These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3589475)

  • 1. Speech discrimination tests with hearing aids in tele-coil listening mode. A comparative study in school children.
    Pettersson E
    Scand Audiol; 1987; 16(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 3589475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Telephone listening ability for hearing-impaired individuals.
    Holmes AE; Frank T
    Ear Hear; 1984; 5(2):96-100. PubMed ID: 6724177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of hearing aid fitting based on the patients' experiences from everyday listening conditions.
    Tonning FM
    Scand Audiol; 1978; 7(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 756062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss and personal hearing AIDS on cortical event-related potential and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing.
    Korczak PA; Kurtzberg D; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2005 Apr; 26(2):165-85. PubMed ID: 15809543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variable-speech-rate audiometry for hearing aid evaluation.
    Hosoi H; Tsuta Y; Nishida T; Murata K; Ohta F; Mekata T; Kato Y
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 1999 Jan; 26(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 10077252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. German Oldenburg Sentence Test for Children: a useful speech audiometry tool for hearing-impaired children at kindergarten and school age.
    Weißgerber T; Baumann U; Brand T; Neumann K
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2012; 64(5):227-33. PubMed ID: 23038083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech pattern audiometry in hearing impaired children.
    Mac Ardle B; Hazan V; Prasher D
    Br J Audiol; 1999 Dec; 33(6):383-93. PubMed ID: 10656599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of amplification on the discrimination of dichotic consonant-vowel syllables in a population with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Jacobson JT; McCandless GA; Mahoney TM
    Audiology; 1979; 18(6):522-36. PubMed ID: 526197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The relationship between listening conditions and alternative amplification schemes for multiple memory hearing aids.
    Keidser G
    Ear Hear; 1995 Dec; 16(6):575-86. PubMed ID: 8747807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Suitability of speech audiometry study procedures for current demands in clinical and general practice].
    von Wedel H
    HNO; 1986 Feb; 34(2):71-4. PubMed ID: 3957726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Children's speech recognition in noise using omni-directional and dual-microphone hearing aid technology.
    Gravel JS; Fausel N; Liskow C; Chobot J
    Ear Hear; 1999 Feb; 20(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 10037061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Influence of hearing aids on monosyllabic test score and subjective everyday hearing].
    Thümmler R; Liebscher T; Hoppe U
    HNO; 2016 Aug; 64(8):595-600. PubMed ID: 27126291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relationships among speech perception, production, language, hearing loss, and age in children with impaired hearing.
    Blamey PJ; Sarant JZ; Paatsch LE; Barry JG; Bow CP; Wales RJ; Wright M; Psarros C; Rattigan K; Tooher R
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Apr; 44(2):264-85. PubMed ID: 11324650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses as an Objective Aided Outcome Measure: Effect of Stimulus Level, Bandwidth, and Amplification in Adults With Hearing Loss.
    Easwar V; Purcell DW; Aiken SJ; Parsa V; Scollie SD
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):635-52. PubMed ID: 26226606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Children's speech recognition scores: the Speech Intelligibility Index and proficiency factors for age and hearing level.
    Scollie SD
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):543-56. PubMed ID: 18469717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The time course and magnitude of perceptual acclimatization to frequency responses: evidence from monaural fitting of hearing aids.
    Gatehouse S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Sep; 92(3):1258-68. PubMed ID: 1401514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. New developments in speech pattern element hearing aids for the profoundly deaf.
    Faulkner A; Walliker JR; Howard IS; Ball V; Fourcin AJ
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():124-35. PubMed ID: 8153558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of outcomes in children with hearing aids and cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Olds J; Gaboury I; McCrae R; Schramm D; Durieux-Smith A
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2012 Feb; 13(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 22340747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech recognition ability of children with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss as a function of amplification, speech stimuli and listening condition.
    Kenworthy OT; Klee T; Tharpe AM
    Ear Hear; 1990 Aug; 11(4):264-70. PubMed ID: 2210100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.