These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35906169)
21. Characterization of stimulus response curves obtained with transcranial magnetic stimulation from bilateral anterior digastric muscles in healthy subjects. Herbert P; Burke JR Somatosens Mot Res; 2021 Sep; 38(3):178-187. PubMed ID: 34126860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Ipsilateral motor responses to focal transcranial magnetic stimulation in healthy subjects and acute-stroke patients. Alagona G; Delvaux V; Gérard P; De Pasqua V; Pennisi G; Delwaide PJ; Nicoletti F; Maertens de Noordhout A Stroke; 2001 Jun; 32(6):1304-9. PubMed ID: 11387491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Physiological changes underlying bilateral isometric arm voluntary contractions in healthy humans. Soteropoulos DS; Perez MA J Neurophysiol; 2011 Apr; 105(4):1594-602. PubMed ID: 21273315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effects of remote muscle contraction on transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced motor evoked potentials and silent periods in humans. Tazoe T; Sakamoto M; Nakajima T; Endoh T; Komiyama T Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Jun; 118(6):1204-12. PubMed ID: 17449319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Measuring TMS stimulus/response characteristics from both hemispheres simultaneously for proximal and distal upper limb muscles. Ray JL; McNamara B; Priest A; Boniface SJ J Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 Aug; 19(4):371-5. PubMed ID: 12436091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Repetition suppression in transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced motor-evoked potentials is modulated by cortical inhibition. Kallioniemi E; Pääkkönen A; Julkunen P Neuroscience; 2015 Dec; 310():504-11. PubMed ID: 26427962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Resting and active motor thresholds versus stimulus-response curves to determine transcranial magnetic stimulation intensity in quadriceps femoris. Temesi J; Gruet M; Rupp T; Verges S; Millet GY J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2014 Mar; 11():40. PubMed ID: 24655366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Cortical motor representation of the ipsilateral hand and arm. Wassermann EM; Pascual-Leone A; Hallett M Exp Brain Res; 1994; 100(1):121-32. PubMed ID: 7813640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison between surface electrodes and ultrasound monitoring to measure TMS evoked muscle contraction. Kaczmarczyk I; Rawji V; Rothwell JC; Hodson-Tole E; Sharma N Muscle Nerve; 2021 May; 63(5):724-729. PubMed ID: 33533504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Transcranial magnetic stimulation with a half-sine wave pulse elicits direction-specific effects in human motor cortex. Jung NH; Delvendahl I; Pechmann A; Gleich B; Gattinger N; Siebner HR; Mall V BMC Neurosci; 2012 Nov; 13():139. PubMed ID: 23126287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Theta burst stimulation does not reliably depress all regions of the human motor cortex. Martin PG; Gandevia SC; Taylor JL Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Dec; 117(12):2684-90. PubMed ID: 17029949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Functional demanded excitability changes of human hand motor area. Ni Z; Takahashi M; Yamashita T; Liang N; Tanaka Y; Tsuji T; Yahagi S; Kasai T Exp Brain Res; 2006 Apr; 170(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 16328281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Facilitatory conditioning of the supplementary motor area in humans enhances the corticophrenic responsiveness to transcranial magnetic stimulation. Raux M; Xie H; Similowski T; Koski L J Appl Physiol (1985); 2010 Jan; 108(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 19892923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Further insight into the task-dependent excitability of motor evoked potentials in first dorsal interosseous muscle in humans. Hasegawa Y; Kasai T; Tsuji T; Yahagi S Exp Brain Res; 2001 Oct; 140(4):387-96. PubMed ID: 11685391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Detecting cortical circuits resonant to high-frequency oscillations in the human primary motor cortex: a TMS-tACS study. Guerra A; Ranieri F; Falato E; Musumeci G; Di Santo A; Asci F; Di Pino G; Suppa A; Berardelli A; Di Lazzaro V Sci Rep; 2020 May; 10(1):7695. PubMed ID: 32376946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation test intensity on the amplitude, variability and reliability of motor evoked potentials. Pellegrini M; Zoghi M; Jaberzadeh S Brain Res; 2018 Dec; 1700():190-198. PubMed ID: 30194017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effects of a common transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) protocol on motor evoked potentials found to be highly variable within individuals over 9 testing sessions. Horvath JC; Vogrin SJ; Carter O; Cook MJ; Forte JD Exp Brain Res; 2016 Sep; 234(9):2629-42. PubMed ID: 27150317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Automated TMS hotspot-hunting using a closed loop threshold-based algorithm. Meincke J; Hewitt M; Batsikadze G; Liebetanz D Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 124(Pt A):509-517. PubMed ID: 26385012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Influence of different transcranial magnetic stimulation current directions on the corticomotor control of lumbar erector spinae muscles during a static task. Desmons M; Rohel A; Desgagnés A; Mercier C; Massé-Alarie H J Neurophysiol; 2021 Oct; 126(4):1276-1288. PubMed ID: 34550037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]