These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35911811)

  • 1. Comparative assessment of cephalometric with its analogous photographic variables.
    Gupta S; Tandon P; Singh GP; Shastri D
    Natl J Maxillofac Surg; 2022; 13(1):99-107. PubMed ID: 35911811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Photographic Assessment of Cephalometric Measurements in Skeletal Class II Cases: A Comparative Study.
    Mehta P; Sagarkar RM; Mathew S
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2017 Jun; 11(6):ZC60-ZC64. PubMed ID: 28764295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Photographic assessment of cephalometric measurements.
    de Carvalho Rosas Gomes L; Horta KO; Gandini LG; Gonçalves M; Gonçalves JR
    Angle Orthod; 2013 Nov; 83(6):1049-58. PubMed ID: 23597034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Correlations between cephalometric and facial photographic measurements of craniofacial form.
    Zhang X; Hans MG; Graham G; Kirchner HL; Redline S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jan; 131(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 17208108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Photography versus lateral cephalogram: role in facial diagnosis.
    Patel DP; Trivedi R
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(5):587-92. PubMed ID: 24355960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Photographic Frankfort plane subnasale pogonion (FSA) angle for assessment of anteroposterior discrepancies in malocclusion subjects: A prospective study.
    Rebekah R; Jain RK; Balasubramaniam A; Sreenivasagan S
    J Orthod Sci; 2023; 12():57. PubMed ID: 37881674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Correlation of a Novel Photographic Parameter for Facial Profile Assessment in Subjects With Different Sagittal Malocclusions: A Prospective Study.
    Sankaranarayanan RR; Jain RK
    Cureus; 2023 Sep; 15(9):e44553. PubMed ID: 37790048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparative study of linear measurements on facial skeleton with frontal and lateral cephalogram.
    Gandikota CS; Rayapudi N; Challa PL; Juvvadi SR; Yudhister PV; Rao GH
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2012 Apr; 3(2):176-9. PubMed ID: 22919218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Photogrammetric reliability of frontal facial photographs with radiographs and anthropometric measurements.
    Negi G; Chitra P
    J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2019; 9(3):280-285. PubMed ID: 31289717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative Assessment of Various Cephalometric Parameters Used for Determining Vertical Skeletal Dysplasia.
    Roy P; Roy P; Koley S
    Cureus; 2024 Feb; 16(2):e55101. PubMed ID: 38558743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cephalometric Predictors of Clinical Severity in Treacher Collins Syndrome.
    Esenlik E; Plana NM; Grayson BH; Flores RL
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 Dec; 140(6):1240-1249. PubMed ID: 28820843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Photogrammetric Correlation of Face with Frontal Radiographs and Direct Measurements.
    Negi G; Ponnada S; Aravind NKS; Chitra P
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2017 May; 11(5):ZC79-ZC83. PubMed ID: 28658914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative study of cephalometric measurements using 3 imaging modalities.
    Wen J; Liu S; Ye X; Xie X; Li J; Li H; Mei L
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2017 Dec; 148(12):913-921. PubMed ID: 29042006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative evaluation of cephalometric measurements of monitor-displayed images by Nemoceph software and its hard copy by manual tracing.
    Tikku T; Khanna R; Maurya RP; Srivastava K; Bhushan R
    J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2014; 4(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 25737917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Smile analysis in different facial patterns and its correlation with underlying hard tissues.
    Grover N; Kapoor DN; Verma S; Bharadwaj P
    Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():28. PubMed ID: 26341345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability of Photogrammetric Landmarks to the Conventional Cephalogram for Analyzing Soft-Tissue Landmarks in Orthodontics.
    Jaiswal P; Gandhi A; Gupta AR; Malik N; Singh SK; Ramesh K
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2021 Jun; 13(Suppl 1):S171-S175. PubMed ID: 34447068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cephalometric assessment of craniofacial morphology in patients with treacher Collins syndrome.
    Kapadia H; Shetye PR; Grayson BH; McCarthy JG
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 24(4):1141-5. PubMed ID: 23851757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cephalometric features in isolated growth hormone deficiency.
    Oliveira-Neto LA; Melo Mde F; Franco AA; Oliveira AH; Souza AH; Valença EH; Britto IM; Salvatori R; Aguiar-Oliveira MH
    Angle Orthod; 2011 Jul; 81(4):578-83. PubMed ID: 21341997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Vertical facial height and its correlation with facial width and depth: Three dimensional cone beam computed tomography evaluation based on dry skulls.
    Wang MF; Otsuka T; Akimoto S; Sato S
    Int J Stomatol Occlusion Med; 2013; 6(4):120-129. PubMed ID: 24273616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correlation between cephalometric variables and obstructive sleep apnoea severity in children.
    Galeotti A; Festa P; Viarani V; Pavone M; Sitzia E; Piga S; Cutrera R; De Vincentiis GC; D'Antò V
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2019 Mar; 20(1):43-47. PubMed ID: 30919644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.