These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35896895)

  • 1. Comparison of MECHANISM of early and late vascular responses following treatment of ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction with two different everolimus-eluting stents: a randomized controlled trial of biodegradable versus durable polymer stents.
    Otake H; Ishida M; Nakano S; Higuchi Y; Hibi K; Kuriyama N; Iwasaki M; Kataoka T; Kubo T; Tsujita K; Ashikaga T; Shinke T; Itoh T; Kimura T; Morino Y;
    Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2023 Jan; 38(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 35896895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Angioscopic Comparison of Early- and Mid-Term Vascular Responses Following Treatment of ST-Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction With Biodegradable vs. Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents　- A Prespecified Subanalysis of the MECHANISM AMI RCT.
    Nakatani S; Sotomi Y; Suzuki S; Kobayashi T; Hamanaka Y; Omatsu T; Ishida M; Kakizaki S; Otake H; Morino Y; Higuchi Y;
    Circ J; 2023 Apr; 87(5):619-628. PubMed ID: 36418112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable stent vs. durable polymer everolimus-eluting metallic stent in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results of the randomized ABSORB ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction-TROFI II trial.
    Sabaté M; Windecker S; Iñiguez A; Okkels-Jensen L; Cequier A; Brugaletta S; Hofma SH; Räber L; Christiansen EH; Suttorp M; Pilgrim T; Anne van Es G; Sotomi Y; García-García HM; Onuma Y; Serruys PW
    Eur Heart J; 2016 Jan; 37(3):229-40. PubMed ID: 26405232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biodegradable- Versus Durable-Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents for STEMI: Final 2-Year Outcomes of the BIOSTEMI Trial.
    Pilgrim T; Muller O; Heg D; Roffi M; Kurz DJ; Moarof I; Weilenmann D; Kaiser C; Tapponnier M; Losdat S; Eeckhout E; Valgimigli M; Jüni P; Windecker S; Iglesias JF
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Mar; 14(6):639-648. PubMed ID: 33727005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention with thin-strut biodegradable versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: A subgroup analysis of the BIOSTEMI randomized trial.
    Iglesias JF; Muller O; Losdat S; Roffi M; Kurz DJ; Weilenmann D; Kaiser C; Heg D; Valgimigli M; Windecker S; Pilgrim T
    Int J Cardiol; 2021 Jul; 334():37-41. PubMed ID: 33887341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Complex primary percutaneous coronary intervention with ultrathin-strut biodegradable versus thin-strut durable polymer drug-eluting stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: A subgroup analysis from the BIOSTEMI randomized trial.
    Iglesias JF; Muller O; Losdat S; Roffi M; Kurz DJ; Weilenmann D; Kaiser C; Heg D; Windecker S; Pilgrim T
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2023 Mar; 101(4):687-700. PubMed ID: 36807456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of 6-month vascular healing response after bioresorbable polymer versus durable polymer drug-eluting stent implantation in patients with acute coronary syndromes: A randomized serial optical coherence tomography study.
    Noguchi M; Dohi T; Okazaki S; Matsumura M; Takeuchi M; Endo H; Kato Y; Okai I; Nishiyama H; Doi S; Iwata H; Isoda K; Usui E; Fujimura T; Seike F; Mintz GS; Miyauchi K; Daida H; Minamino T; Maehara A
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Nov; 98(5):E677-E686. PubMed ID: 34357673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Very early neointimal coverage of new biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stent compared with durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent evaluated by optical frequency domain imaging.
    Kobayashi N; Ito Y; Yamawaki M; Araki M; Sakai T; Sakamoto Y; Mori S; Tsutsumi M; Nauchi M; Honda Y; Tokuda T; Makino K; Shirai S; Hirano K
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Apr; 34(4):515-522. PubMed ID: 29159531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (BIOSTEMI): a single-blind, prospective, randomised superiority trial.
    Iglesias JF; Muller O; Heg D; Roffi M; Kurz DJ; Moarof I; Weilenmann D; Kaiser C; Tapponnier M; Stortecky S; Losdat S; Eeckhout E; Valgimigli M; Odutayo A; Zwahlen M; Jüni P; Windecker S; Pilgrim T
    Lancet; 2019 Oct; 394(10205):1243-1253. PubMed ID: 31488372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: Final 5-Year Report From the COMPARE II Trial (Abluminal Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent).
