225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35916103)
21. Atypical architectural distortion detection in digital breast tomosynthesis: a multi-view computer-aided detection model with ipsilateral learning.
Pan J; He Z; Li Y; Zeng W; Guo Y; Jia L; Jiang H; Chen W; Lu Y
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Nov; 68(23):. PubMed ID: 37918341
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: integration of image modalities enhances deep learning-based breast mass classification.
Li X; Qin G; He Q; Sun L; Zeng H; He Z; Chen W; Zhen X; Zhou L
Eur Radiol; 2020 Feb; 30(2):778-788. PubMed ID: 31691121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Deformable mapping technique to correlate lesions in digital breast tomosynthesis and automated breast ultrasound images.
Green CA; Goodsitt MM; Brock KK; Davis CL; Larson ED; Lau JH; Carson PL
Med Phys; 2018 Oct; 45(10):4402-4417. PubMed ID: 30066340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Association between Breast Parenchymal Complexity and False-Positive Recall From Digital Mammography Versus Breast Tomosynthesis: Preliminary Investigation in the ACRIN PA 4006 Trial.
Ray S; Chen L; Keller BM; Chen J; Conant EF; Kontos D
Acad Radiol; 2016 Aug; 23(8):977-86. PubMed ID: 27236612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Mass detection in digital breast tomosynthesis data using convolutional neural networks and multiple instance learning.
Yousefi M; Krzyżak A; Suen CY
Comput Biol Med; 2018 May; 96():283-293. PubMed ID: 29665537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Mutual information-based template matching scheme for detection of breast masses: from mammography to digital breast tomosynthesis.
Mazurowski MA; Lo JY; Harrawood BP; Tourassi GD
J Biomed Inform; 2011 Oct; 44(5):815-23. PubMed ID: 21554985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Deep learning denoising of digital breast tomosynthesis: Observer performance study of the effect on detection of microcalcifications in breast phantom images.
Chan HP; Helvie MA; Gao M; Hadjiiski L; Zhou C; Garver K; Klein KA; McLaughlin C; Oudsema R; Rahman WT; Roubidoux MA
Med Phys; 2023 Oct; 50(10):6177-6189. PubMed ID: 37145996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Computer aided detection of clusters of microcalcifications on full field digital mammograms.
Ge J; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Chan HP; Wei J; Helvie MA; Zhou C
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2975-88. PubMed ID: 16964876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Improving image quality for digital breast tomosynthesis: an automated detection and diffusion-based method for metal artifact reduction.
Lu Y; Chan HP; Wei J; Hadjiiski LM; Samala RK
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(19):7765-7783. PubMed ID: 28832336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. 3D Context-Aware Convolutional Neural Network for False Positive Reduction in Clustered Microcalcifications Detection.
Zheng J; Sun H; Wu S; Jiang K; Peng Y; Yang X; Zhang F; Li M
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2021 Mar; 25(3):764-773. PubMed ID: 32750942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Impact of artificial intelligence support on accuracy and reading time in breast tomosynthesis image interpretation: a multi-reader multi-case study.
van Winkel SL; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; Appelman L; Gubern-Mérida A; Karssemeijer N; Teuwen J; Wanders AJT; Sechopoulos I; Mann RM
Eur Radiol; 2021 Nov; 31(11):8682-8691. PubMed ID: 33948701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Avoiding Tissue Overlap in 2D Images: Single-Slice DBT Classification Using Convolutional Neural Networks.
Mendes J; Matela N; Garcia N
Tomography; 2023 Feb; 9(1):398-412. PubMed ID: 36828384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A deep learning classifier for digital breast tomosynthesis.
Ricciardi R; Mettivier G; Staffa M; Sarno A; Acampora G; Minelli S; Santoro A; Antignani E; Orientale A; Pilotti IAM; Santangelo V; D'Andria P; Russo P
Phys Med; 2021 Mar; 83():184-193. PubMed ID: 33798904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.
Seo N; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Kim H; Moon JH; Gong G; Ahn SH; Son BH
Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 24005560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Fully automated nipple detection in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Chae SH; Jeong JW; Choi JH; Chae EY; Kim HH; Choi YW; Lee S
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 May; 143():113-120. PubMed ID: 28391808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Impact of AI for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis on Breast Cancer Detection and Interpretation Time.
Park EK; Kwak S; Lee W; Choi JS; Kooi T; Kim EK
Radiol Artif Intell; 2024 May; 6(3):e230318. PubMed ID: 38568095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Impact of prior mammograms on combined reading of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.
Kim WH; Chang JM; Koo HR; Seo M; Bae MS; Lee J; Moon WK
Acta Radiol; 2017 Feb; 58(2):148-155. PubMed ID: 27178032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Diagnostic value of digital breast tomosynthesis and synthetic images in patients with breast cancer.
Bahadir H
Niger J Clin Pract; 2023 Oct; 26(10):1444-1448. PubMed ID: 37929519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced digital mammography in breast cancer detection in comparison to tomosynthesis, synthetic 2D mammography and tomosynthesis combined with ultrasound in women with dense breast.
Sudhir R; Sannapareddy K; Potlapalli A; Krishnamurthy PB; Buddha S; Koppula V
Br J Radiol; 2021 Feb; 94(1118):20201046. PubMed ID: 33242249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. AI-based Strategies to Reduce Workload in Breast Cancer Screening with Mammography and Tomosynthesis: A Retrospective Evaluation.
Raya-Povedano JL; Romero-Martín S; Elías-Cabot E; Gubern-Mérida A; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; Álvarez-Benito M
Radiology; 2021 Jul; 300(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 33944627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
