These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35902451)

  • 1. Are auditory cues special? Evidence from cross-modal distractor-induced blindness.
    Kern L; Niedeggen M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):889-904. PubMed ID: 35902451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ERP signatures of auditory awareness in cross-modal distractor-induced deafness.
    Kern L; Niedeggen M
    Conscious Cogn; 2021 Nov; 96():103241. PubMed ID: 34823076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Distractor-induced deafness: The effect of multiple auditory distractors on conscious target processing.
    Kern L; Niedeggen M
    Cortex; 2021 Jan; 134():181-194. PubMed ID: 33279811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cross-modal perceptual load: the impact of modality and individual differences.
    Sandhu R; Dyson BJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 May; 234(5):1279-91. PubMed ID: 26670905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An event-related FMRI study of exogenous orienting across vision and audition.
    Yang Z; Mayer AR
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2014 Mar; 35(3):964-74. PubMed ID: 23288620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mutual influences of intermodal visual/tactile apparent motion and auditory motion with uncrossed and crossed arms.
    Jiang Y; Chen L
    Multisens Res; 2013; 26(1-2):19-51. PubMed ID: 23713198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Error Rates in the Distractor-Induced Deafness Paradigm.
    Michael L; Böke A; Ipczynski H
    Brain Sci; 2022 Jun; 12(6):. PubMed ID: 35741623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cross-modal interactions between audition, touch, and vision in endogenous spatial attention: ERP evidence on preparatory states and sensory modulations.
    Eimer M; van Velzen J; Driver J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Feb; 14(2):254-71. PubMed ID: 11970790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of visual cross-modal conflict with semantic and nonsemantic distractors on working memory task: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy study.
    Sawamura D; Tanabe Y; Sakuraba S; Cui J; Miura H; Saito R; Sugi M; Watanabe A; Tokikuni Y; Sugawara K; Miyazaki M; Miyamoto R; Sakai S
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Sep; 101(36):e30330. PubMed ID: 36086757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adaptability and specificity of inhibition processes in distractor-induced blindness.
    Winther GN; Niedeggen M
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Dec; 54(12):1882-1898. PubMed ID: 28892157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cross-modal cueing in audiovisual spatial attention.
    Blurton SP; Greenlee MW; Gondan M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Oct; 77(7):2356-76. PubMed ID: 26001381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditory and visual distractors disrupt multisensory temporal acuity in the crossmodal temporal order judgment task.
    Dean CL; Eggleston BA; Gibney KD; Aligbe E; Blackwell M; Kwakye LD
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0179564. PubMed ID: 28723907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neural practice effect during cross-modal selective attention: Supra-modal and modality-specific effects.
    Xia J; Zhang W; Jiang Y; Li Y; Chen Q
    Cortex; 2018 Sep; 106():47-64. PubMed ID: 29864595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sound-aided recovery from and persistence against visual filling-in.
    Sheth BR; Shimojo S
    Vision Res; 2004; 44(16):1907-17. PubMed ID: 15145684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Region-specific modulations in oscillatory alpha activity serve to facilitate processing in the visual and auditory modalities.
    Mazaheri A; van Schouwenburg MR; Dimitrijevic A; Denys D; Cools R; Jensen O
    Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 87():356-62. PubMed ID: 24188814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Increased visual task difficulty enhances attentional capture by both visual and auditory distractor stimuli.
    Sugimoto F; Katayama J
    Brain Res; 2017 Jun; 1664():55-62. PubMed ID: 28377160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cross-modal prediction changes the timing of conscious access during the motion-induced blindness.
    Chang AY; Kanai R; Seth AK
    Conscious Cogn; 2015 Jan; 31():139-47. PubMed ID: 25486340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of same- and different-modality spatial cues on auditory and visual target identification.
    Mondor TA; Amirault KJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Jun; 24(3):745-55. PubMed ID: 9627413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Overt spatial attention modulates multisensory selection.
    Jensen A; Merz S; Spence C; Frings C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Feb; 45(2):174-188. PubMed ID: 30589358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cross-modal links among vision, audition, and touch in complex environments.
    Ferris TK; Sarter NB
    Hum Factors; 2008 Feb; 50(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 18354968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.