172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35913623)
1. Clavien-Dindo classification and risk prediction model of complications after robot-assisted radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
Ling H; Wang G; Yi B; Li Z; Zhu S
J Robot Surg; 2023 Apr; 17(2):527-536. PubMed ID: 35913623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Introduction of robot-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: impact on complications, costs and oncologic outcome.
Wallin E; Flöter Rådestad A; Falconer H
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 May; 96(5):536-542. PubMed ID: 28186616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction of perioperative complications after robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer using the modified surgical Apgar score.
Park SH; Lee JY; Nam EJ; Kim S; Kim SW; Kim YT
BMC Cancer; 2018 Sep; 18(1):908. PubMed ID: 30241512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robotic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Population-Based Study of Adoption and Immediate Postoperative Outcomes in the United States.
Piedimonte S; Czuzoj-Shulman N; Gotlieb W; Abenhaim HA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):551-557. PubMed ID: 30195078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a case control study.
Vizza E; Corrado G; Mancini E; Vici P; Sergi D; Baiocco E; Patrizi L; Saltari M; Pomati G; Cutillo G
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):142-7. PubMed ID: 24063966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sexual, bladder, bowel and ovarian function 1 year after robot-assisted radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer.
Wallin E; Falconer H; Rådestad AF
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Nov; 98(11):1404-1412. PubMed ID: 31237957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robot-assisted versus open radical hysterectomy: A multi-institutional experience for early-stage cervical cancer.
Sert BM; Boggess JF; Ahmad S; Jackson AL; Stavitzski NM; Dahl AA; Holloway RW
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Apr; 42(4):513-22. PubMed ID: 26843445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison between robot-assisted radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A multicentre retrospective study.
Chen B; Ji M; Li P; Liu P; Zou W; Zhao Z; Qu B; Li Z; Bin X; Lang J; Wang H; Chen C
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 May; 157(2):429-436. PubMed ID: 32067814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative outcomes between robotic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for IB1 cervical cancer: Results from a single high volume institution.
Doo DW; Kirkland CT; Griswold LH; McGwin G; Huh WK; Leath CA; Kim KH
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 May; 153(2):242-247. PubMed ID: 30850169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotic radical hysterectomy is superior to laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.
Jin YM; Liu SS; Chen J; Chen YN; Ren CC
PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193033. PubMed ID: 29554090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy and safety outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy in Chinese older women with cervical cancer compared with laparoscopic radical hysterectomy.
Luo C; Liu M; Li X
BMC Womens Health; 2018 May; 18(1):61. PubMed ID: 29716555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The institutional learning curve is associated with survival outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer-a retrospective study.
Eoh KJ; Lee JY; Nam EJ; Kim S; Kim SW; Kim YT
BMC Cancer; 2020 Feb; 20(1):152. PubMed ID: 32093687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic-Assisted Radical Hysterectomy Results in Better Surgical Outcomes Compared With the Traditional Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for the Treatment of Cervical Cancer.
Nie JC; Yan AQ; Liu XS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Nov; 27(9):1990-1999. PubMed ID: 28858908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Grading evaluation of operative complications and analysis of related risk factors in patients with stage Ⅰ endometrial cancer treated by robotic-assisted and traditional laparoscopic surgery].
Guo RX; Du JM; Wang PR; Li BJ; Li LX; Wang Q; Bai J
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Feb; 55(2):112-119. PubMed ID: 32146740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Perioperative Complications and Safety Evaluation of Robot-Assisted Radical Hysterectomy of Cervical Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.
Chang WF; Luo AJ; Yuan YF; Chen Y; Xin ZR; Xu SS
Cancer Manag Res; 2020; 12():4483-4492. PubMed ID: 32606942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robot-assisted versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer, a review.
Kruijdenberg CB; van den Einden LC; Hendriks JC; Zusterzeel PL; Bekkers RL
Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Mar; 120(3):334-9. PubMed ID: 21236473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perioperative complications of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery using three robotic arms at a single institution.
Yim GW; Kim SW; Nam EJ; Kim S; Kim YT
Yonsei Med J; 2015 Mar; 56(2):474-81. PubMed ID: 25683998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Oncological outcome and long-term complications in robot-assisted radical surgery for early stage cervical cancer: an observational cohort study.
Hoogendam JP; Verheijen RH; Wegner I; Zweemer RP
BJOG; 2014 Nov; 121(12):1538-45. PubMed ID: 24735243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robotic Radical Hysterectomy After Concomitant Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Prospective Phase II Study.
Gallotta V; Chiantera V; Conte C; Vizzielli G; Fagotti A; Nero C; Costantini B; Lucidi A; Cicero C; Scambia G; Ferrandina G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):133-139. PubMed ID: 27666513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Learning curve could affect oncologic outcome of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
Kim S; Min KJ; Lee S; Hong JH; Song JY; Lee JK; Lee NW
Asian J Surg; 2021 Jan; 44(1):174-180. PubMed ID: 32467009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