    Vlachojannis GJ; Smits PC; Hofma SH; Togni M; Vázquez N; Valdés M; Voudris V; Slagboom T; Goy JJ; den Heijer P; van der Ent M
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Jun; 10(12):1215-1221. PubMed ID: 28579236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Five-Year Outcomes in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Treated With Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents.
    Iglesias JF; Heg D; Roffi M; Tüller D; Lanz J; Rigamonti F; Muller O; Moarof I; Cook S; Weilenmann D; Kaiser C; Cuculi F; Valgimigli M; Jüni P; Windecker S; Pilgrim T
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2019 Nov; 8(22):e013607. PubMed ID: 31696762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Early Vascular Healing Following Bioresorbable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Placement Compared to That with Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent.
    Ogura K; Tsujita H; Oishi Y; Matsumoto H; Matsukawa N; Sakai R; Arai T; Sato S; Tanaka H; Masaki R; Arai K; Nomura K; Kosaki R; Sakai K; Sekimoto T; Kondo S; Tsukamoto S; Mori H; Yamamoto MH; Wakabayashi K; Suzuki H; Ochiai M; Shinke T
    Int Heart J; 2021 May; 62(3):510-519. PubMed ID: 33994509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization: 2-Year Results of the BIOSCIENCE Trial.
    Zbinden R; Piccolo R; Heg D; Roffi M; Kurz DJ; Muller O; Vuilliomenet A; Cook S; Weilenmann D; Kaiser C; Jamshidi P; Franzone A; Eberli F; Jüni P; Windecker S; Pilgrim T
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2016 Mar; 5(3):e003255. PubMed ID: 26979080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the vessel healing process after everolimus-eluting stent and bare metal stent implantations in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
    Yano H; Horinaka S; Watahik M; Watanabe T; Ishimitsu T
    Heart Vessels; 2019 Apr; 34(4):572-582. PubMed ID: 30392104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Early vascular healing with rapid breakdown biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents assessed by optical coherence tomography.
    Tada T; Byrne RA; Schuster T; Cuni R; Kitabata H; Tiroch K; Dirninger A; Gratze F; Kaspar K; Zenker G; Joner M; Schömig A; Kastrati A
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2013; 14(2):84-9. PubMed ID: 23352095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Unselected Use of Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Coronary Revascularization.
    Yamaji K; Zanchin T; Zanchin C; Stortecky S; Koskinas KC; Hunziker L; Praz F; Blöchlinger S; Moro C; Moschovitis A; Seiler C; Valgimigli M; Billinger M; Pilgrim T; Heg D; Windecker S; Räber L
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Sep; 11(9):e006741. PubMed ID: 30354590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of an ultrathin-strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent with a durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent for patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: rationale and design of the BIOSTEMI trial.
    Iglesias JF; Muller O; Zaugg S; Roffi M; Kurz DJ; Vuilliomenet A; Weilenmann D; Kaiser C; Tapponnier M; Heg D; Valgimigli M; Eeckhout E; Jüni P; Windecker S; Pilgrim T
    EuroIntervention; 2018 Aug; 14(6):692-699. PubMed ID: 29205157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of long-term in-stent vascular response between abluminal groove-filled biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent and durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent: 3-year OCT follow-up from the TARGET I trial.
    Xu B; Zhang YJ; Sun ZW; Qiao SB; Chen SL; Zhang RY; Pan DR; Pang S; Zhang Q; Xu L; Yang YJ; Leon MB; Gao RL
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Dec; 31(8):1489-96. PubMed ID: 26208685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Neointimal Response between Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent and Bioabsorbable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Severely Calcified Lesions Requiring Rotational Atherectomy.
    Matsuda Y; Ashikaga T; Sasaoka T; Hatano Y; Umemoto T; Lee T; Yonetsu T; Maejima Y; Sasano T
    Int Heart J; 2020 Jul; 61(4):665-672. PubMed ID: 32684594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of neointimal coverage between ultrathin biodegradable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stents and durable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stents: 6 months optical coherence tomography follow-up from the TAXCO study.
    Abhyankar A; Abizaid A; Chamié D; Rathod M
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Feb; 97(3):423-430. PubMed ID: 32243050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.