These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35914369)

  • 1. Assessing the utility of quantitative and qualitative metrics in the DNA quantification process of skeletal remains for autosomal and Y-chromosome STR amplification purposes.
    Doniec A; Januła M; Grzmil P; Kupiec T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Sep; 60():102751. PubMed ID: 35914369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction of autosomal STR typing success in ancient and Second World War bone samples.
    Zupanič Pajnič I; Zupanc T; Balažic J; Geršak ŽM; Stojković O; Skadrić I; Črešnar M
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Mar; 27():17-26. PubMed ID: 27907810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance comparison of four qPCR and three autosomal STR commercial kits from degraded skeletal remains.
    Haarkötter C; Saiz M; Gálvez X; Vinueza-Espinosa DC; Medina-Lozano MI; Lorente JA; Álvarez JC
    Forensic Sci Int; 2023 Dec; 353():111856. PubMed ID: 37863006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of four commercial quantitative real-time PCR kits with inhibited and degraded samples.
    Holmes AS; Houston R; Elwick K; Gangitano D; Hughes-Stamm S
    Int J Legal Med; 2018 May; 132(3):691-701. PubMed ID: 29177703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing the performance of quantity and quality metrics using the QIAGEN Investigator® Quantiplex® pro RGQ kit.
    Morrison J; McColl S; Louhelainen J; Sheppard K; May A; Girdland-Flink L; Watts G; Dawnay N
    Sci Justice; 2020 Jul; 60(4):388-397. PubMed ID: 32650941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The performance of quality controls in the Investigator® Quantiplex® Pro RGQ and Investigator® 24plex STR kits with a variety of forensic samples.
    Harrel M; Mayes C; Houston R; Holmes AS; Gutierrez R; Hughes S
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Nov; 55():102586. PubMed ID: 34530399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improved Y-STR typing for disaster victim identification, missing persons investigations, and historical human skeletal remains.
    Ambers A; Votrubova J; Vanek D; Sajantila A; Budowle B
    Int J Legal Med; 2018 Nov; 132(6):1545-1553. PubMed ID: 29476237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A performance study on three qPCR quantification kits and their compatibilities with the 6-dye DNA profiling systems.
    Lin SW; Li C; Ip SCY
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Mar; 33():72-83. PubMed ID: 29202296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. QIAGEN's Investigator
    Bonnette MD
    Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2685():189-204. PubMed ID: 37439983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Qiagen's Investigator™ Quantiplex Kit as a predictor of STR amplification success from low-yield DNA samples.
    Thomas JT; Berlin RM; Barker JM; Dawson Cruz T
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Sep; 58(5):1306-1309. PubMed ID: 23786239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantitative and qualitative study of STR DNA from ethanol and formalin fixed tissues.
    Alqaydi M; Roy R
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 May; 262():18-29. PubMed ID: 26963697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of DNA yield and STR success rates from different tissues in embalmed bodies.
    Wheeler A; Czado N; Gangitano D; Turnbough M; Hughes-Stamm S
    Int J Legal Med; 2017 Jan; 131(1):61-66. PubMed ID: 27338932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of autosomal and male DNA extracted from casework samples using Casework Direct Kit, Custom and Maxwell 16 System DNA IQ Casework Pro Kit for autosomal-STR and Y-STR profiling.
    Hakim HM; Khan HO; Ismail SA; Ayob S; Lalung J; Kofi EA; Chambers GK; Edinur HA
    Sci Rep; 2019 Oct; 9(1):14558. PubMed ID: 31601905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Comparison Among Three Multiplex Y-STR Profiling Kits for Sexual Assault Cases.
    Ferreira-Silva B; Fonseca-Cardoso M; Porto MJ; Magalhães T; Cainé L
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Nov; 63(6):1836-1840. PubMed ID: 29464703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Strategy for STR typing of bones from the Second World War combining CE and NGS technology: A pilot study.
    Zupanič Pajnič I; Fattorini P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Jan; 50():102401. PubMed ID: 33171316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative PCR overestimation of DNA in samples contaminated with tin.
    Bonsu DNO; Higgins D; Simon C; Goodwin CS; Henry JM; Austin JJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2023 Jul; 68(4):1302-1309. PubMed ID: 37326229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neither femur nor tooth: Petrous bone for identifying archaeological bone samples via forensic approach.
    Pilli E; Vai S; Caruso MG; D'Errico G; Berti A; Caramelli D
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Feb; 283():144-149. PubMed ID: 29301114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Utility of the Ion S5™ and MiSeq FGx™ sequencing platforms to characterize challenging human remains.
    Elwick K; Bus MM; King JL; Chang J; Hughes-Stamm S; Budowle B
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2019 Nov; 41():101623. PubMed ID: 31499459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Quantifiler(®) Trio and InnoQuant™ human DNA quantification kits for detection of DNA degradation in developed and aged fingerprints.
    Goecker ZC; Swiontek SE; Lakhtakia A; Roy R
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Jun; 263():132-138. PubMed ID: 27107968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identifying victims of the largest Second World War family massacre in Slovenia.
    Zupanič Pajnič I; Obal M; Zupanc T
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Jan; 306():110056. PubMed ID: 31765883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.