These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35901630)
41. Fluoroscopy time is not accurate as a surrogate for radiation exposure. Skripochnik E; Loh SA Vascular; 2017 Oct; 25(5):466-471. PubMed ID: 28304221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Factors influencing fluoroscopy time and dose-area product values during ad hoc one-vessel percutaneous coronary angioplasty. Larrazet F; Dibie A; Philippe F; Palau R; Klausz R; Laborde F Br J Radiol; 2003 Jul; 76(907):473-7. PubMed ID: 12857707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Minimizing scattered radiation dose in cardiac catheterization laboratory during interventional procedures using lead free drape - MILD study. Bhat KG; Guleria VS; Singla M; Bohra V; Kumar J R; Bharadwaj P; Datta R; Hasija PK Indian Heart J; 2022; 74(3):201-205. PubMed ID: 35427629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Reduction of radiation exposure during complex interventions for chronic total coronary occlusions: Implementing low dose radiation protocols without affecting procedural success rates. Werner GS; Glaser P; Coenen A; Moehlis H; Tischer KH; Koch M; Klingenbeck R Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 May; 89(6):1005-1012. PubMed ID: 28112448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Impact of New-generation Hybrid Imaging Technology on Radiation Dose during Percutaneous Coronary Interventions and Trans-femoral Aortic Valve Implantations: A comparison with conventional flat-plate angiography. Boland JE; Wang LW; Love BJ; Christofi M; Muller DW Heart Lung Circ; 2016 Jul; 25(7):668-75. PubMed ID: 26906283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Patient exposure to X-rays during coronary angiography and percutaneous transluminal coronary intervention: results of a multicenter national survey. Georges JL; Belle L; Ricard C; Cattan S; Albert F; Hirsch JL; Monsegu J; Dibie A; Khalife K; Caussin C; Maccia C; Livarek B; Hanssen M; Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Apr; 83(5):729-38. PubMed ID: 24323486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. RADIATION DOSE TO PATIENTS IN CORONARY INTERVENTIONAL PROCEDURES: A SURVEY. Brindhaban A Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Jul; 184(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 30289509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Is Dual-Axis Rotational Coronary Angiography Radiation Dose Reduction Achievable in a Population with 100% Suspected Coronary Artery Disease? A Randomized Trial. Szarfer J; Albornoz F; Alonso A; Yurko V; Blanco F; Blanco R; Indavere A; Gigena G; Gagliardi J; Escudero AG J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2020 Jun; 51(2):241-246. PubMed ID: 31980416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The utilisation of the cardiovascular automated radiation reduction X-ray system (CARS) in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory aids in the reduction of the patient radiation dose. Didier R; Magalhaes MA; Koifman E; Leven F; Castellant P; Boschat J; Jobic Y; Kiramijyan S; Nicol PP; Gilard M EuroIntervention; 2016 Oct; 12(8):e948-e956. PubMed ID: 27721211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The role of a commercial radiation dose index monitoring system in establishing local dose reference levels for fluoroscopically guided invasive cardiac procedures. Zucca S; Solla I; Boi A; Loi S; Rossi A; Sanna F; Loi B Phys Med; 2020 Jun; 74():11-18. PubMed ID: 32388465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Physician Radiation Exposure During Endomyocardial Biopsy and Right Heart Catheterization. Loyaga-Rendon RY; Lee S; Dickinson MG; Grayburn R; Gonzalez M; Jani M; Fermin D; Vanoosterhout S; Parker JL; McNamara DA; Madder RD J Card Fail; 2023 Apr; 29(4):473-478. PubMed ID: 36195201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. On-line estimated peak skin dose during percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion using new patient dose mapping technology. Lefèvre T; Mangiameli A; Hovasse T; Louvard Y; Benamer H; Garot P; Unterseeh T; Champagne S; Tavolaro O; Amelot S; Chevalier B Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2022; 115(8-9):436-447. PubMed ID: 35840491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Relationship between fluoroscopic time, dose-area product, body weight, and maximum radiation skin dose in cardiac interventional procedures. Chida K; Saito H; Otani H; Kohzuki M; Takahashi S; Yamada S; Shirato K; Zuguchi M AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Mar; 186(3):774-8. PubMed ID: 16498105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Image noise reduction technology allows significant reduction of radiation dosage in cardiac device implantation procedures. Hoffmann R; Langenbrink L; Reimann D; Kastrati M; Becker M; Piatkowski M; Michaelsen J Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2017 Dec; 40(12):1374-1379. PubMed ID: 29052249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Patient exposure data and operator dose in coronary interventional procedures: Impact of body-mass index and procedure complexity. Zanca F; Collard C; Alexandre N; Deprez F; Salembier JP; Henry M; Rombaut E; Massart PE Phys Med; 2020 Aug; 76():38-43. PubMed ID: 32593137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION OF RADIATION DOSE TO PATIENTS FROM CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONAL PROCEDURES IN TANZANIA. Ngaile JE; Msaki PK; Mvungi R; Schreiner LJ Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Nov; 181(4):317-332. PubMed ID: 29474654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]