These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35915416)

  • 21. Entrustment Unpacked: Aligning Purposes, Stakes, and Processes to Enhance Learner Assessment.
    Kinnear B; Warm EJ; Caretta-Weyer H; Holmboe ES; Turner DA; van der Vleuten C; Schumacher DJ
    Acad Med; 2021 Jul; 96(7S):S56-S63. PubMed ID: 34183603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A preliminary analysis of high-stakes decision-making for crisis leadership.
    Oroszi T
    J Bus Contin Emer Plan; 2018 Jan; 11(4):335-59. PubMed ID: 30670135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Discussing Prognosis and Shared Decision-Making.
    Sommovilla J; Kopecky KE; Campbell T
    Surg Clin North Am; 2019 Oct; 99(5):849-858. PubMed ID: 31446913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Decision Making for Infants With Neurologic Conditions.
    Gerrity C; Farley S; Barks MC; Ubel PA; Brandon D; Pollak KI; Lemmon ME
    J Child Neurol; 2022 Mar; 37(3):202-209. PubMed ID: 35133902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Tool-supported Interactive Correction and Semantic Annotation of Narrative Clinical Reports.
    Zvára K; Tomečková M; Peleška J; Svátek V; Zvárová J
    Methods Inf Med; 2017 May; 56(3):217-229. PubMed ID: 28451691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The conceptualisation of health-related quality of life in decision-making by intensive care physicians: A qualitative inquiry.
    Haines DKJ; Remedios L; Berney SC; Knott DC; Denehy L
    Aust Crit Care; 2017 May; 30(3):152-159. PubMed ID: 27595412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Narrative medicine and decision-making capacity.
    Mahr G
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2015 Jun; 21(3):503-7. PubMed ID: 25879153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Understanding the influence of teacher-learner relationships on learners' assessment perception.
    Schut S; van Tartwijk J; Driessen E; van der Vleuten C; Heeneman S
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2020 May; 25(2):441-456. PubMed ID: 31664546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Ottawa 2020 consensus statement for programmatic assessment - 1. Agreement on the principles.
    Heeneman S; de Jong LH; Dawson LJ; Wilkinson TJ; Ryan A; Tait GR; Rice N; Torre D; Freeman A; van der Vleuten CPM
    Med Teach; 2021 Oct; 43(10):1139-1148. PubMed ID: 34344274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. High-stakes examinations during the COVID-19 pandemic: to proceed or not to proceed, that is the question.
    Tan CK; Chua WL; Vu CK; Chang JP
    Postgrad Med J; 2021 Jul; 97(1149):427-431. PubMed ID: 33452144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Politics in evaluation: Politically responsive evaluation in high stakes environments.
    Azzam T; Levine B
    Eval Program Plann; 2015 Dec; 53():44-56. PubMed ID: 26283476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Do personal stories make patient decision aids more effective? A critical review of theory and evidence.
    Bekker HL; Winterbottom AE; Butow P; Dillard AJ; Feldman-Stewart D; Fowler FJ; Jibaja-Weiss ML; Shaffer VA; Volk RJ
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2013; 13 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S9. PubMed ID: 24625283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Deconstructing programmatic assessment.
    Wilkinson TJ; Tweed MJ
    Adv Med Educ Pract; 2018; 9():191-197. PubMed ID: 29606896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Narrative Interest Standard: A Novel Approach to Surrogate Decision-Making for People With Dementia.
    Wilkins JM
    Gerontologist; 2018 Nov; 58(6):1016-1020. PubMed ID: 29617766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A Framework to Improve Surgeon Communication in High-Stakes Surgical Decisions: Best Case/Worst Case.
    Taylor LJ; Nabozny MJ; Steffens NM; Tucholka JL; Brasel KJ; Johnson SK; Zelenski A; Rathouz PJ; Zhao Q; Kwekkeboom KL; Campbell TC; Schwarze ML
    JAMA Surg; 2017 Jun; 152(6):531-538. PubMed ID: 28146230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. On the issue of costs in programmatic assessment.
    van der Vleuten CP; Heeneman S
    Perspect Med Educ; 2016 Oct; 5(5):303-7. PubMed ID: 27638392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The validity and reliability of clinical judgement and decision-making skills assessment in nursing: A systematic literature review.
    Clemett VJ; Raleigh M
    Nurse Educ Today; 2021 Jul; 102():104885. PubMed ID: 33894591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The potential use of Bayesian Networks to support committee decisions in programmatic assessment.
    Zoanetti N; Pearce J
    Med Educ; 2021 Jul; 55(7):808-817. PubMed ID: 33151589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Rehabilitation students' attitudes toward persons with disabilities in high- and low-stakes social contexts: A conjoint analysis.
    Rosenthal DA; Chan F; Livneh H
    Disabil Rehabil; 2006 Dec; 28(24):1517-27. PubMed ID: 17178615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Stakes, aims and specificities of the physician-patient communication in cancer care: state of the art and perspectives].
    Libert Y; Merckaert I; Reynaert C; Razavi D
    Bull Cancer; 2006 Apr; 93(4):357-62. PubMed ID: 16627240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.