These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3591810)

  • 1. Comment on Kartell v. Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Inc.: an antitrust analysis of Blue Shield's reimbursement schemes.
    Wayne AB
    Am J Law Med; 1986; 11(4):465-500. PubMed ID: 3591810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Blue Shield's ban on balance billing found an "unreasonable restraint on competition".
    Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1984 Aug; 39(2):97-8. PubMed ID: 10278262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vertical restraints among hospitals, physicians and health insurers that raise rivals' costs. A case study of Reazin v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc. and Ocean State Physicians Health Plan, Inc. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Rhode Island.
    Baker JB
    Am J Law Med; 1988; 14(2-3):147-69. PubMed ID: 3245541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost containment in the health care field and the antitrust laws.
    Shapiro DI
    Am J Law Med; 1982; 7(4):425-35. PubMed ID: 7102679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Examining exclusionary conduct of HMOs and PPOs: a case comment on Northwest Medical Laboratories v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Oregon.
    Levitt DM
    Am J Law Med; 1991; 17(3):271-88. PubMed ID: 1785621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. FTC charges MDs control Blue Shield.
    Am Med News; 1979 May; 22(20):2. PubMed ID: 10242441
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minimizing antitrust risks of Blue Cross and Blue Shield plans.
    Steele CJ
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1988; 4():227-72. PubMed ID: 10288422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ball Memorial Hospital: Section 2 Sherman Act analysis in the alternative health care delivery market.
    Kirsch T
    Am J Law Med; 1988; 14(2-3):249-79. PubMed ID: 3072878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. U.S. District Court finds Blue Shield physician payment method violates Sec. 1 of the Sherman Act.
    Laurence K; Kinney ED
    Health Law Vigil; 1984 Mar; 7(7):4-7. PubMed ID: 10278231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can Blue Shield offer data processing services to doctors, in competition with commercial data processing services?
    Morse HN
    Med Electron; 1985 Apr; 16(2):12. PubMed ID: 10271578
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Blue Cross/Blue Shield's PROBE information reporting system.
    Sandrick KM
    QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1983 Sep; 9(9):272-4. PubMed ID: 6415570
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Insurance Bureau, the Blues and the prospective reimbursement system.
    Cohn A
    Mich Hosp; 1978 Aug; 14(8):8-11. PubMed ID: 10308444
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Court decisions give Blues plans one win, one loss in separate antitrust cases.
    Halper HR; Kazon PM
    Bus Health; 1987 Mar; 4(5):51-2. PubMed ID: 10280673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Federal District Court refuses to apply "per se" rule in antitrust challenge to third party reimbursement policies.
    O'Brien JP
    Health Law Vigil; 1982 Aug; 5(17):6-8. PubMed ID: 10256277
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Doctors vs. Blue Shield: the first big battle.
    Enright SB
    Med Econ; 1978 Nov; 55(25):23, 27-9, 32. PubMed ID: 10239446
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Federal judge says Blue Shield of Virginia justified in limiting reimbursement to psychologists.
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1979 Jul; 30(7):493, 497. PubMed ID: 447237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Antitrust implications of health planning: National Gerimedical Hospital and Gerontology Center v. Blue Cross of Kansas City.
    Chase JB
    Am J Law Med; 1982; 8(3):321-48. PubMed ID: 7168454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Antitrust ruling touches on health care and insurance; requires Blue Shield reimbursement to psychologists.
    Schwartz R
    Health Law Vigil; 1980 Aug; 3(16):8-9. PubMed ID: 10247619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Plan contracts with providers: cost containment objectives amid conflicting legislative schemes.
    Heitler G; Ader M
    J Leg Med; 1981 Sep; 2(3):265-96. PubMed ID: 6976401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Washington believes it can control medical costs by reducing influence of doctors in Blue Shields.
    Schorr B
    Wall St J Midwest Ed; 1979 Mar; 59(103):40. PubMed ID: 10240386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.