These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3589131)

  • 21. [Particular requirements for the safety of mammographic X-ray equipment and mammographic stereotactic devices JIS Z 4751-2-45: 2006(IEC60601-2-45: 2001)].
    Abe S
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2008 Jul; 64(7):892-6. PubMed ID: 18719311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [New development in mammographic technique: Grid mammography (author's transl)].
    Friedrich M
    Rofo; 1978 Feb; 128(2):207-22. PubMed ID: 147219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Mammographic diagnosis of breast cancer.
    Endo T
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1996 Mar; 23 Suppl 1():8-13. PubMed ID: 8702316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of mammographic screen-film systems.
    Arnold BA; Webster EW; Kalisher L
    Radiology; 1978 Oct; 129(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 693873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparative Dose of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography (CESM), Digital Mammography, and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Phillips J; Mihai G; Hassonjee SE; Raj SD; Palmer MR; Brook A; Zhang D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Oct; 211(4):839-846. PubMed ID: 30063367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cone-beam CT for breast imaging: Radiation dose, breast coverage, and image quality.
    O'Connell A; Conover DL; Zhang Y; Seifert P; Logan-Young W; Lin CF; Sahler L; Ning R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Aug; 195(2):496-509. PubMed ID: 20651210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Low-dose mammography. Application to medical practice.
    Feig SA
    JAMA; 1979 Nov; 242(19):2107-9. PubMed ID: 490795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Quality assurance of mammography in the province of Trent].
    Valentini A; Nassivera E; Voltolini A; Volani M; Gottardi S
    Radiol Med; 1993 Sep; 86(3):240-6. PubMed ID: 8210532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Why MQSA? Why now?
    Arcarese JS
    Radiol Technol; 1994; 66(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 7997527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of mammography radiation dose values obtained from direct incident air kerma measurements with values from measured X-ray spectral data.
    Assiamah M; Nam TL; Keddy RJ
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2005 Apr; 62(4):551-60. PubMed ID: 15701409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mammographic phantom studies with synchrotron radiation.
    Johnston RE; Washburn D; Pisano E; Burns C; Thomlinson WC; Chapman LD; Arfelli F; Gmur NF; Zhong Z; Sayers D
    Radiology; 1996 Sep; 200(3):659-63. PubMed ID: 8756911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mammographic equipment, technique, and quality control.
    Friedrich MA
    Curr Opin Radiol; 1991 Aug; 3(4):571-8. PubMed ID: 1888654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Guideline for the additional test positions according to the EPQC 4th Edition for Digital Mammography Systems].
    Sommer A; Lenzen H; Blaser D; Ehlers SE; Schopphoven S; John C;
    Rofo; 2009 Sep; 181(9):845-50. PubMed ID: 19676011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. High-contrast mammography with a moving grid: assessment of clinical utility.
    Sickles EA; Weber WN
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1986 Jun; 146(6):1137-9. PubMed ID: 3518365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Film-screen combinations in mammography].
    Friedrich M
    Z Lymphol; 1983 Dec; 7(2):92-103. PubMed ID: 6673399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Physics, dosimetry, and quality control in mammography].
    Scielzo G; Maggi S
    Radiol Med; 1993 Nov; 86(5):687-94. PubMed ID: 8272556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Breast tomosynthesis. 3-D mammography reaches the U.S. market.
    Health Devices; 2011 Aug; 40(8):258-62. PubMed ID: 23444531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Operational effectiveness of the "Elektronika" x-ray mammographic microfocusing device].
    Kochetova GP; Rozhkova NI
    Med Tekh; 1986; (2):39-45. PubMed ID: 3702632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Mammography -a guidance level and the present situation of mammographic dose-].
    Terada H
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(2):65-73. PubMed ID: 12766282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Image quality in mammography: physical and technical limitations.
    Nielsen B
    Recent Results Cancer Res; 1987; 105():1-14. PubMed ID: 3296052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.