These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35909005)

  • 21. Feasibility and outcome of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with no-look no-touch technique for FIGO IB1 cervical cancer.
    Kanao H; Matsuo K; Aoki Y; Tanigawa T; Nomura H; Okamoto S; Takeshima N
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 May; 30(3):e71. PubMed ID: 30887768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy: an analysis of oncologic outcomes from Hospital Italiano (Argentina).
    Odetto D; Puga MC; Saadi J; Noll F; Perrotta M
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jun; 29(5):863-868. PubMed ID: 31155517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Laparo-assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy as a safe option for Minimal Invasive Surgery in early stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ronsini C; Köhler C; De Franciscis P; La Verde M; Mosca L; Solazzo MC; Colacurci N
    Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Jul; 166(1):188-195. PubMed ID: 35513934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Robot-assisted approach to cervical cancer (RACC): an international multi-center, open-label randomized controlled trial.
    Falconer H; Palsdottir K; Stalberg K; Dahm-Kähler P; Ottander U; Lundin ES; Wijk L; Kimmig R; Jensen PT; Zahl Eriksson AG; Mäenpää J; Persson J; Salehi S
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jul; 29(6):1072-1076. PubMed ID: 31203203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An Australian, single-centre study of surgical management outcomes for early-stage cervical cancer.
    Weishaupt J; Saidi S; Carter J
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 Feb; 61(1):123-127. PubMed ID: 33176013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a case control study.
    Vizza E; Corrado G; Mancini E; Vici P; Sergi D; Baiocco E; Patrizi L; Saltari M; Pomati G; Cutillo G
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):142-7. PubMed ID: 24063966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Patterns of recurrence after laparoscopic versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.
    Bogani G; Ghezzi F; Chiva L; Gisone B; Pinelli C; Dell'Acqua A; Casarin J; Ditto A; Raspagliesi F
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jul; 30(7):987-992. PubMed ID: 32448809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Perioperative morbidity of different operative approaches in early cervical carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy.
    Kampers J; Gerhardt E; Sibbertsen P; Flock T; Hertel H; Klapdor R; Jentschke M; Hillemanns P
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Aug; 306(2):295-314. PubMed ID: 34625835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Decreasing utilization of minimally invasive hysterectomy for cervical cancer in the United States.
    Matsuo K; Mandelbaum RS; Klar M; Ciesielski KM; Matsushima K; Matsuzaki S; Roman LD; Wright JD
    Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Jul; 162(1):43-49. PubMed ID: 33992450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Introducing nerve-sparing approach during minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for locally-advanced cervical cancer: A multi-institutional experience.
    Raspagliesi F; Bogani G; Spinillo A; Ditto A; Bogliolo S; Casarin J; Leone Roberti Maggiore U; Martinelli F; Signorelli M; Gardella B; Chiappa V; Scaffa C; Ferrero S; Cromi A; Lorusso D; Ghezzi F
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Nov; 43(11):2150-2156. PubMed ID: 28927778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy after initial brachytherapy for stage IB1 cervical cancer: feasibility and results].
    Uzan C; Nikpayam M; Merlot B; Gouy S; Belghiti J; Haie-Meder C; Nickers P; Narducci F; Morice P; Leblanc E
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2013 Oct; 41(10):571-7. PubMed ID: 24139815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Minimally invasive surgical management of early-stage cervical cancer: an analysis of the risk factors of surgical complications and of oncologic outcomes.
    Garabedian C; Merlot B; Bresson L; Tresch E; Narducci F; Leblanc E
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 May; 25(4):714-21. PubMed ID: 25647258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Laparotomic radical hysterectomy versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy using vaginal colpotomy for the management of stage IB1 to IIA2 cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
    Yang EJ; Kim NR; Lee AJ; Shim SH; Lee SJ
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Feb; 101(8):e28911. PubMed ID: 35212297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy for stage IB2-IIB cervical cancer in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a multi-institutional cohort study.
    Ghezzi F; Cromi A; Ditto A; Vizza E; Malzoni M; Raspagliesi F; Uccella S; Corrado G; Cosentino F; Gotsch F; Martinelli F; Franchi M
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Jun; 20(6):2007-15. PubMed ID: 23224830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: the Right Surgical Approach.
    Brandt B; Levin G; Leitao MM
    Curr Treat Options Oncol; 2022 Jan; 23(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 35167007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Safety and efficacy study of laparoscopic or robotic radical surgery using an endoscopic stapler for inhibiting tumour spillage of cervical malignant neoplasms evaluating survival (SOLUTION): a multi-centre, open-label, single-arm, phase II trial protocol.
    Park SJ; Kong TW; Kim T; Lee M; Choi CH; Shim SH; Yim GW; Lee S; Lee EJ; Lim MC; Chang SJ; Lee SJ; Lee SH; Song T; Lee YY; Kim HS; Nam EJ
    BMC Cancer; 2022 Mar; 22(1):331. PubMed ID: 35346103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: a multicenter analysis.
    Rodriguez J; Rauh-Hain JA; Saenz J; Isla DO; Rendon Pereira GJ; Odetto D; Martinelli F; Villoslada V; Zapardiel I; Trujillo LM; Perez M; Hernandez M; Saadi JM; Raspagliesi F; Valdivia H; Siegrist J; Fu S; Hernandez Nava M; Echeverry L; Noll F; Ditto A; Lopez A; Hernandez A; Pareja R
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2021 Apr; 31(4):504-511. PubMed ID: 33504547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
    Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Observational BGOG Study of the Results of Robot-assisted Laparoscopy in 166 Patients with FIGO 2009 Stage IA1-IB1 Cervical Cancer.
    de Bruyn A; Peeters F; Smulders K; Goffin F; Traen K; Van Trappen P; Vergote I
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 28(11):1920-1926. PubMed ID: 34000393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Comparative analysis of the prognosis of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer undergoing laparoscopic or abdominal surgery].
    Xu YP; Wang ZQ; Liang XD; Wang Y; Wang JL
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 55(9):609-616. PubMed ID: 32957749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.