These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35917137)
1. Long- and Short-Term Variability of Perimetry in Glaucoma. Gardiner SK; Swanson WH; Mansberger SL Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2022 Aug; 11(8):3. PubMed ID: 35917137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Differences in the Relation Between Perimetric Sensitivity and Variability Between Locations Across the Visual Field. Gardiner SK Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2018 Jul; 59(8):3667-3674. PubMed ID: 30029253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of the reliability of standard automated perimetry in regions of glaucomatous damage. Gardiner SK; Swanson WH; Goren D; Mansberger SL; Demirel S Ophthalmology; 2014 Jul; 121(7):1359-69. PubMed ID: 24629617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of long-term variability for standard and short-wavelength automated perimetry in stable glaucoma patients. Blumenthal EZ; Sample PA; Zangwill L; Lee AC; Kono Y; Weinreb RN Am J Ophthalmol; 2000 Mar; 129(3):309-13. PubMed ID: 10704545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma. Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of Restricting Perimetry Testing Algorithms to Reliable Sensitivities on Test-Retest Variability. Gardiner SK; Mansberger SL Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 Oct; 57(13):5631-5636. PubMed ID: 27784065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of Goldmann III, V and spatially equated test stimuli in visual field testing: the importance of complete and partial spatial summation. Phu J; Khuu SK; Zangerl B; Kalloniatis M Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Mar; 37(2):160-176. PubMed ID: 28211185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of a variability-adjusted algorithm on the efficiency of perimetric testing. Gardiner SK Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 May; 55(5):2983-92. PubMed ID: 24713484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Variability in patients with glaucomatous visual field damage is reduced using size V stimuli. Wall M; Kutzko KE; Chauhan BC Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Feb; 38(2):426-35. PubMed ID: 9040476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of Criterion Bias on Perimetric Sensitivity and Response Variability in Glaucoma. Rubinstein NJ; Turpin A; Denniss J; McKendrick AM Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2021 Jan; 10(1):18. PubMed ID: 33510957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from Full Threshold, SITA Standard, and SITA Fast strategies. Artes PH; Iwase A; Ohno Y; Kitazawa Y; Chauhan BC Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Aug; 43(8):2654-9. PubMed ID: 12147599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Spatiotemporal Summation of Perimetric Stimuli in Early Glaucoma. Mulholland PJ; Redmond T; Garway-Heath DF; Zlatkova MB; Anderson RS Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Oct; 56(11):6473-82. PubMed ID: 26447981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Moving Stimulus Perimetry: A New Functional Test for Glaucoma. Gardiner SK; Mansberger SL Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2022 Oct; 11(10):9. PubMed ID: 36201198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Longitudinal Signal-to-Noise Ratio of Perimetry at Different Severities of Glaucoma. Gardiner SK Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2023 Feb; 12(2):30. PubMed ID: 36811884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Within-test variability of frequency-doubling perimetry using a 24-2 test pattern. Spry PG; Johnson CA J Glaucoma; 2002 Aug; 11(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 12169968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A new pattern electroretinogram paradigm evaluated in terms of user friendliness and agreement with perimetry. Yang A; Swanson WH Ophthalmology; 2007 Apr; 114(4):671-9. PubMed ID: 17398319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Standard Automated Perimetry: Determining Spatial Summation and Its Effect on Contrast Sensitivity Across the Visual Field. Khuu SK; Kalloniatis M Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Jun; 56(6):3565-76. PubMed ID: 26047043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Test-Retest Variability of Fundus-Tracked Perimetry at the Peripapillary Region in Open Angle Glaucoma. Wu Z; McKendrick AM; Hadoux X; Gaskin JC; Ang GS; Sarossy MG; Crowston JG Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 Jul; 57(8):3619-25. PubMed ID: 27391552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Threshold Automated Perimetry of the Full Visual Field in Patients With Glaucoma With Mild Visual Loss. Wall M; Lee EJ; Wanzek RJ; Zamba KD; Turpin A; Chong LX; Marin-Franch I J Glaucoma; 2019 Nov; 28(11):997-1005. PubMed ID: 31567907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Short- And Long-Term Variability in Standard Perimetry and Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography in Glaucoma. Urata CN; Mariottoni EB; Jammal AA; Ogata NG; Thompson AC; Berchuck SI; Estrela T; Medeiros FA Am J Ophthalmol; 2020 Feb; 210():19-25. PubMed ID: 31715158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]