These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3589241)

  • 1. Use of unequal allocation in survival trials.
    Sposto R; Krailo MD
    Stat Med; 1987 Mar; 6(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 3589241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Magnitude and likelihood of loss resulting from non-stratified randomization.
    Palta M; Amini SB
    Stat Med; 1982; 1(3):267-75. PubMed ID: 7187099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimize the use of minimization with unequal allocation.
    Proschan M; Brittain E; Kammerman L
    Biometrics; 2011 Sep; 67(3):1135-41. PubMed ID: 21281276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Investigating maximum power losses in survival studies with nonstratified randomization.
    Palta M
    Biometrics; 1985 Jun; 41(2):497-504. PubMed ID: 4027324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modified replacement randomization.
    Abel U
    Stat Med; 1987 Mar; 6(2):127-35. PubMed ID: 3589242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adaptive allocation in randomized controlled trials.
    Birkett NJ
    Control Clin Trials; 1985 Jun; 6(2):146-55. PubMed ID: 4006488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Covariate imbalance and random allocation in clinical trials.
    Senn SJ
    Stat Med; 1989 Apr; 8(4):467-75. PubMed ID: 2727470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sequence balance minimisation: minimising with unequal treatment allocations.
    Madurasinghe VW
    Trials; 2017 May; 18(1):207. PubMed ID: 28468678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Testing for a treatment effect in the presence of nonresponders.
    Boos DD; Brownie C
    Biometrics; 1986 Mar; 42(1):191-7. PubMed ID: 3719056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing sample size formulae for trials with unbalanced allocation using the logrank test.
    Hsieh FY
    Stat Med; 1992 Jun; 11(8):1091-8. PubMed ID: 1496196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bayesian adaptive biased-coin designs for clinical trials with normal responses.
    Atkinson AC; Biswas A
    Biometrics; 2005 Mar; 61(1):118-25. PubMed ID: 15737084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of data arising from a stratified design with the cluster as unit of randomization.
    Donner A; Donald A
    Stat Med; 1987; 6(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 3576016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of unbalanced randomization on the progressively censored Savage test.
    Lesser ML
    Stat Med; 1982; 1(3):277-80. PubMed ID: 7187100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. New algorithm for treatment allocation reduced selection bias and loss of power in small trials.
    Hofmeijer J; Anema PC; van der Tweel I
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 61(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 18177784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Graphical displays for clarifying how allocation ratio affects total sample size for the two sample logrank test.
    Saville BR; Kim YS; Koch GG
    Pharm Stat; 2011; 10(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 20077513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The emperor (or, rather, his statistician) has new clothes..
    Wheeler JM
    Fertil Steril; 1990 Feb; 53(2):220-2. PubMed ID: 2404803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of treatment allocation procedures on nominal significance levels and bias.
    Kalish LA; Begg CB
    Control Clin Trials; 1987 Jun; 8(2):121-35. PubMed ID: 3608506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A randomization list generator for biomedical experiments.
    Rundell BA; Brown BW; Herson J
    Comput Programs Biomed; 1982 Apr; 14(2):171-4. PubMed ID: 7044673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biostatistical methods for demonstrating efficacy in the regulatory setting. An epistemological approach to adaptive designs.
    Koch A
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2005 May; 48(5):572-9. PubMed ID: 15887068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mass weighted urn design--A new randomization algorithm for unequal allocations.
    Zhao W
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2015 Jul; 43():209-16. PubMed ID: 26091947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.