These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35919988)

  • 1. Addressing Common Misuses and Pitfalls of P values in Biomedical Research.
    Wang M; Long Q
    Cancer Res; 2022 Aug; 82(15):2674-2677. PubMed ID: 35919988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. RIPOSTE: a framework for improving the design and analysis of laboratory-based research.
    Masca NG; Hensor EM; Cornelius VR; Buffa FM; Marriott HM; Eales JM; Messenger MP; Anderson AE; Boot C; Bunce C; Goldin RD; Harris J; Hinchliffe RF; Junaid H; Kingston S; Martin-Ruiz C; Nelson CP; Peacock J; Seed PT; Shinkins B; Staples KJ; Toombs J; Wright AK; Teare MD
    Elife; 2015 May; 4():. PubMed ID: 25951517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statistical pitfalls in medical research.
    Nyirongo VB; Mukaka MM; Kalilani-Phiri LV
    Malawi Med J; 2008 Mar; 20(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 19260441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The ongoing tyranny of statistical significance testing in biomedical research.
    Stang A; Poole C; Kuss O
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2010 Apr; 25(4):225-30. PubMed ID: 20339903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reducing bias in pelvic floor disorders research: using directed acyclic graphs as an aid.
    Sung VW
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2012 Jan; 31(1):115-20. PubMed ID: 21826724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An overview of issues in infant and developmental research for the creation of robust and replicable science.
    Davis-Kean PE; Ellis A
    Infant Behav Dev; 2019 Nov; 57():101339. PubMed ID: 31351250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Repeat: a framework to assess empirical reproducibility in biomedical research.
    McIntosh LD; Juehne A; Vitale CRH; Liu X; Alcoser R; Lukas JC; Evanoff B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):143. PubMed ID: 28923006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence-based statistical analysis and methods in biomedical research (SAMBR) checklists according to design features.
    Dwivedi AK; Shukla R
    Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2020 Aug; 3(4):e1211. PubMed ID: 32794640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing Dietary Outcomes in Intervention Studies: Pitfalls, Strategies, and Research Needs.
    Kirkpatrick SI; Collins CE; Keogh RH; Krebs-Smith SM; Neuhouser ML; Wallace A
    Nutrients; 2018 Jul; 10(8):. PubMed ID: 30065152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Administrative Data Use in National Registry Efforts: Blessing or Curse?
    Bedard NA; Katz JN; Losina E; Opare-Addo MB; Kopp PT
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2022 Oct; 104(Suppl 3):39-46. PubMed ID: 36260043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Opportunities and pitfalls of registry data for clinical research.
    Psoter KJ; Rosenfeld M
    Paediatr Respir Rev; 2013 Sep; 14(3):141-5. PubMed ID: 23707656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Design and statistical analysis of oral medicine studies: common pitfalls.
    Baccaglini L; Shuster JJ; Cheng J; Theriaque DW; Schoenbach VJ; Tomar SL; Poole C
    Oral Dis; 2010 Apr; 16(3):233-41. PubMed ID: 19874532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The emerging landscape of health research based on biobanks linked to electronic health records: Existing resources, statistical challenges, and potential opportunities.
    Beesley LJ; Salvatore M; Fritsche LG; Pandit A; Rao A; Brummett C; Willer CJ; Lisabeth LD; Mukherjee B
    Stat Med; 2020 Mar; 39(6):773-800. PubMed ID: 31859414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Promises and Pitfalls of High-Throughput Biological Assays.
    Finak G; Gottardo R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1415():225-43. PubMed ID: 27115636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reagent Validation to Facilitate Experimental Reproducibility.
    Williams M
    Curr Protoc Pharmacol; 2018 Jun; 81(1):e40. PubMed ID: 29927084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. BIAS: Transparent reporting of biomedical image analysis challenges.
    Maier-Hein L; Reinke A; Kozubek M; Martel AL; Arbel T; Eisenmann M; Hanbury A; Jannin P; Müller H; Onogur S; Saez-Rodriguez J; van Ginneken B; Kopp-Schneider A; Landman BA
    Med Image Anal; 2020 Dec; 66():101796. PubMed ID: 32911207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Methodological issues in observational studies and non-randomized controlled trials in oncology in the era of big data.
    Tanaka S; Tanaka S; Kawakami K
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2015 Apr; 45(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 25589456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Controlling for Informed Presence Bias Due to the Number of Health Encounters in an Electronic Health Record.
    Goldstein BA; Bhavsar NA; Phelan M; Pencina MJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 2016 Dec; 184(11):847-855. PubMed ID: 27852603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Applying propensity score methods in medical research: pitfalls and prospects.
    Luo Z; Gardiner JC; Bradley CJ
    Med Care Res Rev; 2010 Oct; 67(5):528-54. PubMed ID: 20442340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.