These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35892214)

  • 1. A sex skew in life-history research: the problem of missing males.
    Archer CR; Paniw M; Vega-Trejo R; Sepil I
    Proc Biol Sci; 2022 Jul; 289(1979):20221117. PubMed ID: 35892214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The evolution of sex peptide: sexual conflict, cooperation, and coevolution.
    Hopkins BR; Perry JC
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2022 Aug; 97(4):1426-1448. PubMed ID: 35249265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Female competition and its evolutionary consequences in mammals.
    Stockley P; Bro-Jørgensen J
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2011 May; 86(2):341-66. PubMed ID: 20636474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Partitioning of resources: the evolutionary genetics of sexual conflict over resource acquisition and allocation.
    Zajitschek F; Connallon T
    J Evol Biol; 2017 Apr; 30(4):826-838. PubMed ID: 28181338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sex roles and sex ratios in animals.
    Kappeler PM; Benhaiem S; Fichtel C; Fromhage L; Höner OP; Jennions MD; Kaiser S; Krüger O; Schneider JM; Tuni C; van Schaik J; Goymann W
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2023 Apr; 98(2):462-480. PubMed ID: 36307924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Male bias in distributions of additive genetic, residual, and phenotypic variances of shared traits.
    Wyman MJ; Rowe L
    Am Nat; 2014 Sep; 184(3):326-37. PubMed ID: 25141142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Consequences of combining sex-specific traits.
    Revathi Venkateswaran V; Roth O; Gokhale CS
    Evolution; 2021 Jun; 75(6):1274-1287. PubMed ID: 33759452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sexual dimorphism in trait variability and its eco-evolutionary and statistical implications.
    Zajitschek SR; Zajitschek F; Bonduriansky R; Brooks RC; Cornwell W; Falster DS; Lagisz M; Mason J; Senior AM; Noble DW; Nakagawa S
    Elife; 2020 Nov; 9():. PubMed ID: 33198888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sex differences in the drivers of reproductive skew in a cooperative breeder.
    Nelson-Flower MJ; Flower TP; Ridley AR
    Mol Ecol; 2018 May; 27(10):2435-2446. PubMed ID: 29663552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bateman's principle and immunity: phenotypically plastic reproductive strategies predict changes in immunological sex differences.
    McKean KA; Nunney L
    Evolution; 2005 Jul; 59(7):1510-7. PubMed ID: 16153036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reproductive skew and selection on female ornamentation in social species.
    Rubenstein DR; Lovette IJ
    Nature; 2009 Dec; 462(7274):786-9. PubMed ID: 20010686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Causes and consequences of an unusually male-biased adult sex ratio in an unmanaged feral horse population.
    Regan CE; Medill SA; Poissant J; McLoughlin PD
    J Anim Ecol; 2020 Dec; 89(12):2909-2921. PubMed ID: 32996590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reproductive skew drives patterns of sexual dimorphism in sponge-dwelling snapping shrimps.
    Chak ST; Duffy JE; Rubenstein DR
    Proc Biol Sci; 2015 Jun; 282(1809):20150342. PubMed ID: 26041357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The past, present and future of reproductive skew theory and experiments.
    Nonacs P; Hager R
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2011 May; 86(2):271-98. PubMed ID: 20545672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Degree of anisogamy is unrelated to the intensity of sexual selection.
    Mokos J; Scheuring I; Liker A; Freckleton RP; Székely T
    Sci Rep; 2021 Sep; 11(1):19424. PubMed ID: 34593863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sex-specific evolution during the diversification of live-bearing fishes.
    Culumber ZW; Tobler M
    Nat Ecol Evol; 2017 Aug; 1(8):1185-1191. PubMed ID: 29046573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reproductive skew theory unified: the general bordered tug-of-war model.
    Shen SF; Kern Reeve H
    J Theor Biol; 2010 Mar; 263(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 19932705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Parentage analysis across age cohorts reveals sex differences in reproductive skew in a group-living cichlid fish, Neolamprologus multifasciatus.
    Bose APH; Dabernig-Heinz J; Koch L; Grimm J; Lang S; Hegedűs B; Banda T; Makasa L; Jordan A; Sefc KM
    Mol Ecol; 2022 Apr; 31(8):2418-2434. PubMed ID: 35170123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sex differences in dispersal and the evolution of helping and harming.
    Johnstone RA; Cant MA
    Am Nat; 2008 Sep; 172(3):318-30. PubMed ID: 18662138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Parentage analysis of Ansell's mole-rat family groups indicates a high reproductive skew despite relatively relaxed ecological constraints on dispersal.
    Patzenhauerová H; Šklíba J; Bryja J; Šumbera R
    Mol Ecol; 2013 Oct; 22(19):4988-5000. PubMed ID: 23992451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.