These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3590363)

  • 1. Orientation and frequency dependence of backscatter coefficient in normal and pathological breast tissues.
    Landini L; Sarnelli R; Salvadori M; Squartini F
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1987 Feb; 13(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 3590363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Angle dependence of ultrasonic backscatter in arterial tissues: a study in vitro.
    Picano E; Landini L; Distante A; Salvadori M; Lattanzi F; Masini M; L'Abbate A
    Circulation; 1985 Sep; 72(3):572-6. PubMed ID: 4017209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Frequency dependence of ultrasound attenuation and backscatter in breast tissue.
    D'Astous FT; Foster FS
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1986 Oct; 12(10):795-808. PubMed ID: 3541334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Frequency dependence of ultrasonic backscattering in cancellous bone: autocorrelation model and experimental results.
    Chaffaï S; Roberjot V; Peyrin F; Berger G; Laugier P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Nov; 108(5 Pt 1):2403-11. PubMed ID: 11108380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Structural remodeling of human myocardial tissue after infarction. Quantification with ultrasonic backscatter.
    Wickline SA; Verdonk ED; Wong AK; Shepard RK; Miller JG
    Circulation; 1992 Jan; 85(1):259-68. PubMed ID: 1728457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of frequency dependence of backscatter coefficient in normal and atherosclerotic aortic walls.
    Landini L; Sarnelli R; Picano E; Salvadori M
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1986 May; 12(5):397-401. PubMed ID: 3521030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interlaboratory comparison of ultrasonic backscatter coefficient measurements from 2 to 9 MHz.
    Wear KA; Stiles TA; Frank GR; Madsen EL; Cheng F; Feleppa EJ; Hall CS; Kim BS; Lee P; O'Brien WD; Oelze ML; Raju BI; Shung KK; Wilson TA; Yuan JR
    J Ultrasound Med; 2005 Sep; 24(9):1235-50. PubMed ID: 16123184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A proposed microscopic elastic wave theory for ultrasonic backscatter from myocardial tissue.
    Rose JH; Kaufmann MR; Wickline SA; Hall CS; Miller JG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Jan; 97(1):656-68. PubMed ID: 7860840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Anisotropy of the apparent frequency dependence of backscatter in formalin fixed human myocardium.
    Hall CS; Verdonk ED; Wickline SA; Perez JE; Miller JG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Jan; 101(1):563-8. PubMed ID: 9000744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identification of human myocardial infarction in vitro based on the frequency dependence of ultrasonic backscatter.
    Wickline SA; Verdonk ED; Sobel BE; Miller JG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 May; 91(5):3018-25. PubMed ID: 1629493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Frequency dependence of apparent ultrasonic backscatter from human cancellous bone.
    Hoffmeister BK
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Feb; 56(3):667-83. PubMed ID: 21220842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Anisotropy of the ultrasonic backscatter of myocardial tissue: II. Measurements in vivo.
    Madaras EI; Perez J; Sobel BE; Mottley JG; Miller JG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Feb; 83(2):762-9. PubMed ID: 3351134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Anisotropy of ultrasonic propagation and scattering properties in fresh rat skeletal muscle in vitro.
    Topp KA; O'Brien WD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Feb; 107(2):1027-33. PubMed ID: 10687711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acoustic Properties of Breast Fat.
    Nasief HG; Rosado-Mendez IM; Zagzebski JA; Hall TJ
    J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Nov; 34(11):2007-16. PubMed ID: 26446820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Frequency-dependent attenuation and backscatter coefficients in bovine trabecular bone from 0.2 to 1.2 MHz.
    Il Lee K; Joo Choi M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):EL67-73. PubMed ID: 22280732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Backscatter directivity and integrated backscatter power of arterial tissue.
    de Kroon MG; van der Wal LF; Gussenhoven WJ; Rijsterborgh H; Bom N
    Int J Card Imaging; 1991; 6(3-4):265-75. PubMed ID: 1919069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characterization of anisotropic myocardial backscatter using spectral slope, intercept and midband fit parameters.
    Yang M; Krueger TM; Miller JG; Holland MR
    Ultrason Imaging; 2007 Apr; 29(2):122-34. PubMed ID: 17679326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Angle-dependent backscatter from the arterial wall.
    de Kroon MG; van der Wal LF; Gussenhoven WJ; Bom N
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1991; 17(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 2053208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Backscatter dose from metallic materials due to obliquely incident high-energy photon beams.
    Nadrowitz R; Feyerabend T
    Med Phys; 2001 Jun; 28(6):959-65. PubMed ID: 11439492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Anisotropy of the ultrasonic backscatter of myocardial tissue: I. Theory and measurements in vitro.
    Mottley JG; Miller JG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Feb; 83(2):755-61. PubMed ID: 3351133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.