; Kang BJ; Kim SH; Lee HS
    World J Surg Oncol; 2017 Feb; 15(1):38. PubMed ID: 28153022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Requirements for quality breast cancer detection. Technical quality control.
    Hendrick RE
    Cancer; 1989 Dec; 64(12 Suppl):2710-7. PubMed ID: 2819691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mammography processor quality assurance.
    Monda LA
    Radiol Technol; 2002; 74(1):46-68; quiz 69-72. PubMed ID: 12362534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new low dose mammography technique.
    Chang CH; Sibala JL; Martin NL; Riley RC
    Rev Interam Radiol; 1977 Apr; 2(2):97-9. PubMed ID: 866902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimation of breast radiation dose in a mammographic system.
    Lee KH; Kandaiya S
    Appl Radiat Isot; 1996 Mar; 47(3):361-3. PubMed ID: 8935969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality control programme in mammography: second level quality controls.
    Nassivera E; Nardin L
    Br J Radiol; 1997 Jun; 70(834):612-8. PubMed ID: 9227255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mismatch in breast and detector size during screening and diagnostic mammography results in increased patient radiation dose.
    Wells CL; Slanetz PJ; Rosen MP
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Jan; 21(1):99-103. PubMed ID: 24331271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reduction of discomfort during mammography utilizing a radiolucent cushioning pad.
    Markle L; Roux S; Sayre JW
    Breast J; 2004; 10(4):345-9. PubMed ID: 15239794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical evaluation of breast dose and the factors affecting breast dose in screen-film mammography.
    Ozdemir A
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2007 Sep; 13(3):134-9. PubMed ID: 17846987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mammography using an ultrahigh-strip-density, stationary, focused grid.
    Dershaw DD; Masterson ME; Malik S; Cruz NM
    Radiology; 1985 Aug; 156(2):541-4. PubMed ID: 4011922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Technical developments in mammography.
    Yaffe MJ; Mainprize JG; Jong RA
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):599-611. PubMed ID: 18849694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Moseley TW
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jun; 59(2):362-79. PubMed ID: 27101241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.