These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35915416)

  • 1. Correction: Shaping the right conditions in programmatic assessment: how quality of narrative information affects the quality of high-stakes decision-making.
    de Jong LH; Bok HGJ; Schellekens LH; Kremer WDJ; Jonker FH; van der Vleuten CPM
    BMC Med Educ; 2022 Aug; 22(1):592. PubMed ID: 35915416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Shaping the right conditions in programmatic assessment: how quality of narrative information affects the quality of high-stakes decision-making.
    de Jong LH; Bok HGJ; Schellekens LH; Kremer WDJ; Jonker FH; van der Vleuten CPM
    BMC Med Educ; 2022 May; 22(1):409. PubMed ID: 35643442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stakes in the eye of the beholder: an international study of learners' perceptions within programmatic assessment.
    Schut S; Driessen E; van Tartwijk J; van der Vleuten C; Heeneman S
    Med Educ; 2018 Jun; 52(6):654-663. PubMed ID: 29572920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Twelve Tips for programmatic assessment.
    Van Der Vleuten CPM; Schuwirth LWT; Driessen EW; Govaerts MJB; Heeneman S
    Med Teach; 2015 Jul; 37(7):641-646. PubMed ID: 25410481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Incorporating aspects of programmatic assessment into examinations: Aggregating rich information to inform decision-making.
    Pearce J; Reid K; Chiavaroli N; Hyam D
    Med Teach; 2021 May; 43(5):567-574. PubMed ID: 33556294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Student progress decision-making in programmatic assessment: can we extrapolate from clinical decision-making and jury decision-making?
    Tweed M; Wilkinson T
    BMC Med Educ; 2019 May; 19(1):176. PubMed ID: 31146714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Competency-based education calls for programmatic assessment: But what does this look like in practice?
    Rich JV; Fostaty Young S; Donnelly C; Hall AK; Dagnone JD; Weersink K; Caudle J; Van Melle E; Klinger DA
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2020 Aug; 26(4):1087-1095. PubMed ID: 31820556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Frontal, Striatal, and Medial Temporal Sensitivity to Value Distinguishes Risk-Taking from Risk-Aversive Older Adults during Decision Making.
    Goh JO; Su YS; Tang YJ; McCarrey AC; Tereshchenko A; Elkins W; Resnick SM
    J Neurosci; 2016 Dec; 36(49):12498-12509. PubMed ID: 27927964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. "Prevention Is Better Than Cure": A Plea to Emphasize the Learning Function of Competence Committees in Programmatic Assessment.
    Bok HGJ; van der Vleuten CPM; de Jong LH
    Front Vet Sci; 2021; 8():638455. PubMed ID: 33996968
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A practical approach to programmatic assessment design.
    Timmerman AA; Dijkstra J
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2017 Dec; 22(5):1169-1182. PubMed ID: 28120259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Programmatic assessment: Can we provide evidence for saturation of information?
    de Jong LH; Bok HGJ; Kremer WDJ; van der Vleuten CPM
    Med Teach; 2019 Jun; 41(6):678-682. PubMed ID: 30707848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating interest in narrative therapy for decision making about pectus excavatum treatment.
    Ticchi D; Eisinger RS; Pilegaard HK; Torre M; Sesia SB; Infante M; Voulaz E; Quesada MA; Sisask M
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2018 Feb; 26(2):271-275. PubMed ID: 29049840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does narrative information bias individual's decision making? A systematic review.
    Winterbottom A; Bekker HL; Conner M; Mooney A
    Soc Sci Med; 2008 Dec; 67(12):2079-88. PubMed ID: 18951673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Shadow systems in assessment: how supervisors make progress decisions in practice.
    Castanelli DJ; Weller JM; Molloy E; Bearman M
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2020 Mar; 25(1):131-147. PubMed ID: 31485893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. High-Stakes Decision-Making Within Complex Social Environments: A Computational Model of Belief Systems in the Arab Spring.
    Dornschneider S
    Cogn Sci; 2019 Jul; 43(7):e12762. PubMed ID: 31310025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Key considerations in planning and designing programmatic assessment in competency-based medical education.
    Ross S; Hauer KE; Wycliffe-Jones K; Hall AK; Molgaard L; Richardson D; Oswald A; Bhanji F;
    Med Teach; 2021 Jul; 43(7):758-764. PubMed ID: 34061700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A preliminary analysis of high-stakes decision-making for crisis leadership.
    Oroszi T
    J Bus Contin Emer Plan; 2018 Jan; 11(4):335-59. PubMed ID: 30670135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Discussing Prognosis and Shared Decision-Making.
    Sommovilla J; Kopecky KE; Campbell T
    Surg Clin North Am; 2019 Oct; 99(5):849-858. PubMed ID: 31446913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Decision Making for Infants With Neurologic Conditions.
    Gerrity C; Farley S; Barks MC; Ubel PA; Brandon D; Pollak KI; Lemmon ME
    J Child Neurol; 2022 Mar; 37(3):202-209. PubMed ID: 35133902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tool-supported Interactive Correction and Semantic Annotation of Narrative Clinical Reports.
    Zvára K; Tomečková M; Peleška J; Svátek V; Zvárová J
    Methods Inf Med; 2017 May; 56(3):217-229. PubMed ID: 28451691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.