These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35916465)
1. Quality of information provided by Brazilian Fertility Clinic websites: Compliance with Brazilian Medical Council (CFM) and American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) Guidelines. Carneiro MM; Koga CN; Mussi MCL; Fradico PF; Ferreira MCF JBRA Assist Reprod; 2023 Jun; 27(2):169-173. PubMed ID: 35916465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of United States fertility clinic websites according to the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM)/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) guidelines. Abusief ME; Hornstein MD; Jain T; ; Fertil Steril; 2007 Jan; 87(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 17081534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reporting assisted reproductive technology success rates on Australian and New Zealand fertility clinic websites. Goodman LK; Prentice LR; Chanati R; Farquhar C Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Feb; 60(1):135-140. PubMed ID: 32052410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology advertising guidelines: How are member clinics doing? Sauerbrun-Cutler MT; Brown EC; Huber WJ; Has P; Frishman GN Fertil Steril; 2021 Jan; 115(1):104-109. PubMed ID: 33069369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What is the quality of information on social oocyte cryopreservation provided by websites of Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology member fertility clinics? Avraham S; Machtinger R; Cahan T; Sokolov A; Racowsky C; Seidman DS Fertil Steril; 2014 Jan; 101(1):222-6. PubMed ID: 24140039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Direct-to-consumer advertising of success rates for medically assisted reproduction: a review of national clinic websites. Wilkinson J; Vail A; Roberts SA BMJ Open; 2017 Jan; 7(1):e012218. PubMed ID: 28082363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. "Add-Ons" for Assisted Reproductive Technology: Do Patients Get Honest Information from Fertility Clinics' Websites? Galiano V; Orvieto R; Machtinger R; Nahum R; Garzia E; Sulpizio P; Marconi AM; Seidman D Reprod Sci; 2021 Dec; 28(12):3466-3472. PubMed ID: 33939166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of Turkey IVF (In Vitro Fertilization) websites according to the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM)/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) guidelines. Calik KY; Bulut HK J Pak Med Assoc; 2020 Mar; 70(3):421-426. PubMed ID: 32207418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The prevalence, promotion and pricing of three IVF add-ons on fertility clinic websites. van de Wiel L; Wilkinson J; Athanasiou P; Harper J Reprod Biomed Online; 2020 Nov; 41(5):801-806. PubMed ID: 32888824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Recruiting egg donors online: an analysis of in vitro fertilization clinic and agency websites' adherence to American Society for Reproductive Medicine guidelines. Keehn J; Holwell E; Abdul-Karim R; Chin LJ; Leu CS; Sauer MV; Klitzman R Fertil Steril; 2012 Oct; 98(4):995-1000. PubMed ID: 22840240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An assessment of oncofertility content on reproductive endocrinology and infertility clinic websites. Mujumdar V; Shivashankar K; Madding R; Levy AT; Gordhandas S; Rosenblum NG; Richard S; Monseur B J Assist Reprod Genet; 2022 Apr; 39(4):957-962. PubMed ID: 35217946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How compliant are in vitro fertilization member clinics in following embryo transfer guidelines? An analysis of 59,689 fresh first in vitro fertilization autologous cycles from 2011 to 2012. Keyhan S; Acharya KS; Acharya CR; Yeh JS; Provost MP; Goldfarb JM; Muasher SJ Fertil Steril; 2016 Sep; 106(3):645-652.e1. PubMed ID: 27268276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro fertilization and multiple pregnancies: an evidence-based analysis. Medical Advisory Secretariat Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2006; 6(18):1-63. PubMed ID: 23074488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. We are here for you: infertility clinic communication during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Mehr H; Jackson-Bey T; Vu M; Lee V; Herndon C; Ho J; Aghajanova L; Quinn MM J Assist Reprod Genet; 2021 Jul; 38(7):1809-1817. PubMed ID: 33866478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of compliance and range of fees among American Society for Reproductive Medicine-listed egg donor and surrogacy agencies. Luk J; Petrozza JC J Reprod Med; 2008 Nov; 53(11):847-52. PubMed ID: 19097517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The ART of social networking: how SART member clinics are connecting with patients online. Omurtag K; Jimenez PT; Ratts V; Odem R; Cooper AR Fertil Steril; 2012 Jan; 97(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 22088209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assisted reproductive technology practice patterns and the impact of embryo transfer guidelines in the United States. Stern JE; Cedars MI; Jain T; Klein NA; Beaird CM; Grainger DA; Gibbons WE; Fertil Steril; 2007 Aug; 88(2):275-82. PubMed ID: 17445805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]