These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35906131)

  • 1. Exploring informed choice in preconception reproductive genetic carrier screening by using a modified Multidimensional Measure of Informed Choice.
    Van Steijvoort E; Peeters H; Vandecruys H; Verguts J; Peeraer K; Matthijs G; Borry P
    Patient Educ Couns; 2022 Nov; 105(11):3313-3318. PubMed ID: 35906131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reasons affecting the uptake of reproductive genetic carrier screening among nonpregnant reproductive-aged women in Flanders (Belgium).
    Van Steijvoort E; Demuynck R; Peeters H; Vandecruys H; Verguts J; Peeraer K; Matthijs G; Borry P
    J Genet Couns; 2022 Oct; 31(5):1043-1053. PubMed ID: 35385167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exploring attitudes and experiences with reproductive genetic carrier screening among couples seeking medically assisted reproduction: a longitudinal survey study.
    Van Steijvoort E; Cassou M; De Schutter C; Dimitriadou E; Peeters H; Peeraer K; Matthijs G; Borry P
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2024 Feb; 41(2):451-464. PubMed ID: 38175314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Knowledge, attitudes and preferences regarding reproductive genetic carrier screening among reproductive-aged men and women in Flanders (Belgium).
    Van Steijvoort E; Devolder H; Geysen I; Van Epperzeel S; Peeters H; Peeraer K; Matthijs G; Borry P
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2022 Nov; 30(11):1255-1261. PubMed ID: 35304601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Experiences of nonpregnant couples after receiving reproductive genetic carrier screening results in Belgium.
    Van Steijvoort E; Peeters H; Vandecruys H; Verguts J; Peeraer K; Matthijs G; Borry P
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2023 Jun; 31(6):696-702. PubMed ID: 36788144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Expanded carrier screening in Flanders (Belgium): an online survey on the perspectives of nonpregnant reproductive-aged women.
    Van Steijvoort E; Devolder H; Geysen I; Van Epperzeel S; Peeters H; Peeraer K; Matthijs G; Borry P
    Per Med; 2021 Jul; 18(4):361-373. PubMed ID: 34086508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What knowledge is required for an informed choice related to non-invasive prenatal screening?
    Griffin E; Hooker G; Grace M; Kaphingst K; Velez Edwards D; Zhao Z; Slamon J
    J Genet Couns; 2023 Aug; 32(4):812-822. PubMed ID: 36872475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development of a fragile X syndrome (FXS) knowledge scale: towards a modified multidimensional measure of informed choice for FXS population carrier screening.
    Ames AG; Jaques A; Ukoumunne OC; Archibald AD; Duncan RE; Emery J; Metcalfe SA
    Health Expect; 2015 Feb; 18(1):69-80. PubMed ID: 23067225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Educational tools support informed decision-making for genetic carrier screening in a heterogenic Israeli population.
    Gafni-Amsalem C; Aboleil-Zoubi O; Chervinsky E; Aleme O; Khayat M; Bashir H; Perets LP; Mamluk E; Hakrosh S; Kurtzman S; Tamir L; Baram-Tsabari A; Shalev SA
    J Community Genet; 2024 Apr; 15(2):137-146. PubMed ID: 38114746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interest in expanded carrier screening among individuals and couples in the general population: systematic review of the literature.
    Van Steijvoort E; Chokoshvili D; W Cannon J; Peeters H; Peeraer K; Matthijs G; Borry P
    Hum Reprod Update; 2020 Apr; 26(3):335-355. PubMed ID: 32099997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Couples' experiences with expanded carrier screening: evaluation of a university hospital screening offer.
    van Dijke I; Lakeman P; Sabiri N; Rusticus H; Ottenheim CPE; Mathijssen IB; Cornel MC; Henneman L
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2021 Aug; 29(8):1252-1258. PubMed ID: 34155360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does an educational video for aneuploidy screening improve informed choice among pregnant women? A randomised controlled trial.
    Xian Lim KM; Lewis C; Wong HC; Chong GSL; Gosavi A; Choolani MA
    Prenat Diagn; 2023 Jan; 43(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 36550063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Joint SOGC-CCMG Opinion for Reproductive Genetic Carrier Screening: An Update for All Canadian Providers of Maternity and Reproductive Healthcare in the Era of Direct-to-Consumer Testing.
    Wilson RD; De Bie I; Armour CM; Brown RN; Campagnolo C; Carroll JC; Okun N; Nelson T; Zwingerman R; Audibert F; Brock JA; Brown RN; Campagnolo C; Carroll JC; De Bie I; Johnson JA; Okun N; Pastruck M; Vallée-Pouliot K; Wilson RD; Zwingerman R; Armour C; Chitayat D; De Bie I; Fernandez S; Kim R; Lavoie J; Leonard N; Nelson T; Taylor S; Van Allen M; Van Karnebeek C
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2016 Aug; 38(8):742-762.e3. PubMed ID: 27638987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are pregnant women making informed choices about prenatal screening?
    van den Berg M; Timmermans DR; Ten Kate LP; van Vugt JM; van der Wal G
    Genet Med; 2005; 7(5):332-8. PubMed ID: 15915085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Informed choice and routinization of the second-trimester anomaly scan: a national cohort study in the Netherlands.
    Lust EER; Bronsgeest K; Henneman L; Crombag N; Bilardo CM; van Vliet-Lachotzki EH; Galjaard RH; Sikkel E; Haak MC; Bekker MN
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2023 Sep; 23(1):694. PubMed ID: 37752446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Informed choice of pregnant women regarding noninvasive prenatal testing in Korea: a cross-sectional study.
    Choi H
    Korean J Women Health Nurs; 2022 Sep; 28(3):235-249. PubMed ID: 36403575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development and validation of a measure of informed choice for women undergoing non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy.
    Lewis C; Hill M; Skirton H; Chitty LS
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2016 Jun; 24(6):809-16. PubMed ID: 26508572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The multi-dimensional measure of informed choice: a validation study.
    Michie S; Dormandy E; Marteau TM
    Patient Educ Couns; 2002 Sep; 48(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 12220754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Randomized controlled trial on the effect of an online decision aid for young female cancer patients regarding fertility preservation.
    Ehrbar V; Urech C; Rochlitz C; Zanetti Dällenbach R; Moffat R; Stiller R; Germeyer A; Nawroth F; Dangel A; Findeklee S; Tschudin S
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Sep; 34(9):1726-1734. PubMed ID: 31398258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Australian Reproductive Genetic Carrier Screening Project (Mackenzie's Mission): Design and Implementation.
    Archibald AD; McClaren BJ; Caruana J; Tutty E; King EA; Halliday JL; Best S; Kanga-Parabia A; Bennetts BH; Cliffe CC; Madelli EO; Ho G; Liebelt J; Long JC; Braithwaite J; Kennedy J; Massie J; Emery JD; McGaughran J; Marum JE; Boggs K; Barlow-Stewart K; Burnett L; Dive L; Freeman L; Davis MR; Downes MJ; Wallis M; Ferrie MM; Pachter N; Scuffham PA; Casella R; Allcock RJN; Ong R; Edwards S; Righetti S; Lunke S; Lewis S; Walker SP; Boughtwood TF; Hardy T; Newson AJ; Kirk EP; Laing NG; Delatycki MB; The Mackenzie's Mission Study Team
    J Pers Med; 2022 Oct; 12(11):. PubMed ID: 36579509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.