These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3589480)

  • 1. Effects of low-frequency components and analog filtering on auditory brainstem responses. A comparison of analog and digital filtering.
    Svensson O; Almqvist B; Jönsson KE
    Scand Audiol; 1987; 16(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 3589480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analogue and digital filtering of auditory brainstem responses.
    Doyle DJ; Hyde ML
    Scand Audiol; 1981; 10(2):81-9. PubMed ID: 7280545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Brainstem responses to tone pip and click stimuli.
    Bauch CD; Rose DE; Harner SG
    Ear Hear; 1980; 1(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 7409354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of high-pass filtering on the detection of the auditory brainstem response.
    Mason SM
    Br J Audiol; 1984 Aug; 18(3):155-61. PubMed ID: 6487849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digital filtering and spectral analysis of the low intensity ABR.
    Kavanagh KT; Domico WD; Franks R; Han JC
    Ear Hear; 1988 Feb; 9(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 3342945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Auditory brainstem responses to middle- and low-frequency tone pips.
    Maurizi M; Paludetti G; Ottaviani F; Rosignoli M
    Audiology; 1984; 23(1):75-84. PubMed ID: 6704061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Novel Paradigm to Record Bilateral Click-Evoked Auditory Brainstem Responses Simultaneously (BiSi-ABR).
    Maruthy S; Gnanateja GN; Sebastian C; Sruthi K
    J Int Adv Otol; 2018 Dec; 14(3):412-417. PubMed ID: 30541707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three frequency component waveforms of auditory evoked brainstem response in spinocerebellar degeneration.
    Yokoyama J; Aoyagi M; Suzuki T; Kiren T; Koike Y
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1994; 511():52-5. PubMed ID: 8203243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Highpass filtering of auditory evoked brain stem potentials (author's transl)].
    Kiessling J; Althaus V
    Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1981; 230(2):149-59. PubMed ID: 7295174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving brain stem auditory evoked potential recordings by digital filtering.
    Møller AR
    Ear Hear; 1983; 4(2):108-13. PubMed ID: 6840414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory brainstem and middle latency evoked response sensitivity near threshold.
    Musiek FE; Geurkink NA
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1981; 90(3 Pt 1):236-40. PubMed ID: 7271128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital inverse filtering of distorted auditory brainstem responses.
    Doyle DJ; Hyde ML
    Scand Audiol; 1981; 10(4):261-3. PubMed ID: 7323677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The contribution of inferior colliculus activity to the auditory brainstem response (ABR) in mice.
    Land R; Burghard A; Kral A
    Hear Res; 2016 Nov; 341():109-118. PubMed ID: 27562195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory brainstem and middle latency responses. I. Effect of response filtering and waveform identification. II. Threshold responses to a 500-HZ tone pip.
    Kavanagh KT; Harker LA; Tyler RS
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1984; 108():1-12. PubMed ID: 6421220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory brainstem evoked potentials peak identification by finite impulse response digital filters.
    Pratt H; Urbach D; Bleich N
    Audiology; 1989; 28(5):272-83. PubMed ID: 2803115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The frequency specificity of tone-pip evoked auditory brain stem responses.
    Kileny P
    Ear Hear; 1981; 2(6):270-5. PubMed ID: 7308602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory brainstem response in neonates during the first 48 hours after birth.
    Mjøen S; Qvigstad E
    Scand Audiol; 1983; 12(1):43-5. PubMed ID: 6844870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Frequency specificity of the auditory brainstem responses in the cat.
    Mair IW; Laukli E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1985; 99(3-4):377-83. PubMed ID: 4013727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Effect of stimulus rise time and high-pass masking on early auditory evoked potentials].
    Bunke D; von Specht H; Mühler R; Pethe J; Kevanishvili Z
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Apr; 77(4):185-90. PubMed ID: 9592750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of the three-dimensional auditory brainstem response and the conventional auditory brainstem response in children.
    Yasuhara A; Hori A
    Brain Dev; 2002 Dec; 24(8):750-7. PubMed ID: 12453598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.