These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35909005)

  • 1. Practice patterns and 90-day treatment-related morbidity in early-stage cervical cancer.
    Bogani G; Donato VD; Scambia G; Landoni F; Ghezzi F; Muzii L; Panici PB; Raspagliesi F;
    Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Sep; 166(3):561-566. PubMed ID: 35909005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing the role of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer.
    Bogani G; Di Donato V; Muzii L; Casarin J; Ghezzi F; Malzoni M; Greggi S; Landoni F; Bazzurini L; Zanagnolo V; Multinu F; Angioli R; Plotti F; Caruso G; Fischetti M; Ferrandina G; Palaia I; Benedetti Panici P; Scambia G; Raspagliesi F
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Aug; 275():64-69. PubMed ID: 35753229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term oncological outcomes of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A retrospective, single-institutional study in the wake of the LACC trial.
    Kanno K; Andou M; Yanai S; Toeda M; Nimura R; Ichikawa F; Teishikata Y; Shirane T; Sakate S; Kihira T; Hamasaki Y; Sawada M; Shirane A; Ota Y
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Dec; 45(12):2425-2434. PubMed ID: 31502349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Practice patterns and complications of hysterectomy for invasive cervical cancer after the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer trial.
    Schivardi G; Casarin J; Habermann EB; Bews KA; Langstraat CL; Cliby W; Cucinella G; De Vitis LA; Ramirez PT; Aletti GD; Mariani A; Multinu F
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Jan; 230(1):69.e1-69.e10. PubMed ID: 37690596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer.
    Bogani G; Di Donato V; Scambia G; Raspagliesi F; Chiantera V; Sozzi G; Golia D'Augè T; Muzii L; Benedetti Panici P; D'Oria O; Vizza E; Giannini A; On Behalf Of The Investigators Of The Italian Gynecological Cancer Study Group
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Sep; 19(18):. PubMed ID: 36141917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with transvaginal closure of vaginal cuff - a multicenter analysis.
    Kohler C; Hertel H; Herrmann J; Marnitz S; Mallmann P; Favero G; Plaikner A; Martus P; Gajda M; Schneider A
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jun; 29(5):845-850. PubMed ID: 31155516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Incidence of adverse events in minimally invasive vs open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer: results of a randomized controlled trial.
    Obermair A; Asher R; Pareja R; Frumovitz M; Lopez A; Moretti-Marques R; Rendon G; Ribeiro R; Tsunoda A; Behan V; Buda A; Bernadini MQ; Zhao H; Vieira M; Walker J; Spirtos NM; Yao S; Chetty N; Zhu T; Isla D; Tamura M; Nicklin J; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Coleman RL; Salvo G; Ramirez PT
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Mar; 222(3):249.e1-249.e10. PubMed ID: 31586602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pattern of relapse in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer after radical hysterectomy as primary treatment. Minimally invasive surgery vs. open approach. Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Manzour N; Núñez-Cordoba JM; Chiva L; Chacón E; Boria F; Vara-García J; Rodriguez-Velandia YP; Minguez JA; Alcazar JL
    Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Feb; 164(2):455-460. PubMed ID: 34848071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of laparoscopic and open radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤2 cm.
    Chen X; Zhao N; Ye P; Chen J; Nan X; Zhao H; Zhou K; Zhang Y; Xue J; Zhou H; Shang H; Zhu H; Leanne VM; Yan X
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 May; 30(5):564-571. PubMed ID: 32276941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy without uterine manipulator for cervical cancer stage IB: description of the technique, our experience and results after the era of LACC trial.
    Kavallaris A; Chalvatzas N; Gkoutzioulis A; Zygouris D
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Apr; 303(4):1039-1047. PubMed ID: 33068159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.
    Ramirez PT; Frumovitz M; Pareja R; Lopez A; Vieira M; Ribeiro R; Buda A; Yan X; Shuzhong Y; Chetty N; Isla D; Tamura M; Zhu T; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Asher R; Behan V; Nicklin JL; Coleman RL; Obermair A
    N Engl J Med; 2018 Nov; 379(20):1895-1904. PubMed ID: 30380365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Oncologic results and surgical morbidity of laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in the treatment of FIGO stage IB cervical cancer: long-term follow-up.
    Park NY; Chong GO; Hong DG; Cho YL; Park IS; Lee YS
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2011 Feb; 21(2):355-62. PubMed ID: 21270616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Trends in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Management in the US: A National Cancer Database Analysis.
    Wolf J; Wu Y; Hayek J; Zhang Q; Alagkiozidis I
    Curr Oncol; 2024 May; 31(5):2836-2845. PubMed ID: 38785496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A multicenter non-inferior randomized controlled study comparing the efficacy of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer (stages IB1, IB2, and IIA1): study protocol of the LAUNCH 2 trial.
    Wu X; Qiu L; Lou W; Wang X; Zhu T; Zhang Y; Hu W; Xue X; Zhu Z; Xiang L; Li J; Fang X; Gao S; Feng H; Diao W; Zhang H; Du M; Bai Y; Hou Y; Yan W; Feng H; Yu H; Zhu S; Du Y; Jiang H
    Trials; 2022 Apr; 23(1):269. PubMed ID: 35395868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of surgical approach on oncologic outcomes in women undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
    Cusimano MC; Baxter NN; Gien LT; Moineddin R; Liu N; Dossa F; Willows K; Ferguson SE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 221(6):619.e1-619.e24. PubMed ID: 31288006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retrospective comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Cai J; Yang L; Dong W; Wang H; Xiong Z; Wang Z
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Jan; 132(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 26434669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outcomes of Minimally Invasive versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer Incorporating 2018 FIGO Staging.
    Levine MD; Brown J; Crane EK; Tait DL; Naumann RW
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 28(4):824-828. PubMed ID: 32730990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preoperative Conization and Risk of Recurrence in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer: A Multicenter Study.
    Casarin J; Bogani G; Papadia A; Ditto A; Pinelli C; Garzon S; Donadello N; Laganà AS; Cromi A; Mueller M; Raspagliesi F; Ghezzi F
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Jan; 28(1):117-123. PubMed ID: 32320800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of outcomes between abdominal, minimally invasive and combined vaginal-laparoscopic hysterectomy in patients with stage IAI/IA2 cervical cancer: 4C (Canadian Cervical Cancer Collaborative) study.
    Piedimonte S; Pond GR; Plante M; Nelson G; Kwon J; Altman A; Feigenberg T; Elit L; Lau S; Sabourin J; Willows K; Aubrey C; Jang JH; Teo-Fortin LA; Cockburn N; Saunders NB; Shamiya S; Helpman L; Vicus D;
    Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Aug; 166(2):230-235. PubMed ID: 35644731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of abdominal and minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer.
    Kim SI; Lee J; Hong J; Lee SJ; Park DC; Yoon JH
    Int J Med Sci; 2021; 18(5):1312-1317. PubMed ID: 33526992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.