BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3591650)

  • 1. Comparison of dust samplers: statistical analysis techniques.
    Knight G; Moore E
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1987 Apr; 48(4):344-53. PubMed ID: 3591650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of respirable dust samplers for use in hard rock mines.
    Knight G; Moore E
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1987 Apr; 48(4):354-63. PubMed ID: 3591651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating heterogeneity in indoor and outdoor air pollution using land-use regression and constrained factor analysis.
    Levy JI; Clougherty JE; Baxter LK; Houseman EA; Paciorek CJ;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2010 Dec; (152):5-80; discussion 81-91. PubMed ID: 21409949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Field comparison of inhalable and total dust samplers for assessing airborne dust in swine confinement barns.
    Predicala BZ; Maghirang RG
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2003 Sep; 18(9):694-701. PubMed ID: 12909537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Application of visible, near-infrared, and short-wave infrared (400-2500 nm) reflectance spectroscopy in quantitatively assessing settled dust in the indoor environment. Case study in dwellings and office environments.
    Chudnovsky A; Ben-Dor E
    Sci Total Environ; 2008 Apr; 393(2-3):198-213. PubMed ID: 18262224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measuring dust on skin with a small vacuuming sampler--a comparison with other sampling techniques.
    Lundgren L; Skare L; Lidén C
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Jan; 50(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 16216826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electron microscopic evaluation of atmospheric dust.
    Friedrichs KH
    Med Lav; 1989; 80(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 2755385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative assessment of dust propagation at a hazardous waste landfill: directional monitoring with elemental analysis.
    Fowler M; Datson H; Newberry J
    J Environ Monit; 2010 Apr; 12(4):879-89. PubMed ID: 20383369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Imputation of data values that are less than a detection limit.
    Succop PA; Clark S; Chen M; Galke W
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2004 Jul; 1(7):436-41. PubMed ID: 15238313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation and field calibration of the Miniram PDM-3 aerosol monitor for measuring respirable and total coal dust.
    Middendorf PJ; Lehocky AH; Williams PL
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1999; 60(4):502-11. PubMed ID: 10462784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Occupational exposure to cotton dust in cottonseed oil mills.
    Tabak S; Broday DM; Tabak I; Manor G
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2002 Feb; 17(2):121-30. PubMed ID: 11843198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sampling of high amounts of bioaerosols using a high-volume electrostatic field sampler.
    Madsen AM; Sharma AK
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2008 Apr; 52(3):167-76. PubMed ID: 18326871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Weighing precision of filters used in dust measurements: repeatability and reproducibility].
    Stroszejn-Mrowca G; Mikołajczyk U
    Med Pr; 2006; 57(3):257-62. PubMed ID: 17125032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Comparison of breathing and different methods of dust collection].
    Dahmann D; yang L; Wang ZL
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2003 Aug; 21(4):297-8. PubMed ID: 14761457
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of four methods to assess fungal alpha-amylase in flour dust.
    Lillienberg L; Baur X; Doekes G; Belin L; Raulf-Heimsoth M; Sander I; Ståhl A; Thissen J; Heederik D
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2000 Sep; 44(6):427-33. PubMed ID: 10963707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lead dustfall from demolition of scattered site family housing: developing a sampling methodology.
    Mucha AP; Stites N; Evens A; MacRoy PM; Persky VW; Jacobs DE
    Environ Res; 2009 Feb; 109(2):143-8. PubMed ID: 19105996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A field comparison of inhalable and thoracic size selective sampling techniques.
    Davies HW; Teschke K; Demers PA
    Ann Occup Hyg; 1999 Aug; 43(6):381-92. PubMed ID: 10518464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Field evaluation of nanofilm detectors for measuring acidic particles in indoor and outdoor air.
    Cohen BS; Heikkinen MS; Hazi Y; Gao H; Peters P; Lippmann M
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2004 Sep; (121):1-35; discussion 37-46. PubMed ID: 15553489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
    Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variations in exposure to inhalable wood dust in the Danish furniture industry. Within- and between-worker and factory components estimated from passive dust sampling.
    Vinzents PS; Schlünssen V; Feveile H; Schaumburg I
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2001 Oct; 45(7):603-8. PubMed ID: 11583662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.