209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35901901)
1. Key factors to consider in the use of environmental DNA metabarcoding to monitor terrestrial ecological restoration.
van der Heyde M; Bunce M; Nevill P
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Nov; 848():157617. PubMed ID: 35901901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Applications of environmental DNA (eDNA) in agricultural systems: Current uses, limitations and future prospects.
Kestel JH; Field DL; Bateman PW; White NE; Allentoft ME; Hopkins AJM; Gibberd M; Nevill P
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Nov; 847():157556. PubMed ID: 35882340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Environmental DNA metabarcoding for benthic monitoring: A review of sediment sampling and DNA extraction methods.
Pawlowski J; Bruce K; Panksep K; Aguirre FI; Amalfitano S; Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil L; Baussant T; Bouchez A; Carugati L; Cermakova K; Cordier T; Corinaldesi C; Costa FO; Danovaro R; Dell'Anno A; Duarte S; Eisendle U; Ferrari BJD; Frontalini F; Frühe L; Haegerbaeumer A; Kisand V; Krolicka A; Lanzén A; Leese F; Lejzerowicz F; Lyautey E; Maček I; Sagova-Marečková M; Pearman JK; Pochon X; Stoeck T; Vivien R; Weigand A; Fazi S
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Apr; 818():151783. PubMed ID: 34801504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Urban landscape-level biodiversity assessments of aquatic and terrestrial vertebrates by environmental DNA metabarcoding.
Zhang S; Zhao J; Yao M
J Environ Manage; 2023 Aug; 340():117971. PubMed ID: 37119629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Revegetation rewilds the soil bacterial microbiome of an old field.
Gellie NJC; Mills JG; Breed MF; Lowe AJ
Mol Ecol; 2017 Jun; 26(11):2895-2904. PubMed ID: 28261928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Changes in soil microbial communities in post mine ecological restoration: Implications for monitoring using high throughput DNA sequencing.
van der Heyde M; Bunce M; Dixon K; Wardell-Johnson G; White NE; Nevill P
Sci Total Environ; 2020 Dec; 749():142262. PubMed ID: 33370926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sampling environmental DNA from trees and soil to detect cryptic arboreal mammals.
Allen MC; Kwait R; Vastano A; Kisurin A; Zoccolo I; Jaffe BD; Angle JC; Maslo B; Lockwood JL
Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):180. PubMed ID: 36604526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A manager's guide to using eDNA metabarcoding in marine ecosystems.
Gold Z; Wall AR; Schweizer TM; Pentcheff ND; Curd EE; Barber PH; Meyer RS; Wayne R; Stolzenbach K; Prickett K; Luedy J; Wetzer R
PeerJ; 2022; 10():e14071. PubMed ID: 36405018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. eDNA metabarcoding of avocado flowers: 'Hass' it got potential to survey arthropods in food production systems?
Kestel JH; Bateman PW; Field DL; White NE; Lines R; Nevill P
Mol Ecol Resour; 2023 Oct; 23(7):1540-1555. PubMed ID: 37237427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modeling the ecological status response of rivers to multiple stressors using machine learning: A comparison of environmental DNA metabarcoding and morphological data.
Fan J; Wang S; Li H; Yan Z; Zhang Y; Zheng X; Wang P
Water Res; 2020 Sep; 183():116004. PubMed ID: 32622231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Airborne environmental DNA captures terrestrial vertebrate diversity in nature.
Lynggaard C; Frøslev TG; Johnson MS; Olsen MT; Bohmann K
Mol Ecol Resour; 2024 Jan; 24(1):e13840. PubMed ID: 37497670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Environmental DNA of insects and springtails from caves reveals complex processes of eDNA transfer in soils.
Lunghi E; Valle B; Guerrieri A; Bonin A; Cianferoni F; Manenti R; Ficetola GF
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jun; 826():154022. PubMed ID: 35202680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. eDNA in subterranean ecosystems: Applications, technical aspects, and future prospects.
Saccò M; Guzik MT; van der Heyde M; Nevill P; Cooper SJB; Austin AD; Coates PJ; Allentoft ME; White NE
Sci Total Environ; 2022 May; 820():153223. PubMed ID: 35063529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Environmental DNA Metabarcoding: A Novel Method for Biodiversity Monitoring of Marine Fish Communities.
Miya M
Ann Rev Mar Sci; 2022 Jan; 14():161-185. PubMed ID: 34351788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. eDNA metabarcoding as a promising conservation tool for monitoring fish diversity in a coastal wetland of the Pearl River Estuary compared to bottom trawling.
Zou K; Chen J; Ruan H; Li Z; Guo W; Li M; Liu L
Sci Total Environ; 2020 Feb; 702():134704. PubMed ID: 31726353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating biodiversity for coral reef reformation and monitoring on complex 3D structures using environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding.
Levy N; Simon-Blecher N; Ben-Ezra S; Yuval M; Doniger T; Leray M; Karako-Lampert S; Tarazi E; Levy O
Sci Total Environ; 2023 Jan; 856(Pt 2):159051. PubMed ID: 36181819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of seasonal dynamics of fungal DNA assemblages in a flow-regulated stream in a restored forest using eDNA metabarcoding.
Matsuoka S; Sugiyama Y; Shimono Y; Ushio M; Doi H
Environ Microbiol; 2021 Aug; 23(8):4797-4806. PubMed ID: 34258854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Supervised machine learning improves general applicability of eDNA metabarcoding for reservoir health monitoring.
Hu H; Wei XY; Liu L; Wang YB; Jia HJ; Bu LK; Pei DS
Water Res; 2023 Nov; 246():120686. PubMed ID: 37812979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Airborne environmental DNA for terrestrial vertebrate community monitoring.
Lynggaard C; Bertelsen MF; Jensen CV; Johnson MS; Frøslev TG; Olsen MT; Bohmann K
Curr Biol; 2022 Feb; 32(3):701-707.e5. PubMed ID: 34995490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Environmental DNA metabarcoding studies are critically affected by substrate selection.
Koziol A; Stat M; Simpson T; Jarman S; DiBattista JD; Harvey ES; Marnane M; McDonald J; Bunce M
Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Mar; 19(2):366-376. PubMed ID: 30485662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
