These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3592027)

  • 41. Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage.
    Balota DA; Chumbley JI
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1984 Jun; 10(3):340-57. PubMed ID: 6242411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Truly incidental encoding of frequency information.
    Hasher L; Zacks RT; Rose KC; Sanft H
    Am J Psychol; 1987; 100(1):69-91. PubMed ID: 3592026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Shock and awe: Distinct effects of taboo words on lexical decision and free recall.
    Madan CR; Shafer AT; Chan M; Singhal A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Apr; 70(4):793-810. PubMed ID: 27003746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Distinguishing common and task-specific processes in word identification: a matter of some moment?
    Andrews S; Heathcote A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Mar; 27(2):514-44. PubMed ID: 11294447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Perception and recognition memory of words and werds: two-way mirror effects.
    Becker DV; Goldinger SD; Stone GO
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Oct; 34(7):1495-511. PubMed ID: 17263074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Word recognition: age differences in contextual facilitation effects.
    Cohen G; Faulkner D
    Br J Psychol; 1983 May; 74(Pt 2):239-51. PubMed ID: 6883014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Can people strategically control the encoding and retrieval of some morphologic and typographic details of words?
    Jou J; Cortes HM
    Conscious Cogn; 2012 Sep; 21(3):1280-97. PubMed ID: 22819493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Do magnitude estimation and lexical decision tap similar processes?
    Ferraro FR; Bohlman D; Whetham T; Arnt S; Anderson M; Westerlund A
    Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Dec; 87(3 Pt 2):1239-45. PubMed ID: 10052082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Encoding the world around us: motor-related processing influences verbal memory.
    Madan CR; Singhal A
    Conscious Cogn; 2012 Sep; 21(3):1563-70. PubMed ID: 22863476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Lexical ambiguity and the timecourse of attentional allocation in word recognition.
    Kellas G; Ferraro FR; Simpson GB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1988 Nov; 14(4):601-9. PubMed ID: 2974871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The low-frequency encoding disadvantage: Word frequency affects processing demands.
    Diana RA; Reder LM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):805-15. PubMed ID: 16822148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Recognition and lexical decision without detection: unconscious perception?
    Merikle PM; Reingold EM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Aug; 16(3):574-83. PubMed ID: 2144572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Allocation of attention during visual word recognition.
    Becker CA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1976 Nov; 2(4):556-66. PubMed ID: 1011005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Perceptual inference through global lexical similarity.
    Johns BT; Jones MN
    Top Cogn Sci; 2012 Jan; 4(1):103-20. PubMed ID: 22253184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Interaction between affect and cognition in word perception.
    Kitayama S
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1990 Feb; 58(2):209-17. PubMed ID: 2319441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effects of lexical skills and orthographic neighborhood size in word memory.
    Ballot C; Robert C; Dujardin E; Mathey S
    Mem Cognit; 2024 Apr; 52(3):610-621. PubMed ID: 37943413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy.
    Gernsbacher MA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1984 Jun; 113(2):256-81. PubMed ID: 6242753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Word imageability and orthographic neighbourhood effects on memory: a study in free recall and recognition.
    Ballot C; Mathey S; Robert C
    Memory; 2021 Jul; 29(6):829-834. PubMed ID: 33910477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The time course of repetition effects for words and unfamiliar faces.
    Bentin S; Moscovitch M
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1988 Jun; 117(2):148-60. PubMed ID: 2969032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A bias in favor of the positive response to high-frequency words in recognition memory.
    Hoshino Y
    Mem Cognit; 1991 Nov; 19(6):607-16. PubMed ID: 1758305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.