These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35903079)

  • 21. Comparison of the bone anchored hearing aid implantable hearing device with contralateral routing of offside signal amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness.
    Niparko JK; Cox KM; Lustig LR
    Otol Neurotol; 2003 Jan; 24(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 12544032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Fitting Frequency-Lowering Signal Processing Applying the American Academy of Audiology Pediatric Amplification Guideline: Updates and Protocols.
    Scollie S; Glista D; Seto J; Dunn A; Schuett B; Hawkins M; Pourmand N; Parsa V
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Mar; 27(3):219-236. PubMed ID: 26967363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting: III. A general method for deriving initial fittings for hearing aids with multi-channel compression.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Stone MA
    Br J Audiol; 1999 Aug; 33(4):241-58. PubMed ID: 10509859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Fitting Noise Management Signal Processing Applying the American Academy of Audiology Pediatric Amplification Guideline: Verification Protocols.
    Scollie S; Levy C; Pourmand N; Abbasalipour P; Bagatto M; Richert F; Moodie S; Crukley J; Parsa V
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Mar; 27(3):237-251. PubMed ID: 26967364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Quantifying the Range of Signal Modification in Clinically Fit Hearing Aids.
    Rallapalli V; Anderson M; Kates J; Balmert L; Sirow L; Arehart K; Souza P
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(2):433-441. PubMed ID: 31408045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An Argument for Self-Report as a Reference Standard in Audiology.
    Vermiglio AJ; Soli SD; Fang X
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Mar; 29(3):206-222. PubMed ID: 29488871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting: II. Hearing aids with multi-channel compression.
    Moore BC; Alcántara JI; Stone MA; Glasberg BR
    Br J Audiol; 1999 Jun; 33(3):157-70. PubMed ID: 10439142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of three procedures for initial fitting of compression hearing aids. I. Experienced users, fitted bilaterally.
    Moore BC; Alcántara JI; Marriage J
    Br J Audiol; 2001 Dec; 35(6):339-53. PubMed ID: 11848176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Audiological and clinical outcomes of a transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant: Six-month results from a multicentre study.
    den Besten CA; Monksfield P; Bosman A; Skarzynski PH; Green K; Runge C; Wigren S; Blechert JI; Flynn MC; Mylanus EAM; Hol MKS
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2019 Mar; 44(2):144-157. PubMed ID: 30358920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Clinical guide for audiologic tinnitus management I: Assessment.
    Henry JA; Zaugg TL; Schechter MA
    Am J Audiol; 2005 Jun; 14(1):21-48. PubMed ID: 16180968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The speech perception gap in cochlear implant patients.
    Franks ZG; Jacob A
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 Jul; 20(4):176-181. PubMed ID: 30806176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Applying the Hearing Aid Fitting Standard to Selection for Adults.
    Picou EM; Roberts RA; Angley G; Ricketts TA
    Semin Hear; 2022 May; 43(2):66-78. PubMed ID: 35903077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Loudness scaling. A procedure for quantitative recruitment detection].
    Kiessling J; Schubert M; Wagner I
    HNO; 1994 Jun; 42(6):350-7. PubMed ID: 8071095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Probe microphone measurements: 20 years of progress.
    Mueller HG
    Trends Amplif; 2001 Jun; 5(2):35-68. PubMed ID: 25425897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Preimplant Hearing Aid Fittings and Aided Audibility for Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Nickerson A; Davidson LS; Uchanski RM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Sep; 30(8):703-711. PubMed ID: 31044697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Categorical loudness scaling within the scope of hearing aid management].
    von Wedel H; Meister H; Walger M
    HNO; 2000 Mar; 48(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 10768109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparison of two word-recognition tasks in multitalker babble: Speech Recognition in Noise Test (SPRINT) and Words-in-Noise Test (WIN).
    Wilson RH; Cates WB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008; 19(7):548-56. PubMed ID: 19248731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The Effects of Nonlinear Frequency Compression and Digital Noise Reduction on Word Recognition and Satisfaction Ratings in Noise in Adult Hearing Aid Users.
    Plyler PN; Tardy B; Hedrick M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Feb; 30(2):103-114. PubMed ID: 30461384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of hearing aid frequency response fittings in pediatric and young adult bimodal recipients.
    Davidson LS; Firszt JB; Brenner C; Cadieux JH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Apr; 26(4):393-407. PubMed ID: 25879243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Adaptive fitting of hearing instruments by category loudness scaling (ScalAdapt).
    Kiessling J; Schubert M; Archut A
    Scand Audiol; 1996; 25(3):153-60. PubMed ID: 8881002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.