156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35909005)
21. Feasibility and outcome of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with no-look no-touch technique for FIGO IB1 cervical cancer.
Kanao H; Matsuo K; Aoki Y; Tanigawa T; Nomura H; Okamoto S; Takeshima N
J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 May; 30(3):e71. PubMed ID: 30887768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy: an analysis of oncologic outcomes from Hospital Italiano (Argentina).
Odetto D; Puga MC; Saadi J; Noll F; Perrotta M
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jun; 29(5):863-868. PubMed ID: 31155517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Laparo-assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy as a safe option for Minimal Invasive Surgery in early stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ronsini C; Köhler C; De Franciscis P; La Verde M; Mosca L; Solazzo MC; Colacurci N
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Jul; 166(1):188-195. PubMed ID: 35513934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Robot-assisted approach to cervical cancer (RACC): an international multi-center, open-label randomized controlled trial.
Falconer H; Palsdottir K; Stalberg K; Dahm-Kähler P; Ottander U; Lundin ES; Wijk L; Kimmig R; Jensen PT; Zahl Eriksson AG; Mäenpää J; Persson J; Salehi S
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jul; 29(6):1072-1076. PubMed ID: 31203203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. An Australian, single-centre study of surgical management outcomes for early-stage cervical cancer.
Weishaupt J; Saidi S; Carter J
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 Feb; 61(1):123-127. PubMed ID: 33176013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a case control study.
Vizza E; Corrado G; Mancini E; Vici P; Sergi D; Baiocco E; Patrizi L; Saltari M; Pomati G; Cutillo G
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):142-7. PubMed ID: 24063966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Patterns of recurrence after laparoscopic versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.
Bogani G; Ghezzi F; Chiva L; Gisone B; Pinelli C; Dell'Acqua A; Casarin J; Ditto A; Raspagliesi F
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jul; 30(7):987-992. PubMed ID: 32448809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Perioperative morbidity of different operative approaches in early cervical carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy.
Kampers J; Gerhardt E; Sibbertsen P; Flock T; Hertel H; Klapdor R; Jentschke M; Hillemanns P
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Aug; 306(2):295-314. PubMed ID: 34625835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Retrospective Analysis of Cervical Cancer Treatment Outcomes: Ten Years of Experience with the Vaginal Assisted Radical Laparoscopic Hysterectomy VARLH.
Wojdat R; Malanowska E
Biomed Res Int; 2022; 2022():5163886. PubMed ID: 35047636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Decreasing utilization of minimally invasive hysterectomy for cervical cancer in the United States.
Matsuo K; Mandelbaum RS; Klar M; Ciesielski KM; Matsushima K; Matsuzaki S; Roman LD; Wright JD
Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Jul; 162(1):43-49. PubMed ID: 33992450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Introducing nerve-sparing approach during minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for locally-advanced cervical cancer: A multi-institutional experience.
Raspagliesi F; Bogani G; Spinillo A; Ditto A; Bogliolo S; Casarin J; Leone Roberti Maggiore U; Martinelli F; Signorelli M; Gardella B; Chiappa V; Scaffa C; Ferrero S; Cromi A; Lorusso D; Ghezzi F
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Nov; 43(11):2150-2156. PubMed ID: 28927778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy after initial brachytherapy for stage IB1 cervical cancer: feasibility and results].
Uzan C; Nikpayam M; Merlot B; Gouy S; Belghiti J; Haie-Meder C; Nickers P; Narducci F; Morice P; Leblanc E
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2013 Oct; 41(10):571-7. PubMed ID: 24139815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Minimally invasive surgical management of early-stage cervical cancer: an analysis of the risk factors of surgical complications and of oncologic outcomes.
Garabedian C; Merlot B; Bresson L; Tresch E; Narducci F; Leblanc E
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 May; 25(4):714-21. PubMed ID: 25647258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Laparotomic radical hysterectomy versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy using vaginal colpotomy for the management of stage IB1 to IIA2 cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
Yang EJ; Kim NR; Lee AJ; Shim SH; Lee SJ
Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Feb; 101(8):e28911. PubMed ID: 35212297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy for stage IB2-IIB cervical cancer in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a multi-institutional cohort study.
Ghezzi F; Cromi A; Ditto A; Vizza E; Malzoni M; Raspagliesi F; Uccella S; Corrado G; Cosentino F; Gotsch F; Martinelli F; Franchi M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Jun; 20(6):2007-15. PubMed ID: 23224830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: the Right Surgical Approach.
Brandt B; Levin G; Leitao MM
Curr Treat Options Oncol; 2022 Jan; 23(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 35167007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Safety and efficacy study of laparoscopic or robotic radical surgery using an endoscopic stapler for inhibiting tumour spillage of cervical malignant neoplasms evaluating survival (SOLUTION): a multi-centre, open-label, single-arm, phase II trial protocol.
Park SJ; Kong TW; Kim T; Lee M; Choi CH; Shim SH; Yim GW; Lee S; Lee EJ; Lim MC; Chang SJ; Lee SJ; Lee SH; Song T; Lee YY; Kim HS; Nam EJ
BMC Cancer; 2022 Mar; 22(1):331. PubMed ID: 35346103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: a multicenter analysis.
Rodriguez J; Rauh-Hain JA; Saenz J; Isla DO; Rendon Pereira GJ; Odetto D; Martinelli F; Villoslada V; Zapardiel I; Trujillo LM; Perez M; Hernandez M; Saadi JM; Raspagliesi F; Valdivia H; Siegrist J; Fu S; Hernandez Nava M; Echeverry L; Noll F; Ditto A; Lopez A; Hernandez A; Pareja R
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2021 Apr; 31(4):504-511. PubMed ID: 33504547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Observational BGOG Study of the Results of Robot-assisted Laparoscopy in 166 Patients with FIGO 2009 Stage IA1-IB1 Cervical Cancer.
de Bruyn A; Peeters F; Smulders K; Goffin F; Traen K; Van Trappen P; Vergote I
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 28(11):1920-1926. PubMed ID: 34000393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
