These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3591895)
21. Nonulcerative complications of contact lens wear. Relative risks for different lens types. Stapleton F; Dart J; Minassian D Arch Ophthalmol; 1992 Nov; 110(11):1601-6. PubMed ID: 1444920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effect of contact lens wear on the conjunctival mucous system. Greiner JV; Allansmith MR Ophthalmology; 1981 Aug; 88(8):821-32. PubMed ID: 7322501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Morphology of contact lens-induced conjunctival epithelial flaps: a pilot study. Bergmanson JP; Tukler J; Leach NE; Alabdelmoneam M; Miller WL Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2012 Aug; 35(4):185-8. PubMed ID: 22503643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effects of a 0.9% sodium chloride ophthalmic solution on the ocular surface of symptomatic contact lens wearers. Barabino S; Rolando M; Camicione P; Chen W; Calabria G Can J Ophthalmol; 2005 Feb; 40(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 15825529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The vascular response to contact lens wear. McMonnies CW; Chapman-Davies A; Holden BA Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1982 Oct; 59(10):795-9. PubMed ID: 6183976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Objective and subjective responses in patients refitted to daily-wear silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Dumbleton K; Keir N; Moezzi A; Feng Y; Jones L; Fonn D Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Oct; 83(10):758-68. PubMed ID: 17041322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Ocular response to lens care systems in adolescent soft contact lens wearers. Soni PS; Horner DG; Ross J Optom Vis Sci; 1996 Feb; 73(2):70-85. PubMed ID: 8927315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Conjunctival cytology in hard and soft contact lens wear. Hirji NK; Scott J; Sabell AG Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1985; 5(3):333-5. PubMed ID: 4047658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparative clinical performance of rigid versus soft hyper Dk contact lenses used for continuous wear. Maldonado-Codina C; Morgan PB; Efron N; Efron S Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jun; 82(6):536-48. PubMed ID: 15976592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Conjunctival Microbiome Changes Associated With Soft Contact Lens and Orthokeratology Lens Wearing. Zhang H; Zhao F; Hutchinson DS; Sun W; Ajami NJ; Lai S; Wong MC; Petrosino JF; Fang J; Jiang J; Chen W; Reinach PS; Qu J; Zeng C; Zhang D; Zhou X Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2017 Jan; 58(1):128-136. PubMed ID: 28114568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Palpebral aperture sizes of rigid and soft contact lens wearers compared with nonwearers. Fonn D; Pritchard N; Garnett B; Davids L Optom Vis Sci; 1996 Mar; 73(3):211-4. PubMed ID: 8725026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Conjunctival impression cytology in contact lens wearers. Simon P; Jaison SG; Chopra SK; Jacob S Indian J Ophthalmol; 2002 Dec; 50(4):301-6. PubMed ID: 12532495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Are hard lenses superior to soft? Arguments in favor of hard lenses. Key JE Cornea; 1990; 9 Suppl 1():S9-11; discussion S15. PubMed ID: 2189686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of signs and symptoms in 3- and 9-o'clock staining. van der Worp E; de Brabander J; Swarbrick HA; Hendrikse F Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Mar; 86(3):260-5. PubMed ID: 19165124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]