259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35895121)
1. Contrast-enhanced mammography-guided biopsy: technical feasibility and first outcomes.
Alcantara R; Posso M; Pitarch M; Arenas N; Ejarque B; Iotti V; Besutti G
Eur Radiol; 2023 Jan; 33(1):417-428. PubMed ID: 35895121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MRI only detected lesions: Can contrast enhanced mammography guided biopsy be an alternative method: Initial clinical findings.
Aribal E; Guldogan N; Seker ME; Yilmaz E; Turk EB
Eur J Radiol; 2024 Apr; 173():111373. PubMed ID: 38364588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contrast-enhanced Mammography-guided Biopsy: Initial Trial and Experience.
Kowalski A; Arefan D; Ganott MA; Harnist K; Kelly AE; Lu A; Nair BE; Sumkin JH; Vargo A; Berg WA; Zuley ML
J Breast Imaging; 2023 Mar; 5(2):148-158. PubMed ID: 38416936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Utility of MRI-Directed Contrast-Enhanced Mammography for Biopsy Planning for Suspicious MRI-Detected Breast Lesions.
Nida BA; Rooney TB; Miller MM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Feb; 220(2):202-211. PubMed ID: 36000664
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Utility of Targeted Ultrasound to Predict Malignancy Among Lesions Detected on Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography.
Coffey K; Sung J; Comstock C; Askin G; Jochelson MS; Morris EA; D'Alessio D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Sep; 217(3):595-604. PubMed ID: 33025811
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Challenging Contrast-Enhanced Mammography-Guided Biopsies: Practical Approach Using Real-Time Multimodality Imaging and a Proposed Procedural Algorithm.
Weaver OO; Yang WT; Scoggins ME; Adrada BE; Arribas E; Moseley TW; Esquivel J; Melgar Y; Kornecki A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Apr; 220(4):512-523. PubMed ID: 36321982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contrast-Enhanced Mammography-Guided Biopsy: Preliminary Results of a Single-Center Retrospective Experience.
Sammarra M; Piccolo CL; Sarli M; Stefanucci R; Tommasiello M; Orsaria P; Altomare V; Beomonte Zobel B
J Clin Med; 2024 Feb; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 38398247
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Contrast-enhanced mammography-guided biopsy: technique and initial outcomes.
Tang YC; Cheung YC
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2023 Aug; 13(8):5349-5354. PubMed ID: 37581028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound-guided biopsy of suspicious breast lesions on contrast-enhanced mammography and contrast-enhanced MRI: a case series.
Huang PY; Tsai MY; Huang JS; Lin PY; Chou CP
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2023 Oct; 50(4):521-529. PubMed ID: 37493921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contrast-enhanced mammography for the assessment of screening recalls: a two-centre study.
Cozzi A; Schiaffino S; Fanizza M; Magni V; Menicagli L; Monaco CG; Benedek A; Spinelli D; Di Leo G; Di Giulio G; Sardanelli F
Eur Radiol; 2022 Nov; 32(11):7388-7399. PubMed ID: 35648209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Post-clip placement MRI following second-look US-guided core biopsy for suspicious lesions identified on breast MRI.
Song SE; Cho N; Han W
Eur Radiol; 2017 Dec; 27(12):5196-5203. PubMed ID: 28687909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contrast-Enhanced Mammography-Guided Breast Biopsy: Single-Center Experience.
Kornecki A; Bhaduri M; Khan N; Nachum IB; Muscedere G; Shmuilovich O; Lynn K; Nano E; Blyth L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Jun; 220(6):826-827. PubMed ID: 36722757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Added value of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) in staging of malignant breast lesions-a feasibility study.
Åhsberg K; Gardfjell A; Nimeus E; Rasmussen R; Behmer C; Zackrisson S; Ryden L
World J Surg Oncol; 2020 May; 18(1):100. PubMed ID: 32438917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Safety and Efficacy of Magnetic Resonance-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Large-Volume Breast Biopsy (MR-Guided VALB).
Schrading S; Strobel K; Keulers A; Dirrichs T; Kuhl CK
Invest Radiol; 2017 Mar; 52(3):186-193. PubMed ID: 27861232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contrast Enhanced Mammography in Routine Clinical Practice: Frequency and Malignancy Rates of Enhancing Otherwise Occult Findings.
Viggiano T; Scott R; Sharpe R; Kasper C; Mazza G; Pizzitola V; Giurescu M; Lorans R; Eversman W; Patel BK
Clin Breast Cancer; 2022 Oct; 22(7):e736-e744. PubMed ID: 35977855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Digital Mammography Stereotactic Biopsy versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis-guided Biopsy: Differences in Biopsy Targets, Pathologic Results, and Discordance Rates.
Rochat CJ; Baird GL; Lourenco AP
Radiology; 2020 Mar; 294(3):518-527. PubMed ID: 31961261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Digital breast tomosynthesis-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: initial experiences and comparison with prone stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy.
Schrading S; Distelmaier M; Dirrichs T; Detering S; Brolund L; Strobel K; Kuhl CK
Radiology; 2015 Mar; 274(3):654-62. PubMed ID: 25386875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A cohort study of mammography-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in patients with compressed thin breasts (≦ 3 cm).
Yeow YJ; Yu CC; Cheung YC; Chen SC
Asian J Surg; 2023 Oct; 46(10):4296-4301. PubMed ID: 37150735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. False-Positive and False-Negative Contrast-enhanced Mammograms: Pitfalls and Strategies to Improve Cancer Detection.
Carnahan MB; Harper L; Brown PJ; Bhatt AA; Eversman S; Sharpe RE; Patel BK
Radiographics; 2023 Dec; 43(12):e230100. PubMed ID: 38032823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Upright Digital Breast Tomosynthesis-guided versus Prone Stereotactic Vacuum-assisted Breast Biopsy.
Bahl M; Maunglay M; D'Alessandro HA; Lehman CD
Radiology; 2019 Feb; 290(2):298-304. PubMed ID: 30511909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
