BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35904229)

  • 21. Comparison of two different surgical approaches to increase peri-implant mucosal thickness: A randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Hutton CG; Johnson GK; Barwacz CA; Allareddy V; Avila-Ortiz G
    J Periodontol; 2018 Jul; 89(7):807-814. PubMed ID: 29633268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of implant placement timing and type of soft-tissue grafting on histological and histomorphometric outcomes in a preclinical canine model.
    Lim HC; Lee KS; Shin SY; Jung RE; Jung UW; Thoma DS
    J Clin Periodontol; 2024 Jul; 51(7):840-851. PubMed ID: 38483022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Randomized controlled pilot study comparing small buccal defects around dental implants treated with a subepithelial connective tissue graft or with guided bone regeneration.
    Zuercher AN; Strauss FJ; Paqué PN; Bienz SP; Jung RE; Thoma DS
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Oct; 34(10):1094-1105. PubMed ID: 37483129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Peri-implant soft tissue phenotype modification and its impact on peri-implant health: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Tavelli L; Barootchi S; Avila-Ortiz G; Urban IA; Giannobile WV; Wang HL
    J Periodontol; 2021 Jan; 92(1):21-44. PubMed ID: 32710810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clinical efficacy of soft-tissue augmentation on tissue preservation at immediate implant sites: A randomized controlled trial.
    Lee CT; Tran D; Tsukiboshi Y; Min S; Kim SK; Ayilavarapu S; Weltman R
    J Clin Periodontol; 2023 Jul; 50(7):1010-1020. PubMed ID: 37052357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Do soft tissue augmentation techniques provide stable and favorable peri-implant conditions in the medium and long term? A systematic review.
    Stefanini M; Barootchi S; Sangiorgi M; Pispero A; Grusovin MG; Mancini L; Zucchelli G; Tavelli L
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Sep; 34 Suppl 26():28-42. PubMed ID: 37750532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Xenogeneic collagen matrix versus connective tissue graft for soft tissue augmentation at immediately placed implants: a prospective clinical trial.
    De Angelis P; Rella E; Manicone PF; Liguori MG; De Rosa G; Cavalcanti C; Galeazzi N; D'Addona A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Oct; 52(10):1097-1105. PubMed ID: 36801183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Post-extraction volumetric analysis of alveolar ridge contour using subepithelial connective tissue graft in esthetic zone: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Gamal N; Shemais N; Al-Nawawy M; Ghallab NA
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Nov; 27(11):6503-6512. PubMed ID: 37726486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Soft tissue volume gain around dental implants using autogenous subepithelial connective tissue grafts harvested from the lateral palate or tuberosity area. A randomized controlled clinical study.
    Rojo E; Stroppa G; Sanz-Martin I; Gonzalez-Martín O; Alemany AS; Nart J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2018 Apr; 45(4):495-503. PubMed ID: 29334403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Guided bone regeneration and abutment connection augment the buccal soft tissue contour: 3-year results of a prospective comparative clinical study.
    Benic GI; Ge Y; Gallucci GO; Jung RE; Schneider D; Hämmerle CH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Feb; 28(2):219-225. PubMed ID: 26856399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparative analysis of xenogeneic collagen matrix and autogenous subepithelial connective tissue graft to increase soft tissue volume around dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ashurko I; Tarasenko S; Magdalyanova M; Bokareva S; Balyasin M; Galyas A; Khamidova M; Zhornik M; Unkovskiy A
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Oct; 23(1):741. PubMed ID: 37817128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Contour Changes Following Implant Placement and Concomitant Soft Tissue Augmentation Applying a Volume-Stable Collagen Matrix.
    Artzi Z; Renert U; Pirc M; Netanely E; Thoma DS
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2022; 42(4):515-522. PubMed ID: 35830317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Efficacy of Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix to Augment Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Thickness Compared to Autogenous Connective Tissue Graft: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Gargallo-Albiol J; Barootchi S; Tavelli L; Wang HL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(5):1059–1069. PubMed ID: 31184638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evidence-based knowledge on the aesthetics and maintenance of peri-implant soft tissues: Osteology Foundation Consensus Report Part 1-Effects of soft tissue augmentation procedures on the maintenance of peri-implant soft tissue health.
    Giannobile WV; Jung RE; Schwarz F;
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Mar; 29 Suppl 15():7-10. PubMed ID: 29498127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: management of soft tissues for dental implants.
    Esposito M; Maghaireh H; Grusovin MG; Ziounas I; Worthington HV
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Feb; 2012(2):CD006697. PubMed ID: 22336822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Implants sites with concomitant bone regeneration using a resorbable or non-resorbable membrane result in stable marginal bone levels and similar profilometric outcomes over 5 years.
    Naenni N; Stucki L; Hüsler J; Schneider D; Hämmerle CHF; Jung RE; Thoma DS
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Aug; 32(8):893-904. PubMed ID: 33977571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Soft tissue management for dental implants: what are the most effective techniques? A Cochrane systematic review.
    Esposito M; Maghaireh H; Grusovin MG; Ziounas I; Worthington HV
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2012; 5(3):221-38. PubMed ID: 23000707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical comparison of a xenogeneic collagen matrix versus subepithelial autogenous connective tissue graft for augmentation of soft tissue around implants.
    De Angelis P; De Angelis S; Passarelli PC; Liguori MG; Pompa G; Papi P; Manicone PF; D'Addona A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Jul; 50(7):956-963. PubMed ID: 33279377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Volumetric changes and peri-implant health at implant sites with or without soft tissue grafting in the esthetic zone, a retrospective case-control study with a 5-year follow-up.
    Bienz SP; Jung RE; Sapata VM; Hämmerle CHF; Hüsler J; Thoma DS
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Nov; 28(11):1459-1465. PubMed ID: 28370489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Augmentation of soft tissue volume at pontic sites: a comparison between a cross-linked and a non-cross-linked collagen matrix.
    Naenni N; Walter P; Hämmerle CHF; Jung RE; Thoma DS
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Mar; 25(3):1535-1545. PubMed ID: 32719982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.