These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35902300)

  • 21. Distribution of prostate cancer recurrences on gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen (
    Huits TH; Luiting HB; van der Poel HG; Nandurkar R; Donswijk M; Schaake E; Vogel W; Roobol MJ; Wit E; Stricker P; Emmett L; van Leeuwen PJ
    BJU Int; 2020 Jun; 125(6):876-883. PubMed ID: 32181951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. 68Ga-Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography-Based Primary Staging and Histological Correlation after Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer.
    Kopp D; Kopp J; Bernhardt E; Manka L; Beck A; Gerullis H; Karakiewicz PI; Salomon G; Wiggermann P; Hammerer P; Schiffmann J
    Urol Int; 2022; 106(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 33965965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. In primary lymph nodal staging of patients with high-risk and intermediate-risk prostate cancer, how critical is the role of Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography?
    Kulkarni SC; Sundaram PS; Padma S
    Nucl Med Commun; 2020 Feb; 41(2):139-146. PubMed ID: 31714366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Lymph node staging with fluorine-18 prostate specific membrane antigen 1007-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in newly diagnosed intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer using histopathological evaluation of extended pelvic node dissection as reference.
    Hermsen R; Wedick EBC; Vinken MJM; van Kalmthout LWM; Küsters-Vandevelde HVN; Wijers CHW; Somford DM; van Basten JA
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2022 Sep; 49(11):3929-3937. PubMed ID: 35543733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Establishment and prospective validation of an SUV
    Jiao J; Kang F; Zhang J; Quan Z; Wen W; Zhao X; Ma S; Wu P; Yang F; Guo W; Yang X; Yuan J; Shi Y; Wang J; Qin W
    Theranostics; 2021; 11(17):8396-8411. PubMed ID: 34373749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Diagnostic accuracy of
    Scheltema MJ; Chang JI; Stricker PD; van Leeuwen PJ; Nguyen QA; Ho B; Delprado W; Lee J; Thompson JE; Cusick T; Spriensma AS; Siriwardana AR; Yuen C; Kooner R; Hruby G; O'Neill G; Emmett L
    BJU Int; 2019 Nov; 124 Suppl 1():42-49. PubMed ID: 31287613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Clinical utility of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in initial staging of patients with prostate cancer and importance of intraprostatic SUVmax values.
    Rogic I; Golubic AT; Zuvic M; Smitran T; Jukic N; Gamulin M; Kastelan Z; Huic D
    Nucl Med Rev Cent East Eur; 2024; 27(0):6-12. PubMed ID: 38680016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET/CT Combined with Sentinel Node Biopsy for Primary Lymph Node Staging in Prostate Cancer.
    Hinsenveld FJ; Wit EMK; van Leeuwen PJ; Brouwer OR; Donswijk ML; Tillier CN; Vegt E; van Muilekom E; van Oosterom MN; van Leeuwen FWB; van der Poel HG
    J Nucl Med; 2020 Apr; 61(4):540-545. PubMed ID: 31562222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29.
    von Eyben FE; Picchio M; von Eyben R; Rhee H; Bauman G
    Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Sep; 4(5):686-693. PubMed ID: 28753806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. High negative predictive value of 68Ga PSMA PET-CT for local lymph node metastases in high risk primary prostate cancer with histopathological correlation.
    Rahman LA; Rutagengwa D; Lin P; Lin M; Yap J; Lai K; Mancuso P; Rathore P; Haghighi K; Gassner P; Wong LH; Lalak N
    Cancer Imaging; 2019 Dec; 19(1):86. PubMed ID: 31829288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of
    Schollhammer R; Robert G; Asselineau J; Yacoub M; Vimont D; Balamoutoff N; Bladou F; Bénard A; Hindié E; Gallerande HC; Morgat C
    J Nucl Med; 2023 Mar; 64(3):379-385. PubMed ID: 36215569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Impact of uptake time on image quality of [
    van der Sar ECA; Viol SLM; Braat AJAT; van Rooij R; Lam MGEH; de Jong HWAM; de Keizer B
    Med Phys; 2023 Dec; 50(12):7619-7628. PubMed ID: 37093883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Potential Impact of
    Calais J; Kishan AU; Cao M; Fendler WP; Eiber M; Herrmann K; Ceci F; Reiter RE; Rettig MB; Hegde JV; Shaverdian N; King CR; Steinberg ML; Czernin J; Nickols NG
    J Nucl Med; 2018 Nov; 59(11):1714-1721. PubMed ID: 29653978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of preoperative locoregional Ga-68 PSMA-11 PET-CT and mp-MRI results with postoperative histopathology of prostate cancer.
    Yilmaz B; Turkay R; Colakoglu Y; Baytekin HF; Ergul N; Sahin S; Tugcu V; Inci E; Tasci AI; Cermik TF
    Prostate; 2019 Jun; 79(9):1007-1017. PubMed ID: 31012125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Initial Experience of (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT Imaging in High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Prior to Radical Prostatectomy.
    Budäus L; Leyh-Bannurah SR; Salomon G; Michl U; Heinzer H; Huland H; Graefen M; Steuber T; Rosenbaum C
    Eur Urol; 2016 Mar; 69(3):393-6. PubMed ID: 26116958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Robot-Assisted Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Radioguided Surgery in Primary Diagnosed Prostate Cancer.
    Gondoputro W; Scheltema MJ; Blazevski A; Doan P; Thompson JE; Amin A; Geboers B; Agrawal S; Siriwardana A; Van Leeuwen PJ; van Oosterom MN; Van Leeuwen FWB; Emmett L; Stricker PD
    J Nucl Med; 2022 Nov; 63(11):1659-1664. PubMed ID: 35241483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Correlations of the
    Karyagar SS; Karyagar S; Guven O
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2020; 23(2):120-124. PubMed ID: 32716402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38.
    Cytawa W; Seitz AK; Kircher S; Fukushima K; Tran-Gia J; Schirbel A; Bandurski T; Lass P; Krebs M; Połom W; Matuszewski M; Wester HJ; Buck AK; Kübler H; Lapa C
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2020 Jan; 47(1):168-177. PubMed ID: 31529265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Clinical parameters and nomograms for predicting lymph node metastasis detected with
    Onal C; Ozyigit G; Oymak E; Guler OC; Hurmuz P; Tilki B; Reyhan M; Tuncel M; Akyol F
    Prostate; 2021 Jul; 81(10):648-656. PubMed ID: 33949694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Accuracy of standard clinical 3T prostate MRI for pelvic lymph node staging: Comparison to
    Meißner S; Janssen JC; Prasad V; Diederichs G; Hamm B; Brenner W; Makowski MR
    Sci Rep; 2019 Jul; 9(1):10727. PubMed ID: 31341209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.