BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35905116)

  • 1. The evolution and co-evolution of a primary care cancer research network: From academic social connection to research collaboration.
    Vermond D; de Groot E; Sills VA; Lyratzopoulos G; Walter FM; de Wit NJ; Rubin G
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(7):e0272255. PubMed ID: 35905116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evolution of Cooperation Patterns in Psoriasis Research: Co-Authorship Network Analysis of Papers in Medline (1942-2013).
    González-Alcaide G; Park J; Huamaní C; Belinchón I; Ramos JM
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0144837. PubMed ID: 26658481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The scientific productions in Iranian biomedical ethics: A combined study of bibliometrics and social network analysis.
    Mardani A; Parsapoor A; Asghari F; Shamsi Gooshki E
    Dev World Bioeth; 2022 Sep; 22(3):126-139. PubMed ID: 33438806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Collaborative patterns, authorship practices and scientific success in biomedical research: a network analysis.
    Patel VM; Panzarasa P; Ashrafian H; Evans TS; Kirresh A; Sevdalis N; Darzi A; Athanasiou T
    J R Soc Med; 2019 Jun; 112(6):245-257. PubMed ID: 31163118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Co-authorship network analysis in health research: method and potential use.
    Fonseca Bde P; Sampaio RB; Fonseca MV; Zicker F
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2016 Apr; 14(1):34. PubMed ID: 27138279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing Research Collaboration through Co-authorship Network Analysis.
    Fagan J; Eddens KS; Dolly J; Vanderford NL; Weiss H; Levens JS
    J Res Adm; 2018; 49(1):76-99. PubMed ID: 31435193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can co-authorship networks be used to predict author research impact? A machine-learning based analysis within the field of degenerative cervical myelopathy research.
    Grodzinski N; Grodzinski B; Davies BM
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(9):e0256997. PubMed ID: 34473796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using Co-authorship Networks to Map and Analyse Global Neglected Tropical Disease Research with an Affiliation to Germany.
    Bender ME; Edwards S; von Philipsborn P; Steinbeis F; Keil T; Tinnemann P
    PLoS Negl Trop Dis; 2015 Dec; 9(12):e0004182. PubMed ID: 26719978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factors determining development of researchers within a research network on cancer diagnosis in primary care (CanTest): an interview study.
    de Groot E; Vermond D; Sills VA; Mol SSL; Walter FM; Rubin G; de Wit NJ
    BMJ Open; 2022 Mar; 12(3):e046321. PubMed ID: 35273039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of seniority, gender and geography on the bibliometric output and collaboration networks of European Research Council (ERC) grant recipients.
    Pina DG; Barać L; Buljan I; Grimaldo F; Marušić A
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0212286. PubMed ID: 30763395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Collaboration enhances career progression in academic science, especially for female researchers.
    van der Wal JEM; Thorogood R; Horrocks NPC
    Proc Biol Sci; 2021 Sep; 288(1958):20210219. PubMed ID: 34493075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stakeholder theory and management: Understanding longitudinal collaboration networks.
    Fares J; Chung KSK; Abbasi A
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0255658. PubMed ID: 34648505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Co-authorship and collaboration networks in Spanish research into multiple sclerosis (1996-2010)].
    Aleixandre-Benavent R; Alonso-Arroyo A; Gonzalez de Dios J; Sempere AP; Castello-Cogollos L; Bolanos-Pizarro M; Valderrama-Zurian JC
    Rev Neurol; 2013 Aug; 57(4):157-66. PubMed ID: 23884870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patterns of collaboration and knowledge generated by an Australian rural research centre over 20 years: a co-authorship network analysis.
    Bailie J; Matous P; Bailie R; Passey ME
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2023 Aug; 21(1):87. PubMed ID: 37649071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scientific collaboration in Zika: identification of the leading research groups and researchers via social network analysis.
    Maia LFMP; Lenzi M; Rabello ET; Oliveira J
    Cad Saude Publica; 2019 Apr; 35(3):e00220217. PubMed ID: 30994704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Social Network: a Cytoscape app for visualizing co-authorship networks.
    Kofia V; Isserlin R; Buchan AM; Bader GD
    F1000Res; 2015; 4():481. PubMed ID: 26949516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dengue research networks: building evidence for policy and planning in Brazil.
    de Paula Fonseca E Fonseca B; Zicker F
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2016 Nov; 14(1):80. PubMed ID: 27825383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Network analysis for science and technology management: Evidence from tuberculosis research in Fiocruz, Brazil.
    Fonseca BPFE; Silva MVPD; Araújo KM; Sampaio RB; Moraes MO
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0181870. PubMed ID: 28792514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evolution of coauthorship networks: worldwide scientific production on leishmaniasis.
    González-Alcaide G; Huamaní C; Park J; Ramos JM
    Rev Soc Bras Med Trop; 2013; 46(6):719-27. PubMed ID: 24474013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visualization of clinical teaching citations using social network analysis.
    Hazrati H; Bigdeli S; Arabshahi SKS; Gavgani VZ; Vahed N
    BMC Med Educ; 2021 Jun; 21(1):349. PubMed ID: 34134681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.