140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35913644)
41. A novel and fully automated mammographic texture analysis for risk prediction: results from two case-control studies.
Wang C; Brentnall AR; Cuzick J; Harkness EF; Evans DG; Astley S
Breast Cancer Res; 2017 Oct; 19(1):114. PubMed ID: 29047382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Automated Volumetric Mammographic Breast Density Measurements May Underestimate Percent Breast Density for High-density Breasts.
Rahbar K; Gubern-Merida A; Patrie JT; Harvey JA
Acad Radiol; 2017 Dec; 24(12):1561-1569. PubMed ID: 28754209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Adjusting for BMI in analyses of volumetric mammographic density and breast cancer risk.
Hudson S; Vik Hjerkind K; Vinnicombe S; Allen S; Trewin C; Ursin G; Dos-Santos-Silva I; De Stavola BL
Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Dec; 20(1):156. PubMed ID: 30594212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Fully automated measurements of volumetric breast density adapted for BIRADS 5th edition: a comparison with visual assessment.
Youk JH; Gweon HM; Son EJ; Eun NL; Kim JA
Acta Radiol; 2021 Sep; 62(9):1148-1154. PubMed ID: 32910685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Exploring the prediction performance for breast cancer risk based on volumetric mammographic density at different thresholds.
Wang C; Brentnall AR; Cuzick J; Harkness EF; Evans DG; Astley S
Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Jun; 20(1):49. PubMed ID: 29884207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Comparison of Clinical and Automated Breast Density Measurements: Implications for Risk Prediction and Supplemental Screening.
Brandt KR; Scott CG; Ma L; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Jensen MR; Whaley DH; Wu FF; Malkov S; Hruska CB; Norman AD; Heine J; Shepherd J; Pankratz VS; Kerlikowske K; Vachon CM
Radiology; 2016 Jun; 279(3):710-9. PubMed ID: 26694052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Volumetric breast density is essential for predicting cosmetic outcome at the late stage after breast-conserving surgery.
Shiina N; Sakakibara M; Fujisaki K; Iwase T; Nagashima T; Sangai T; Kubota Y; Akita S; Takishima H; Miyazaki M
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Apr; 42(4):481-8. PubMed ID: 26852107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. A comparison of five methods of measuring mammographic density: a case-control study.
Astley SM; Harkness EF; Sergeant JC; Warwick J; Stavrinos P; Warren R; Wilson M; Beetles U; Gadde S; Lim Y; Jain A; Bundred S; Barr N; Reece V; Brentnall AR; Cuzick J; Howell T; Evans DG
Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Feb; 20(1):10. PubMed ID: 29402289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. The combined effect of mammographic texture and density on breast cancer risk: a cohort study.
Wanders JOP; van Gils CH; Karssemeijer N; Holland K; Kallenberg M; Peeters PHM; Nielsen M; Lillholm M
Breast Cancer Res; 2018 May; 20(1):36. PubMed ID: 29720220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Investigating the feasibility of stratified breast cancer screening using a masking risk predictor.
Alonzo-Proulx O; Mainprize JG; Harvey JA; Yaffe MJ
Breast Cancer Res; 2019 Aug; 21(1):91. PubMed ID: 31399056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Automated volumetric breast density measures: differential change between breasts in women with and without breast cancer.
Brandt KR; Scott CG; Miglioretti DL; Jensen MR; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Hruska C; Ma L; Wu FF; Cummings SR; Norman AD; Engmann NJ; Shepherd JA; Winham SJ; Kerlikowske K; Vachon CM
Breast Cancer Res; 2019 Oct; 21(1):118. PubMed ID: 31660981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Medication use and mammographic breast density.
Han Y; Lee CT; Xu S; Mi X; Phillip CR; Salazar AS; Rakhmankulova M; Toriola AT
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2021 Sep; 189(2):585-592. PubMed ID: 34196899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Breast density measured volumetrically in a clinical environment: cross-sectional study with photon counting technology.
Browne JL; Casas L; Santandreu G; Rodriguez I; Navarro B; Tresserra F; Pascual MA
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Feb; 179(3):755-762. PubMed ID: 31776828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Comparison of Visual Assessment of Breast Density in BI-RADS 4th and 5th Editions With Automated Volumetric Measurement.
Youk JH; Kim SJ; Son EJ; Gweon HM; Kim JA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Sep; 209(3):703-708. PubMed ID: 28657850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Mammographic density estimation with automated volumetric breast density measurement.
Ko SY; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Moon HJ
Korean J Radiol; 2014; 15(3):313-21. PubMed ID: 24843235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Comparison of a Deep Learning Risk Score and Standard Mammographic Density Score for Breast Cancer Risk Prediction.
Dembrower K; Liu Y; Azizpour H; Eklund M; Smith K; Lindholm P; Strand F
Radiology; 2020 Feb; 294(2):265-272. PubMed ID: 31845842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. A novel method of determining breast cancer risk using parenchymal textural analysis of mammography images on an Asian cohort.
Tan M; Mariapun S; Yip CH; Ng KH; Teo SH
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jan; 64(3):035016. PubMed ID: 30577031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Left-right breast asymmetry and risk of screen-detected and interval cancers in a large population-based screening population.
Hudson SM; Wilkinson LS; De Stavola BL; Dos-Santos-Silva I
Br J Radiol; 2020 Aug; 93(1112):20200154. PubMed ID: 32525693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Breast Density Estimation with Fully Automated Volumetric Method: Comparison to Radiologists' Assessment by BI-RADS Categories.
Singh T; Sharma M; Singla V; Khandelwal N
Acad Radiol; 2016 Jan; 23(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 26521687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Mammographic breast density and breast cancer risk: Evaluation using volumetric breast density software.
Koshi S; Singla V; Singh T; Prabhakar N; Bal A; Singh G
J Cancer Res Ther; 2020; 16(6):1258-1264. PubMed ID: 33342781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
