These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35894571)

  • 1. Regressive Federalism, Rights Reversals, and the Public's Health.
    Hodge JG; Piatt JL; Barraza L; White EN
    J Law Med Ethics; 2022; 50(2):375-379. PubMed ID: 35894571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Substantial Shifts in Supreme Court Health Law Jurisprudence.
    Gostin LO; Hodge JG
    JAMA; 2018 Oct; 320(14):1431-1432. PubMed ID: 30193377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Jacobson v Massachusetts at 100 years: police power and civil liberties in tension.
    Gostin LO
    Am J Public Health; 2005 Apr; 95(4):576-81. PubMed ID: 15798112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Jacobson v Massachusetts: it's not your great-great-grandfather's public health law.
    Mariner WK; Annas GJ; Glantz LH
    Am J Public Health; 2005 Apr; 95(4):581-90. PubMed ID: 15798113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Individual rights versus the public's health--100 years after Jacobson v. Massachusetts.
    Parmet WE; Goodman RA; Farber A
    N Engl J Med; 2005 Feb; 352(7):652-4. PubMed ID: 15716558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Troubling Court Decision for Reproductive Rights: Legal Recognition of Fetal Standing to Sue.
    Fox D; Adashi EY; Cohen IG
    JAMA; 2019 Jul; 322(1):23-24. PubMed ID: 31116380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Supreme Court's spring term: abortion, the right to die, and the decline of privacy rights.
    Wing KR
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1990; 15(4):919-28. PubMed ID: 2081895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Constitutional analysis of the Baby M decision.
    Stark B
    Harv Womens Law J; 1988; 11():19-52. PubMed ID: 16100827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Judicial Power and Influence on Population Health.
    Gostin LO
    Milbank Q; 2023 Apr; 101(S1):700-733. PubMed ID: 37096625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assisted reproductive technologies and the Constitution.
    Coleman CH
    Fordham Urban Law J; 2002 Nov; 30(1):57-70. PubMed ID: 15868662
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is there a constitutional right to clone?
    Sunstein CR
    Hastings Law J; 2002 Jul; 53(5):987-1005. PubMed ID: 15508211
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vigilante Injustice - Deputizing and Weaponizing the Public to Stop Abortions.
    Charo RA
    N Engl J Med; 2021 Oct; 385(16):1441-1443. PubMed ID: 34551227
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A woman decides: Justice O'Connor and due process rights of choice.
    Davis PC; Gilligan C
    McGeorge Law Rev; 2001; 32(3):895-914. PubMed ID: 16493803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contraception at risk.
    The Editors
    N Engl J Med; 2014 Jan; 370(1):77-8. PubMed ID: 24328442
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Public health theory and practice in the constitutional design.
    Gostin LO
    Health Matrix Clevel; 2001; 11(2):265-326. PubMed ID: 11683045
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cloning and federalism.
    Bhagwat A
    Hastings Law J; 2002 Jul; 53(5):1133-41. PubMed ID: 15508222
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A neo-institutional analysis of the hidden interaction between the Israeli Supreme Court and the Ministry of Finance: the right to healthcare services.
    Sperling D; Cohen N
    Isr J Health Policy Res; 2018 Nov; 7(1):71. PubMed ID: 30482250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Morgentaler v. The Queen in the Supreme Court of Canada.
    Martin SL
    Can J Women Law; 1987-1988; 2(2):422-31. PubMed ID: 17076040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Federal and state public health authority and mandatory vaccination: is Jacobson v Massachusetts still valid?
    Marshall LW; Marshall BL; Valladares G
    Am J Disaster Med; 2010; 5(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 20496643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The rhetoric of disrespect: uncovering the faulty premises infecting reproductive rights.
    Reilly EA
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 1996; 5(1):147-205. PubMed ID: 16594108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.