These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35898642)

  • 21. From Stoop to Squat: A Comprehensive Analysis of Lumbar Loading Among Different Lifting Styles.
    von Arx M; Liechti M; Connolly L; Bangerter C; Meier ML; Schmid S
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2021; 9():769117. PubMed ID: 34805121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Relative performances of artificial neural network and regression mapping tools in evaluation of spinal loads and muscle forces during static lifting.
    Arjmand N; Ekrami O; Shirazi-Adl A; Plamondon A; Parnianpour M
    J Biomech; 2013 May; 46(8):1454-62. PubMed ID: 23541615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Low back load in airport baggage handlers.
    Koblauch H
    Dan Med J; 2016 Apr; 63(4):. PubMed ID: 27034189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Prediction of Cervical Spinal Joint Loading and Secondary Motion Using a Musculoskeletal Multibody Dynamics Model Via Force-Dependent Kinematics Approach.
    Diao H; Xin H; Dong J; He X; Li D; Jin Z
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Dec; 42(24):E1403-E1409. PubMed ID: 28368985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Role of optimization criterion in static asymmetric analysis of lumbar spine load.
    Daniel M
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 2011 Oct; 161(19-20):477-85. PubMed ID: 21792528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Two in vivo surgical approaches for lumbar corpectomy using allograft and a metallic implant: a controlled clinical and biomechanical study.
    Huang P; Gupta MC; Sarigul-Klijn N; Hazelwood S
    Spine J; 2006; 6(6):648-58. PubMed ID: 17088195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An enhanced and validated generic thoraco-lumbar spine model for prediction of muscle forces.
    Han KS; Zander T; Taylor WR; Rohlmann A
    Med Eng Phys; 2012 Jul; 34(6):709-16. PubMed ID: 21978915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. In vivo loads in the lumbar L3-4 disc during a weight lifting extension.
    Wang S; Park WM; Kim YH; Cha T; Wood K; Li G
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2014 Feb; 29(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 24345591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Biomechanical Assessment of the NIOSH Lifting Equation in Asymmetric Load-Handling Activities Using a Detailed Musculoskeletal Model.
    Behjati M; Arjmand N
    Hum Factors; 2019 Mar; 61(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 30222936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Development of a novel in vitro cadaveric model for analysis of biomechanics and surgical treatment of Bertolotti syndrome.
    Golubovsky JL; Colbrunn RW; Klatte RS; Nagle TF; Briskin IN; Chakravarthy VB; Gillespie CM; Reith JD; Jasty N; Benzel EC; Steinmetz MP
    Spine J; 2020 Apr; 20(4):638-656. PubMed ID: 31669612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Predictive equations to estimate spinal loads in symmetric lifting tasks.
    Arjmand N; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C; Parnianpour M
    J Biomech; 2011 Jan; 44(1):84-91. PubMed ID: 20850750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Analysis of squat and stoop dynamic liftings: muscle forces and internal spinal loads.
    Bazrgari B; Shirazi-Adl A; Arjmand N
    Eur Spine J; 2007 May; 16(5):687-99. PubMed ID: 17103232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Direct real-time measurement of in vivo forces in the lumbar spine.
    Ledet EH; Tymeson MP; DiRisio DJ; Cohen B; Uhl RL
    Spine J; 2005; 5(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 15653089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A biomechanical model for estimating loads on thoracic and lumbar vertebrae.
    Iyer S; Christiansen BA; Roberts BJ; Valentine MJ; Manoharan RK; Bouxsein ML
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2010 Nov; 25(9):853-8. PubMed ID: 20655634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Decision making in surgical treatment of chronic low back pain: the performance of prognostic tests to select patients for lumbar spinal fusion.
    Willems P
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2013 Feb; 84(349):1-35. PubMed ID: 23427903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Spinal sagittal alignment goals based on statistical modelling and musculoskeletal simulations.
    Caprara S; Moschini G; Snedeker JG; Farshad M; Senteler M
    J Biomech; 2020 Mar; 102():109621. PubMed ID: 31959392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of lumbo-pelvic rhythm on trunk muscle forces and disc loads during forward flexion: A combined musculoskeletal and finite element simulation study.
    Liu T; Khalaf K; Adeeb S; El-Rich M
    J Biomech; 2019 Jan; 82():116-123. PubMed ID: 30389260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The load on the lumbar spine during asymmetrical bi-manual materials handling.
    Jäger M; Luttmann A
    Ergonomics; 1992; 35(7-8):783-805. PubMed ID: 1633789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Spinal loads as influenced by external loads: a combined in vivo and in silico investigation.
    Zander T; Dreischarf M; Schmidt H; Bergmann G; Rohlmann A
    J Biomech; 2015 Feb; 48(4):578-584. PubMed ID: 25648494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Role of muscle damage on loading at the level adjacent to a lumbar spine fusion: a biomechanical analysis.
    Malakoutian M; Street J; Wilke HJ; Stavness I; Dvorak M; Fels S; Oxland T
    Eur Spine J; 2016 Sep; 25(9):2929-37. PubMed ID: 27465240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.