These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3589478)

  • 1. Speech understanding and directional hearing for hearing-impaired subjects with in-the-ear and behind-the-ear hearing aids.
    Leeuw AR; Dreschler WA
    Scand Audiol; 1987; 16(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 3589478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech recognition with in-the-ear and behind-the-ear dual-microphone hearing instruments.
    Pumford JM; Seewald RC; Scollie SD; Jenstad LM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2000 Jan; 11(1):23-35. PubMed ID: 10741354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of compression and hearing aid style on directional hearing aid benefit and performance.
    Ricketts T; Lindley G; Henry P
    Ear Hear; 2001 Aug; 22(4):348-61. PubMed ID: 11527041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Binaurality in middle ear implant recipients using contralateral digital hearing AIDS.
    Saliba I; Calmels MN; Wanna G; Iversenc G; James C; Deguine O; Fraysse B
    Otol Neurotol; 2005 Jul; 26(4):680-5. PubMed ID: 16015168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A new hearing aid variant. Preliminary evaluation.
    Türk R
    Scand Audiol; 1987; 16(4):179-85. PubMed ID: 3438699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of hearing aids on speech discrimination in noise by normal-hearing listeners.
    McAlister PV
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1990; 27(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 2308083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predictability of speech-in-noise performance from real ear measures of directional hearing AIDS.
    Dhar S; Humes LE; Calandruccio L; Barlow NN; Hipskind N
    Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):147-58. PubMed ID: 15064660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Directivity and noise reduction in hearing aids: speech perception and benefit.
    Quintino CA; Mondelli MF; Ferrari DV
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2010; 76(5):630-8. PubMed ID: 20963348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
    Ricketts T; Henry P; Gnewikow D
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of head angle on monaural and binaural performance with directional and omnidirectional hearing aids.
    Ricketts T
    Ear Hear; 2000 Aug; 21(4):318-28. PubMed ID: 10981608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improvement of speech perception in quiet and in noise without decreasing localization abilities with the bone conduction device Bonebridge.
    Weiss R; Leinung M; Baumann U; Weißgerber T; Rader T; Stöver T
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 May; 274(5):2107-2115. PubMed ID: 28032241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hearing performance in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users after upgrade to a single-unit speech processor.
    Mertens G; Hofkens A; Punte AK; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jan; 36(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 25406874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Noise reduction results of an adaptive filtering technique for dual-microphone behind-the-ear hearing aids.
    Maj JB; Wouters J; Moonen M
    Ear Hear; 2004 Jun; 25(3):215-29. PubMed ID: 15179113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of microphone location in ITE versus BTE hearing aids.
    Gartrell EL; Church GT
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1990 Jul; 1(3):151-3. PubMed ID: 2132598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An adaptive noise canceller for hearing aids using two nearby microphones.
    Vanden Berghe J; Wouters J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jun; 103(6):3621-6. PubMed ID: 9637043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spectrotemporal Modulation Sensitivity as a Predictor of Speech-Reception Performance in Noise With Hearing Aids.
    Bernstein JG; Danielsson H; Hällgren M; Stenfelt S; Rönnberg J; Lunner T
    Trends Hear; 2016 Nov; 20():. PubMed ID: 27815546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.
    Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W
    Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of in-the-ear and over-the-ear hearing aid fittings.
    Cox RM; Risberg DM
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1986 Nov; 51(4):362-9. PubMed ID: 3773492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: Influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario.
    Neher T; Wagener KC; Latzel M
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():36-48. PubMed ID: 28783570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Advantages of directional hearing aid microphones related to room acoustics.
    Leeuw AR; Dreschler WA
    Audiology; 1991; 30(6):330-44. PubMed ID: 1772383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.