148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35912877)
21. Automated proton treatment planning with robust optimization using constrained hierarchical optimization.
Taasti VT; Hong L; Deasy JO; Zarepisheh M
Med Phys; 2020 Jul; 47(7):2779-2790. PubMed ID: 32196679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Dosimetric comparison of intensity modulated radiotherapy and intensity modulated proton therapy in the treatment of recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Hung HM; Chan OCM; Mak CH; Hung WM; Ng WT; Lee MCH
Med Dosim; 2022 Spring; 47(1):14-19. PubMed ID: 34470708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Dosimetric advantages of IMPT over IMRT for laser-accelerated proton beams.
Luo W; Li J; Fourkal E; Fan J; Xu X; Chen Z; Jin L; Price R; Ma CM
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Dec; 53(24):7151-66. PubMed ID: 19033641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Hybrid proton-photon inverse optimization with uniformity-regularized proton and photon target dose.
Gao H
Phys Med Biol; 2019 May; 64(10):105003. PubMed ID: 30978714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Dose and robustness comparison of nominal, daily and accumulated doses for photon and proton treatment of sinonasal cancer.
Argota-Perez R; Sharma MB; Elstrøm UV; Møller DS; Grau C; Jensen K; Holm AIS; Korreman SS
Radiother Oncol; 2022 Aug; 173():102-108. PubMed ID: 35667574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Impact of Spot Size and Spacing on the Quality of Robustly Optimized Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Plans for Lung Cancer.
Liu C; Schild SE; Chang JY; Liao Z; Korte S; Shen J; Ding X; Hu Y; Kang Y; Keole SR; Sio TT; Wong WW; Sahoo N; Bues M; Liu W
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2018 Jun; 101(2):479-489. PubMed ID: 29550033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The Role of Plan Robustness Evaluation in Comparing Protons and Photons Plans - An Application on IMPT and IMRT Plans in Skull Base Chordomas.
Noufal MP; Widesott L; Sharma SD; Righetto R; Cianchetti M; Schwarz M
J Med Phys; 2020; 45(4):206-214. PubMed ID: 33953495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Limited Impact of Setup and Range Uncertainties, Breathing Motion, and Interplay Effects in Robustly Optimized Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.
Inoue T; Widder J; van Dijk LV; Takegawa H; Koizumi M; Takashina M; Usui K; Kurokawa C; Sugimoto S; Saito AI; Sasai K; Van't Veld AA; Langendijk JA; Korevaar EW
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 Nov; 96(3):661-9. PubMed ID: 27681763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Automated Robust Proton Planning Using Dose-Volume Histogram-Based Mimicking of the Photon Reference Dose and Reducing Organ at Risk Dose Optimization.
Kierkels RGJ; Fredriksson A; Both S; Langendijk JA; Scandurra D; Korevaar EW
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2019 Jan; 103(1):251-258. PubMed ID: 30145392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effectiveness of robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy planning for head and neck cancers.
Liu W; Frank SJ; Li X; Li Y; Park PC; Dong L; Ronald Zhu X; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051711. PubMed ID: 23635259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Robust mixed electron-photon radiation therapy optimization.
Renaud MA; Serban M; Seuntjens J
Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1384-1396. PubMed ID: 30628079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Minimax optimization for handling range and setup uncertainties in proton therapy.
Fredriksson A; Forsgren A; Hårdemark B
Med Phys; 2011 Mar; 38(3):1672-84. PubMed ID: 21520880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Robust intensity-modulated proton therapy to reduce high linear energy transfer in organs at risk.
An Y; Shan J; Patel SH; Wong W; Schild SE; Ding X; Bues M; Liu W
Med Phys; 2017 Dec; 44(12):6138-6147. PubMed ID: 28976574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Feasibility and robustness of dose painting by numbers in proton therapy with contour-driven plan optimization.
Barragán AM; Differding S; Janssens G; Lee JA; Sterpin E
Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):2006-17. PubMed ID: 25832091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Introduce a rotational robust optimization framework for spot-scanning proton arc (SPArc) therapy.
Chang S; Liu G; Zhao L; Zheng W; Yan D; Chen P; Li X; Deraniyagala R; Stevens C; Grills I; Chinnaiyan P; Li X; Ding X
Phys Med Biol; 2022 Dec; 68(1):. PubMed ID: 36546347
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Mixed integer programming with dose-volume constraints in intensity-modulated proton therapy.
Zhang P; Fan N; Shan J; Schild SE; Bues M; Liu W
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 18(5):29-35. PubMed ID: 28681976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) - The future of IMRT for head and neck cancer.
Moreno AC; Frank SJ; Garden AS; Rosenthal DI; Fuller CD; Gunn GB; Reddy JP; Morrison WH; Williamson TD; Holliday EB; Phan J; Blanchard P
Oral Oncol; 2019 Jan; 88():66-74. PubMed ID: 30616799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Impact of robust treatment planning on single- and multi-field optimized plans for proton beam therapy of unilateral head and neck target volumes.
Cubillos-Mesías M; Baumann M; Troost EGC; Lohaus F; Löck S; Richter C; Stützer K
Radiat Oncol; 2017 Nov; 12(1):190. PubMed ID: 29183377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Robust spatiotemporal fractionation schemes in the presence of patient setup uncertainty.
Gaddy MR; Unkelbach J; Papp D
Med Phys; 2019 Jul; 46(7):2988-3000. PubMed ID: 31087677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Robust optimization of intensity modulated proton therapy.
Liu W; Zhang X; Li Y; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):1079-91. PubMed ID: 22320818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
